Jurkiewicz Olivia, McGarrigle C Blair, Oveis Christopher
San Diego, USA University of California.
Los Angeles, USA University of California.
Affect Sci. 2023 Apr 15;4(2):233-247. doi: 10.1007/s42761-023-00183-4. eCollection 2023 Jun.
People often try to improve others' emotions. However, it is unclear which interpersonal emotion regulation strategies are most effective and why. In 121 candid dyadic conversations between undergraduate students via video conferencing, target participants recounted a stressful event to regulator participants. Three strategies used by regulators during these conversations to change targets' emotions were obtained from the regulator after the conversation: extrinsic reappraisal, extrinsic suppression, and extrinsic acceptance. Perceived regulator responsiveness was obtained from targets to examine the social consequences of extrinsic emotion regulation and its mediating role in successful extrinsic emotion regulation. We found that regulators' extrinsic reappraisal use was associated with improved target emotions measured across two distinct classes of outcomes: targets' emotions during the conversation and targets' perception that the regulator improved their emotions. Regulators' extrinsic suppression and acceptance, in contrast, were not related with improved target emotions or perceptions of improvement. Instead, all extrinsic regulatory strategies were associated with improved targets' emotions when mediated by targets' perceptions of regulator responsiveness. Finally, observer-ratings of regulators' extrinsic reappraisal and suppression use were found to be consistent with regulators' self-ratings and follow the same pattern of results on the outcome measures. These findings provide insight into why the social regulation of emotions can succeed or fail and hold implications for interventions aimed at guiding people toward more successfully improving others' emotions.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-023-00183-4.
人们常常试图改善他人的情绪。然而,尚不清楚哪种人际情绪调节策略最为有效以及原因。在121次本科生通过视频会议进行的坦诚的二元对话中,目标参与者向调节者参与者讲述了一件压力事件。对话结束后,从调节者那里获取了他们在这些对话中用于改变目标情绪的三种策略:外在重新评价、外在抑制和外在接受。从目标那里获取了对调节者反应性的感知,以检验外在情绪调节的社会后果及其在成功的外在情绪调节中的中介作用。我们发现,调节者使用外在重新评价与在两类不同结果中衡量的目标情绪改善相关:对话期间目标的情绪以及目标认为调节者改善了他们情绪的感知。相比之下,调节者的外在抑制和接受与目标情绪的改善或改善的感知无关。相反,当由目标对调节者反应性的感知进行中介时,所有外在调节策略都与目标情绪的改善相关。最后,发现观察者对调节者外在重新评价和抑制使用的评分与调节者的自我评分一致,并且在结果测量上遵循相同的结果模式。这些发现为情绪的社会调节为何会成功或失败提供了见解,并对旨在引导人们更成功地改善他人情绪的干预措施具有启示意义。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s42761-023-00183-4获取的补充材料。