• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

把握关键:通过认知工作分析理解铁路平交道口的行人行为与风险

Walking the line: Understanding pedestrian behaviour and risk at rail level crossings with cognitive work analysis.

作者信息

Read Gemma J M, Salmon Paul M, Lenné Michael G, Stanton Neville A

机构信息

Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Building 70, Victoria 3800, Australia.

Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland 4558, Australia.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt A:209-27. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.10.004
PMID:26518501
Abstract

Pedestrian fatalities at rail level crossings (RLXs) are a public safety concern for governments worldwide. There is little literature examining pedestrian behaviour at RLXs and no previous studies have adopted a formative approach to understanding behaviour in this context. In this article, cognitive work analysis is applied to understand the constraints that shape pedestrian behaviour at RLXs in Melbourne, Australia. The five phases of cognitive work analysis were developed using data gathered via document analysis, behavioural observation, walk-throughs and critical decision method interviews. The analysis demonstrates the complex nature of pedestrian decision making at RLXs and the findings are synthesised to provide a model illustrating the influences on pedestrian decision making in this context (i.e. time, effort and social pressures). Further, the CWA outputs are used to inform an analysis of the risks to safety associated with pedestrian behaviour at RLXs and the identification of potential interventions to reduce risk.

摘要

铁路平交道口的行人死亡事故是全球各国政府关注的公共安全问题。关于行人在铁路平交道口行为的文献很少,之前也没有研究采用形成性方法来理解这种情况下的行为。在本文中,运用认知工作分析来理解影响澳大利亚墨尔本铁路平交道口行人行为的制约因素。认知工作分析的五个阶段是通过文件分析、行为观察、实地考察和关键决策方法访谈收集的数据来确定的。分析表明了铁路平交道口行人决策的复杂性,并综合研究结果提供了一个模型,说明在这种情况下对行人决策的影响因素(即时间、精力和社会压力)。此外,认知工作分析的结果用于分析与铁路平交道口行人行为相关的安全风险,并确定降低风险的潜在干预措施。

相似文献

1
Walking the line: Understanding pedestrian behaviour and risk at rail level crossings with cognitive work analysis.把握关键:通过认知工作分析理解铁路平交道口的行人行为与风险
Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt A:209-27. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
2
Variability in decision-making and critical cue use by different road users at rail level crossings.不同道路使用者在铁路平交道口的决策和关键线索使用的变异性。
Ergonomics. 2016 Jun;59(6):754-66. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1095356. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
3
Systems-based approach to investigate unsafe pedestrian behaviour at level crossings.基于系统的方法研究平交道口不安全行人行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Aug;81:167-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 21.
4
To stop or not to stop: Contrasting compliant and non-compliant driver behaviour at rural rail level crossings.停还是不停:农村铁路平交道口合规与违规驾驶行为对比
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:209-219. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
5
Where do novice and experienced drivers direct their attention on approach to urban rail level crossings?新手和经验丰富的驾驶员在接近城市轨道交通平交道口时会将注意力集中在哪里?
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Apr;77:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
6
More than meets the eye: Using cognitive work analysis to identify design requirements for future rail level crossing systems.表象之下:运用认知工作分析确定未来铁路平交道口系统的设计要求。
Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt B:312-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Using the decision ladder to understand road user decision making at actively controlled rail level crossings.利用决策阶梯理解主动控制铁路平交道口处道路使用者的决策过程。
Appl Ergon. 2016 Sep;56:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
8
A comparative study of rail-pedestrian trespassing crash injury severity between highway-rail grade crossings and non-crossings.铁路-行人闯入碰撞伤害严重程度的公路-铁路平交道口与非平交道口比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:427-438. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Mistakes or deliberate violations? A study into the origins of rule breaking at pedestrian train crossings.失误还是蓄意违规?对行人穿越火车道口规则破坏行为根源的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Apr;77:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
10
An on-road network analysis-based approach to studying driver situation awareness at rail level crossings.基于道路网络分析的铁路平交道口驾驶员情境意识研究方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.012. Epub 2012 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg: Using Systems Archetypes to Understand Common and Recurring Issues in Sports Coaching.冰山一角之外:运用系统基模理解体育教练中常见且反复出现的问题
Front Sports Act Living. 2019 Oct 16;1:49. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00049. eCollection 2019.
2
A Systems Approach to Performance Analysis in Women's Netball: Using Work Domain Analysis to Model Elite Netball Performance.一种女子无挡板篮球运动表现分析的系统方法:运用工作领域分析对精英无挡板篮球运动表现进行建模。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 6;10:201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00201. eCollection 2019.
3
What's in a game? A systems approach to enhancing performance analysis in football.
一场比赛中包含什么?一种用于加强足球比赛表现分析的系统方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 17;12(2):e0172565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172565. eCollection 2017.