Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
BMJ Open. 2021 May 6;11(5):e041205. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041205.
We aimed to develop and validate a score to assess inpatient complexity and compare its performance with two currently used but not validated tools to estimate complexity (ie, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), patient clinical complexity level (PCCL)).
Consecutive patients discharged from the department of medicine of a tertiary care hospital were prospectively included into a derivation cohort from 1 October 2016 to 16 February 2017 (n=1407), and a temporal validation cohort from 17 February 2017 to 31 March 2017 (n=482). The physician in charge assessed complexity. Potential predictors comprised 52 parameters from the electronic health record such as health factors and hospital care usage. We fit a logistic regression model with backward selection to develop a prediction model and derive a score. We assessed and compared performance of model and score in internal and external validation using measures of discrimination and calibration.
Overall, 447 of 1407 patients (32%) in the derivation cohort, and 116 of 482 patients (24%) in the validation cohort were identified as complex. Eleven variables independently associated with complexity were included in the score. Using a cut-off of ≥24 score points to define high-risk patients, specificity was 81% and sensitivity 57% in the validation cohort. The score's area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was 0.78 in both the derivation and validation cohort. In comparison, the CCI had an AUROC between 0.58 and 0.61, and the PCCL between 0.64 and 0.69, respectively.
We derived and internally and externally validated a score that reflects patient complexity in the hospital setting, performed better than other tools and could help monitoring complex patients.
我们旨在开发和验证一种评分系统来评估住院患者的复杂性,并将其与目前使用但未验证的两种工具(即 Charlson 合并症指数 (CCI)、患者临床复杂程度分级 (PCCL))进行比较,以评估其性能。
连续纳入 2016 年 10 月 1 日至 2017 年 2 月 16 日期间从三级医院内科出院的患者进入推导队列(n=1407),以及 2017 年 2 月 17 日至 2017 年 3 月 31 日期间的临时验证队列(n=482)。负责的医生评估了复杂性。潜在预测因素包括电子健康记录中的 52 个参数,如健康因素和医院护理使用情况。我们采用向后选择的逻辑回归模型来开发预测模型并得出评分。我们通过测量判别能力和校准度来评估和比较内部和外部验证中模型和评分的性能。
在推导队列中,1407 例患者中有 447 例(32%),验证队列中有 482 例患者中的 116 例(24%)被确定为复杂患者。11 个与复杂性独立相关的变量被纳入评分中。在验证队列中,使用≥24 分的切点定义高危患者时,特异性为 81%,敏感性为 57%。评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)在推导和验证队列中分别为 0.78。相比之下,CCI 的 AUROC 为 0.58 至 0.61,PCCL 的 AUROC 为 0.64 至 0.69。
我们推导并内部和外部验证了一种评分系统,该评分反映了住院患者的复杂性,其性能优于其他工具,可以帮助监测复杂患者。