• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改变的核心:在简短的夫妻干预中,接纳与亲密感介导治疗反应。

The heart of change: Acceptance and intimacy mediate treatment response in a brief couples intervention.

作者信息

Hawrilenko Matt, Gray Tatiana D, Córdova James V

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Clark University.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2016 Feb;30(1):93-103. doi: 10.1037/fam0000160. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1037/fam0000160
PMID:26524618
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4742399/
Abstract

In this study, we examined mediators of a brief couples intervention. Intimate safety, acceptance, and activation were examined in 2 roles: their contribution to marital satisfaction gains in the first 2 weeks after treatment (contemporaneous effects), and how early changes in the mediators influenced longer term changes in marital satisfaction over 2 years of follow-up (lagged effects). Married couples (N = 215) were randomized to either an intervention group or a wait-list control group and followed for 2 years. Latent change-score models were used to examine contemporaneous and time-lagged mediation. A booster intervention in the 2nd year was used for a replication study. Changes in intimate safety and acceptance were uniquely associated with contemporaneous treatment effects on relationship satisfaction in Year 1, but only acceptance was uniquely associated with contemporaneous effects in Year 2. With respect to lagged effects, early changes in acceptance partially mediated later changes in marital satisfaction in Year 1, whereas the same effect for intimate safety was marginally significant. These lagged paths were moderate in size and indirect effects were small. No lagged effects were significant in Year 2. Change in activation was not significant as either a contemporaneous or a lagged predictor of change in relationship satisfaction. We found moderate support for acceptance and more limited support for intimate safety as mediators of short- and long-term treatment response, suggesting that these processes play an important role in sustaining marital health.

摘要

在本研究中,我们考察了一种简短的夫妻干预措施的中介因素。从两个方面考察亲密安全感、接纳度和积极性:它们对治疗后前两周婚姻满意度提升的贡献(同期效应),以及中介因素的早期变化如何在两年的随访中影响婚姻满意度的长期变化(滞后效应)。已婚夫妇(N = 215)被随机分为干预组或等待名单对照组,并随访两年。使用潜在变化分数模型来考察同期和时间滞后的中介作用。在第二年进行了强化干预以进行重复研究。亲密安全感和接纳度的变化与第1年关系满意度的同期治疗效果有独特关联,但只有接纳度与第2年的同期效果有独特关联。关于滞后效应,接纳度的早期变化在第1年部分中介了婚姻满意度的后期变化,而亲密安全感的相同效应则微弱显著。这些滞后路径的规模适中,间接效应较小。在第2年没有显著的滞后效应。积极性的变化作为关系满意度变化的同期或滞后预测指标均不显著。我们发现,作为短期和长期治疗反应的中介因素,接纳度得到了适度支持,而亲密安全感得到的支持更为有限,这表明这些过程在维持婚姻健康方面发挥着重要作用。

相似文献

1
The heart of change: Acceptance and intimacy mediate treatment response in a brief couples intervention.改变的核心:在简短的夫妻干预中,接纳与亲密感介导治疗反应。
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Feb;30(1):93-103. doi: 10.1037/fam0000160. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
2
The Marriage Checkup: a randomized controlled trial of annual relationship health checkups.婚姻体检:年度关系健康检查的随机对照试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Aug;82(4):592-604. doi: 10.1037/a0037097. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
3
The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach.婚姻中亲密关系的人际过程模型:一种日记法和多层次建模方法。
J Fam Psychol. 2005 Jun;19(2):314-23. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314.
4
Marital satisfaction, partner communication, and illness acceptance among couples coping with breast cancer: A dyadic approach.夫妻双方应对乳腺癌:婚姻满意度、伴侣沟通和疾病接受度的双重视角。
Psychooncology. 2023 Aug;32(8):1240-1247. doi: 10.1002/pon.6174. Epub 2023 May 25.
5
Sexuality, intimacy, and marital satisfaction in Iranian first-time parents.伊朗初为人父母者的性生活、亲密关系和婚姻满意度。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2011;37(2):77-88. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.547336.
6
Disentangling acceptance: Direct and indirect effects of partner acceptance on felt acceptance and relationship satisfaction.厘清接纳:伴侣接纳对感受接纳和关系满意度的直接和间接影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Apr;36(3):378-384. doi: 10.1037/fam0000900. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
7
Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: are similar spouses happier?夫妻相似度与婚姻满意度:相似的配偶更幸福吗?
J Pers. 2006 Oct;74(5):1401-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00414.x.
8
Marital stability, satisfaction and well-being in old age: variability and continuity in long-term continuously married older persons.老年婚姻的稳定性、满意度与幸福感:长期持续婚姻的老年人的变异性与连续性
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Apr;21(4):389-398. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1102197. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
9
Direct and indirect effects of commitment on interdependence and satisfaction in married couples.婚姻关系中承诺对相互依赖和满意度的直接与间接影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Mar;30(2):214-20. doi: 10.1037/fam0000174. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
10
Marriage improves neuroticism in Chinese newlyweds: Communication and marital affect as mediators.婚姻改善中国新婚夫妇的神经质:沟通和婚姻情感作为中介。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Oct;32(7):986-991. doi: 10.1037/fam0000448. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A Community-Based Participatory Approach to Evaluating and Adapting an Innovative Family-Based Hypertension Self-Management Intervention for African American Primary Care Patients.一种基于社区参与的方法,用于评估和调整针对非裔美国初级保健患者的创新型家庭高血压自我管理干预措施。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02534-2.
2
Reimagining Medication Adherence: A Novel Holistic Model for Hypertension Therapy.重新构想药物依从性:高血压治疗的一种新型整体模型。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Feb 12;18:391-410. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S442645. eCollection 2024.
3
Dynamical Properties and Conceptual Interpretation of Latent Change Score Models.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of behavioral couple therapy on attachment in distressed couples.行为夫妻治疗对困扰夫妻依恋关系的影响。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2013 Oct;39(4):407-20. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12020. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
2
The Marriage Checkup: a randomized controlled trial of annual relationship health checkups.婚姻体检:年度关系健康检查的随机对照试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Aug;82(4):592-604. doi: 10.1037/a0037097. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
3
Is skills training necessary for the primary prevention of marital distress and dissolution? A 3-year experimental study of three interventions.
潜在变化分数模型的动力学性质与概念解释
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 29;12:696419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696419. eCollection 2021.
4
Disentangling acceptance: Direct and indirect effects of partner acceptance on felt acceptance and relationship satisfaction.厘清接纳:伴侣接纳对感受接纳和关系满意度的直接和间接影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Apr;36(3):378-384. doi: 10.1037/fam0000900. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Mechanisms of change in a brief, online relationship intervention.简短在线关系干预中改变的机制。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):57-67. doi: 10.1037/fam0000569. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
6
Addressing Relationship Health Needs in Primary Care: Adapting the Marriage Checkup for Use in Medical Settings with Military Couples.满足初级保健中的关系健康需求:改编婚姻检查以用于军人夫妻的医疗环境。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2017 Dec;24(3-4):259-269. doi: 10.1007/s10880-017-9517-8.
技能培训对于婚姻困扰和离婚的一级预防是否必要?三种干预措施的 3 年实验研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):949-961. doi: 10.1037/a0034209. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
4
Acceptance in behavior therapy: Understanding the process of change.行为疗法中的接纳:理解改变的过程。
Behav Anal. 2001 Fall;24(2):213-26. doi: 10.1007/BF03392032.
5
Intimacy: A behavioral interpretation.亲密关系:一种行为学解读。
Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;24(1):75-86. doi: 10.1007/BF03392020.
6
How can we improve preventive and educational interventions for intimate relationships?我们如何改进亲密关系的预防和教育干预措施?
Behav Ther. 2012 Mar;43(1):113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 May 30.
7
Where's the action? Understanding what works and why in relationship education.行动在哪里?理解关系教育中什么有效以及为什么有效。
Behav Ther. 2012 Mar;43(1):99-112. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 May 30.
8
Common principles of couple therapy.夫妻治疗的共同原则。
Behav Ther. 2012 Mar;43(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
9
Universal processes and common factors in couple therapy and relationship education.夫妻治疗和关系教育中的普遍过程和共同因素。
Behav Ther. 2012 Mar;43(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 May 30.
10
Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study.婚姻与关系教育有效吗?一项元分析研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Oct;76(5):723-34. doi: 10.1037/a0012584.