Toscano Cristiana M, Zhuo Xiaohui, Imai Kumiko, Duncan Bruce B, Polanczyk Carísi A, Zhang Ping, Engelgau Michael, Schmidt Maria Inês
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS Brazil ; Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Rua T-62, 595, Apto. 201, Goiânia, GO 74223-180 Brazil.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015 Oct 31;7:95. doi: 10.1186/s13098-015-0090-8. eCollection 2015.
The cost-effectiveness of screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) in developing countries remains unknown. The Brazilian government conducted a nationwide population screening program for type 2 diabetes mellitus (BNDSP) in which 22 million capillary glucose tests were performed in individuals aged 40 years and older. The objective of this study was to evaluate the life-time cost-effectiveness of a national population-based screening program for DM2 conducted in Brazil.
We used a Markov-based cost-effectiveness model to simulate the long-term costs and benefits of screening for DM2, compared to no screening program. The analysis was conducted from a public health care system perspective. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of results to key model parameters.
Brazilian National diabetes screening program will yield a large health benefit and higher costs. Compared with no screening, screen detection of undiagnosed diabetes resulted in US$ 31,147 per QALY gained. Results from sensitivity analyses found that screening targeted at hypertensive individuals would cost US$ 22,695/QALY. When benefits from early glycemic control on cardiovascular outcomes were considered, the cost per QALY gained would reduce significantly.
In the base case analysis, not considering the intangible benefit of transferring diabetes management to primary care nor the benefit of using statin to treat eligible diabetic patients, CE ratios were not cost-effective considering thresholds proposed by the World Health Organization. However, significant uncertainty was demonstrated in sensitivity analysis. Our results indicate that policy-makers should carefully balance the benefit and cost of the program while considering using a population-based approach to screen for diabetes.
在发展中国家,2型糖尿病(DM2)筛查的成本效益尚不清楚。巴西政府开展了一项全国性的2型糖尿病人口筛查项目(BNDSP),对40岁及以上的人群进行了2200万次毛细血管血糖检测。本研究的目的是评估在巴西开展的基于全国人口的DM2筛查项目的终身成本效益。
我们使用基于马尔可夫的成本效益模型来模拟DM2筛查与不进行筛查项目相比的长期成本和效益。分析是从公共卫生保健系统的角度进行的。进行敏感性分析以检验结果对关键模型参数的稳健性。
巴西国家糖尿病筛查项目将产生巨大的健康效益和更高的成本。与不进行筛查相比,筛查出未诊断的糖尿病患者每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本为31,147美元。敏感性分析结果表明,针对高血压患者的筛查每QALY成本为22,695美元。当考虑早期血糖控制对心血管结局的益处时,每获得一个QALY的成本将显著降低。
在基础案例分析中,不考虑将糖尿病管理转移到初级保健的无形益处以及使用他汀类药物治疗符合条件的糖尿病患者的益处,按照世界卫生组织提出的阈值,成本效益比不具有成本效益。然而,敏感性分析显示存在显著的不确定性。我们的结果表明,政策制定者在考虑采用基于人群的方法进行糖尿病筛查时,应仔细权衡该项目的益处和成本。