Bexhell Helen, Guthrie Kate, Cleland Kelly, Trussell James
Hull and East Riding Hospital Trust, Hull, England.
CHCP CIC, Hull, England.
Contraception. 2016 Mar;93(3):233-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
This study has two aims. The first is to assess the proportion of unplanned pregnancies among women attending antenatal clinics (ANCs) and those undergoing induced abortion (IA). The second is to assess both their previous contraceptive use and contraceptive intention, with particular focus on the use or consideration of any long-acting reversible contraceptives in Hull and East Riding in order to inform service redesign.
Consecutive women attending their first ANC appointment and women attending a gynecology clinic undergoing IA were asked to complete a two-page questionnaire that contained a validated pregnancy intendedness questionnaire [the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP)] and questions to establish contraceptive use and access prior to this index pregnancy.
The overall response rate was 69%. We received 648 evaluable questionnaires for women undergoing IA. Of these pregnancies, 75.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 72.3%-79.0%] were unplanned (LMUP, score 0-3). We received 1001 evaluable questionnaires from women booking at ANCs. Of these pregnancies, 5.5% (95% CI, 4.2%-7.0%) were unplanned. Among those with unplanned pregnancies who were not using contraception, 31% reported that they were unable to obtain the method they wanted. Among those using a method immediately prior to the index unplanned pregnancy, 33% stated that it was not the method they wanted; of these, 75% would have preferred sterilization, the implant, injectable or intrauterine contraceptive.
Unplanned pregnancies in this population are common among women undergoing IA but are uncommon among women attending an ANC. About a third of women not using contraception reported that they were unable to obtain the method they wanted, and about a third of women using contraception stated that they were not using the method they would have preferred.
Opportunities to prevent unplanned pregnancies are missed when staff in primary and secondary care looking after women do not knowledgeably inform, discuss and offer contraception in a timely manner, particularly the most effective long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Services should be deliverable where women are: this includes within pregnancy care services. Seeking patient experience is an essential component of service redesign.
本研究有两个目标。第一个目标是评估在产前诊所就诊的妇女以及接受人工流产的妇女中意外怀孕的比例。第二个目标是评估她们既往的避孕使用情况和避孕意愿,特别关注赫尔和东里丁地区长效可逆避孕方法的使用或考虑情况,以便为服务重新设计提供依据。
要求连续就诊的首次产前检查的妇女以及在妇科诊所接受人工流产的妇女填写一份两页的问卷,其中包含一份经过验证的妊娠意愿问卷[伦敦意外妊娠测量量表(LMUP)]以及关于本次妊娠前避孕使用情况和获取途径的问题。
总体回复率为69%。我们收到了648份可用于评估的人工流产妇女问卷。在这些妊娠中,75.8%[95%置信区间(CI),72.3%-79.0%]为意外妊娠(LMUP评分0-3)。我们收到了1001份可用于评估的产前检查预约妇女问卷。在这些妊娠中,5.5%(95%CI,4.2%-7.0%)为意外妊娠。在意外怀孕且未使用避孕措施的妇女中,31%报告称无法获得她们想要的避孕方法。在本次意外妊娠前立即使用某种避孕方法的妇女中,33%表示这不是她们想要的方法;其中,75%更倾向于绝育、植入剂、注射剂或宫内节育器。
在接受人工流产的妇女中,意外怀孕很常见,但在产前诊所就诊的妇女中并不常见。约三分之一未使用避孕措施的妇女报告称无法获得她们想要的方法,约三分之一使用避孕措施的妇女表示她们没有使用自己更倾向的方法。
当负责照顾女性的初级和二级医疗保健人员未能及时、明智地提供避孕信息、进行讨论并提供避孕措施,尤其是最有效的长效可逆避孕方法时,就错失了预防意外怀孕的机会。服务应在女性所在之处提供:这包括在妊娠护理服务中。寻求患者体验是服务重新设计的重要组成部分。