• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你明白我的意思吗?:感知到的理解能缓冲冲突对关系满意度的负面影响。

Do you get where I'm coming from?: Perceived understanding buffers against the negative impact of conflict on relationship satisfaction.

作者信息

Gordon Amie M, Chen Serena

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Feb;110(2):239-60. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000039. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1037/pspi0000039
PMID:26523997
Abstract

Conflict can have damaging effects on relationship health. But is all conflict detrimental? Across 7 studies, we tested the overarching hypothesis that conflict in close relationships is only detrimental when people do not feel their thoughts, feelings, and point of view are understood by their relationship partners. Supporting this, conflict was negatively associated with relationship satisfaction among participants who perceived their romantic partner as less understanding, but not among those who felt more understood by their partners. This was true cross-sectionally (Study 1), experimentally (Studies 2, 3, 6a, and 6b), in daily life (Study 4), and for both members of couples pre- to postconflict conversation in the laboratory (Study 5). The buffering effects of feeling understood could not be explained by people who felt more understood being more understanding themselves, having more general positive perceptions of their partners, fighting about less important or different types of issues, engaging in more pleasant conflict conversations, or being more satisfied with their relationships before the conflict. Perceived understanding was positively associated with conflict resolution, but this did not explain the benefits of feeling understood. Evidence from Studies 6a and 6b suggests that feeling understood during conflict may buffer against reduced relationship satisfaction in part because it strengthens the relationship and signals that one's partner is invested. Overall, these studies suggest that perceived understanding may be a critical buffer against the potentially detrimental effects of relationship conflict.

摘要

冲突会对人际关系健康产生破坏性影响。但所有冲突都是有害的吗?在7项研究中,我们检验了一个总体假设,即亲密关系中的冲突只有在人们觉得自己的想法、感受和观点未被伴侣理解时才是有害的。支持这一观点的是,在那些认为自己的浪漫伴侣理解较少的参与者中,冲突与关系满意度呈负相关,但在那些觉得自己更被伴侣理解的参与者中并非如此。这在横断面研究(研究1)、实验研究(研究2、3、6a和6b)、日常生活研究(研究4)以及实验室中夫妻冲突前与冲突后对话的双方成员中(研究5)都是成立的。感觉被理解的缓冲效应无法用以下因素来解释:那些感觉更被理解的人自己更善解人意、对伴侣有更普遍的积极看法、为不太重要或不同类型的问题争吵、进行更愉快的冲突对话,或者在冲突前对自己的关系更满意。感知到的理解与冲突解决呈正相关,但这并不能解释感觉被理解的好处。研究6a和6b的证据表明,在冲突期间感觉被理解可能部分缓冲了关系满意度的下降,因为它加强了关系并表明伴侣投入其中。总体而言,这些研究表明,感知到的理解可能是对抗关系冲突潜在有害影响的关键缓冲因素。

相似文献

1
Do you get where I'm coming from?: Perceived understanding buffers against the negative impact of conflict on relationship satisfaction.你明白我的意思吗?:感知到的理解能缓冲冲突对关系满意度的负面影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Feb;110(2):239-60. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000039. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
2
Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat: the benefits and costs of inducing guilt in romantic partners.依恋焦虑与关系威胁反应:在浪漫伴侣身上诱发内疚感的利弊。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Feb;106(2):235-56. doi: 10.1037/a0034371. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
3
Seeking security or growth: a regulatory focus perspective on motivations in romantic relationships.寻求安全或成长:关系中的动机——一个基于调节定向理论的视角
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov;101(5):935-54. doi: 10.1037/a0025012.
4
Optimism in close relationships: How seeing things in a positive light makes them so.亲密关系中的乐观主义:以积极的眼光看待事物如何使其成为现实。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(1):143-53. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.143.
5
When Do Personality and Emotion Predict Destructive Behavior During Relationship Conflict? The Role of Perceived Commitment Asymmetry.人格和情绪何时能预测关系冲突期间的破坏性行为?感知承诺不对称的作用。
J Pers. 2015 Oct;83(5):523-34. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12129. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
6
Temporality of couple conflict and relationship perceptions.夫妻冲突的时间性和关系认知。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Jun;32(4):445-455. doi: 10.1037/fam0000398. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes.信任、关系评价的可变性与关系过程。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jul;99(1):14-31. doi: 10.1037/a0019714.
8
Attachment insecurity, biased perceptions of romantic partners' negative emotions, and hostile relationship behavior.依恋不安全感、对伴侣负面情绪的偏见认知与敌对的关系行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 May;108(5):730-49. doi: 10.1037/a0038987.
9
Emotional support, conflict, depression, and relationship satisfaction in a romantic partner.浪漫伴侣中的情感支持、冲突、抑郁及关系满意度。
J Psychol. 2004 Nov;138(6):532-42. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.138.6.532-542.
10
Relationship satisfaction and conflict over minor and major issues in romantic relationships.恋爱关系中的关系满意度以及在重大和小问题上的冲突。
J Psychol. 2002 Jan;136(1):75-81. doi: 10.1080/00223980209604140.

引用本文的文献

1
Is it Genuine or Pseudo-Forgiveness? Offenders' Appraisals of Victims' Expressed Forgiveness as a Function of Engagement in Co-Reflection.是真正的宽恕还是伪宽恕?罪犯对受害者所表达宽恕的评估作为共同反思参与度的函数。
Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2024 Aug 19;37:15. doi: 10.5334/irsp.887. eCollection 2024.
2
Adolescents' Preferred and Inferred Strategies for Being Accurately Understood by Their Parents.青少年希望父母准确理解自己的偏好策略及推断策略。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02193-w.
3
Loneliness and Relationship Well-Being: Investigating the Mediating Roles of Relationship Awareness and Distraction among Romantic Partners.
孤独与人际关系幸福感:探究恋爱伴侣间关系意识和注意力分散的中介作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 24;14(6):439. doi: 10.3390/bs14060439.
4
AI can help people feel heard, but an AI label diminishes this impact.人工智能可以帮助人们感到被倾听,但人工智能的标签会削弱这种影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 2;121(14):e2319112121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319112121. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
5
Leveraging AI for democratic discourse: Chat interventions can improve online political conversations at scale.利用人工智能促进民主对话:聊天干预可以大规模改善在线政治对话。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2311627120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2311627120. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
6
Understanding the Links Between Perceiving Gratitude and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction Using an Accuracy and Bias Framework.运用准确性和偏差框架理解感恩感知与浪漫关系满意度之间的联系。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2023 Nov;14(8):900-910. doi: 10.1177/19485506221137958. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
7
Sense of Relational Entitlement and Couple Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Couple Negotiation Tactics.关系权利感与夫妻关系结果:夫妻协商策略的中介作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 3;13(6):467. doi: 10.3390/bs13060467.
8
How to Improve Others' Emotions: Reappraise and be Responsive.如何改善他人的情绪:重新评估并做出回应。
Affect Sci. 2023 Apr 15;4(2):233-247. doi: 10.1007/s42761-023-00183-4. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Relationship difficulties and "technoference" during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的人际关系困扰与“科技干扰”
J Soc Pers Relat. 2022 Nov;39(11):3204-3227. doi: 10.1177/02654075221093611.
10
Attitudes in an interpersonal context: Psychological safety as a route to attitude change.人际环境中的态度:心理安全感作为态度改变的途径。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 26;13:932413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932413. eCollection 2022.