Mehra Tarun, Müller Christian Thomas Benedikt, Volbracht Jörk, Seifert Burkhardt, Moos Rudolf
Medical Directorate, University Hospital of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 30;10(10):e0140874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140874. eCollection 2015.
Case weights of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) are determined by the average cost of cases from a previous billing period. However, a significant amount of cases are largely over- or underfunded. We therefore decided to analyze earning outliers of our hospital as to search for predictors enabling a better grouping under SwissDRG.
28,893 inpatient cases without additional private insurance discharged from our hospital in 2012 were included in our analysis. Outliers were defined by the interquartile range method. Predictors for deficit and profit outliers were determined with logistic regressions. Predictors were shortlisted with the LASSO regularized logistic regression method and compared to results of Random forest analysis. 10 of these parameters were selected for quantile regression analysis as to quantify their impact on earnings.
Psychiatric diagnosis and admission as an emergency case were significant predictors for higher deficit with negative regression coefficients for all analyzed quantiles (p<0.001). Admission from an external health care provider was a significant predictor for a higher deficit in all but the 90% quantile (p<0.001 for Q10, Q20, Q50, Q80 and p = 0.0017 for Q90). Burns predicted higher earnings for cases which were favorably remunerated (p<0.001 for the 90% quantile). Osteoporosis predicted a higher deficit in the most underfunded cases, but did not predict differences in earnings for balanced or profitable cases (Q10 and Q20: p<0.00, Q50: p = 0.10, Q80: p = 0.88 and Q90: p = 0.52). ICU stay, mechanical and patient clinical complexity level score (PCCL) predicted higher losses at the 10% quantile but also higher profits at the 90% quantile (p<0.001).
We suggest considering psychiatric diagnosis, admission as an emergency case and admission from an external health care provider as DRG split criteria as they predict large, consistent and significant losses.
诊断相关分组(DRG)的病例权重由上一计费周期病例的平均成本确定。然而,大量病例在很大程度上资金过剩或不足。因此,我们决定分析我院的盈利异常值,以寻找能够在瑞士DRG下实现更好分组的预测因素。
2012年我院出院的28893例无额外私人保险的住院病例纳入分析。异常值采用四分位数间距法定义。通过逻辑回归确定亏损和盈利异常值的预测因素。预测因素通过LASSO正则化逻辑回归方法入围,并与随机森林分析结果进行比较。其中10个参数被选用于分位数回归分析,以量化它们对收益的影响。
精神科诊断和急诊入院是亏损增加的显著预测因素,所有分析分位数的回归系数均为负(p<0.001)。除90%分位数外,来自外部医疗服务提供者的入院是亏损增加的显著预测因素(Q10、Q20、Q50、Q80时p<0.001,Q90时p = 0.0017)。烧伤预测报酬优厚的病例收益更高(90%分位数时p<0.001)。骨质疏松症预测资金最不足的病例亏损更高,但对于资金平衡或盈利的病例,未预测收益差异(Q10和Q20:p<0.00,Q50:p = 0.10,Q80:p = 0.88,Q90:p = 0.52)。重症监护病房停留时间、机械和患者临床复杂程度评分(PCCL)在10%分位数时预测亏损更高,但在90%分位数时也预测利润更高(p<0.001)。
我们建议将精神科诊断、急诊入院和来自外部医疗服务提供者的入院作为DRG分组标准,因为它们预测了巨大、一致且显著的亏损。