Endrich Olga, Rimle Carole, Zwahlen Marcel, Triep Karen, Raio Luigi, Nelle Mathias
Medical Directorate, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Student at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 24;12(1):e0170691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170691. eCollection 2017.
The ICD-10 categories of the diagnosis "perinatal asphyxia" are defined by clinical signs and a 1-minute Apgar score value. However, the modern conception is more complex and considers metabolic values related to the clinical state. A lack of consistency between the former clinical and the latter encoded diagnosis poses questions over the validity of the data. Our aim was to establish a refined classification which is able to distinctly separate cases according to clinical criteria and financial resource consumption. The hypothesis of the study is that outdated ICD-10 definitions result in differences between the encoded diagnosis asphyxia and the medical diagnosis referring to the clinical context.
Routinely collected health data (encoding and financial data) of the University Hospital of Bern were used. The study population was chosen by selected ICD codes, the encoded and the clinical diagnosis were analyzed and each case was reevaluated. The new method categorizes the diagnoses of perinatal asphyxia into the following groups: mild, moderate and severe asphyxia, metabolic acidosis and normal clinical findings. The differences of total costs per case were determined by using one-way analysis of variance.
The study population included 622 cases (P20 "intrauterine hypoxia" 399, P21 "birth asphyxia" 233). By applying the new method, the diagnosis asphyxia could be ruled out with a high probability in 47% of cases and the variance of case related costs (one-way ANOVA: F (5, 616) = 55.84, p < 0.001, multiple R-squared = 0.312, p < 0.001) could be best explained. The classification of the severity of asphyxia could clearly be linked to the complexity of cases.
The refined coding method provides clearly defined diagnoses groups and has the strongest effect on the distribution of costs. It improves the diagnosis accuracy of perinatal asphyxia concerning clinical practice, research and reimbursement.
“围产期窒息”诊断的国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)类别是由临床体征和1分钟阿氏评分值定义的。然而,现代观念更为复杂,还考虑与临床状态相关的代谢值。以前的临床诊断与后者编码诊断之间缺乏一致性,这对数据的有效性提出了质疑。我们的目的是建立一种精细的分类方法,能够根据临床标准和资源消耗明确区分病例。该研究的假设是,过时的ICD - 10定义导致编码诊断窒息与临床背景下的医学诊断之间存在差异。
使用伯尔尼大学医院常规收集的健康数据(编码和财务数据)。通过选定的ICD编码选择研究人群,分析编码诊断和临床诊断,并对每个病例进行重新评估。新方法将围产期窒息诊断分为以下几组:轻度、中度和重度窒息、代谢性酸中毒和正常临床发现。采用单因素方差分析确定每个病例的总成本差异。
研究人群包括622例(P20“宫内缺氧”399例,P21“出生窒息”233例)。应用新方法后,47%的病例中窒息诊断极有可能被排除,且病例相关成本的方差(单因素方差分析:F(5, 616) = 55.84,p < 0.001,多重决定系数 = 0.312,p < 0.001)能得到最佳解释。窒息严重程度的分类与病例复杂性明显相关。
精细编码方法提供了明确界定的诊断组,对成本分布影响最大。它提高了围产期窒息在临床实践、研究和报销方面的诊断准确性。