Suppr超能文献

经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术的真正仅一线局部麻醉方案

True First-Line Local-Anesthesia Only Protocol for Transfemoral TAVI.

作者信息

Piayda Kerstin D, Gafoor Sameer, Bertog Stefan, Doss Mirko, Vaskelyte Laura, Matic Predrag, Franke Jennifer, Hofmann Ilona, Staiger Nina, Reinartz Markus, Sievert Horst

机构信息

CardioVascular Center Frankfurt, Seckbacher Landstrasse 65, 60389 Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Nov;27(11):501-8.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via femoral access under local anesthesia only (without concomitant sedation) as the initial strategy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing planned transfemoral TAVI without routine general anesthesia between May 2005 and December 2013 were identified. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and a 30-day clinical follow-up were obtained. A total of 215 patients underwent TAVI with local anesthesia only as the initial strategy (LA group). Of these patients, 40 (18.6%) received additional sedation (LAS group) during the procedure due to inadequate pain control or agitation and 7 patients (3.3%) underwent conversion to general anesthesia (GA group). TAVI was successfully performed in 211 cases (98.2%). When 30-day outcomes for patients requiring only local anesthesia were compared with patients requiring additional sedation, there was a significantly longer duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay in the group with additional sedation (LAS, 5.0 days [range, 3.0-6.0 days] vs LA 3 days [range, 2.0-5.0 days]; P=.02) and general anesthesia (GA 7.0 days [range, 2.5-18.0 days] vs LA 3 days [range, 2.0-5.0]; P=.04).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that TAVI with LA only as the initial strategy is a feasible alternative to GA, with potential benefit of this strategy over using routine concomitant sedation. LA only may be considered a primary option in many patients.

摘要

目的

评估仅在局部麻醉下(不伴有镇静)经股动脉途径进行经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)作为初始策略的安全性和可行性。

方法与结果

确定2005年5月至2013年12月期间计划行经股动脉TAVI且未进行常规全身麻醉的患者。获取基线特征、手术结果及30天临床随访情况。共有215例患者以仅局部麻醉作为初始策略接受TAVI(局部麻醉组)。在这些患者中,40例(18.6%)因疼痛控制不佳或躁动在手术过程中接受了额外镇静(局部麻醉加镇静组),7例(3.3%)转为全身麻醉(全身麻醉组)。211例(98.2%)TAVI手术成功完成。将仅需局部麻醉的患者与需额外镇静的患者的30天结果进行比较时,接受额外镇静的组(局部麻醉加镇静组,5.0天[范围3.0 - 6.0天] vs 局部麻醉组3天[范围2.0 - 5.0天];P = 0.02)和全身麻醉组(全身麻醉组7.0天[范围2.5 - 18.0天] vs 局部麻醉组3天[范围2.0 - 5.0];P = 0.04)的重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间明显更长。

结论

我们的研究表明,仅以局部麻醉作为初始策略的TAVI是全身麻醉的一种可行替代方法,该策略可能比使用常规伴随镇静更具优势。在许多患者中,仅局部麻醉可被视为主要选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验