• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留实质的局限性胰头切除术治疗良性肿瘤和低风险壶腹周围癌——一项系统评价

Parenchyma-Sparing, Limited Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Tumors and Low-Risk Periampullary Cancer--a Systematic Review.

作者信息

Beger Hans G, Mayer Benjamin, Rau Bettina M

机构信息

c/o University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, Ulm, 89081, Germany.

Department of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan;20(1):206-17. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2981-2. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-015-2981-2
PMID:26525207
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parenchyma-sparing local extirpation of benign tumors of the pancreatic head provides the potential benefits of preservation of functional tissue and low postoperative morbidity.

METHODS

Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were surveyed for studies performing limited resection of the pancreatic head and resection of a segment of the duodenum and common bile duct or preservation of the duodenum and common bile duct (CBD). The systematic analysis included 27 cohort studies that reported on limited pancreatic head resections for benign tumors. In a subgroup analysis, 12 of the cohort studies were additionally evaluated to compare the postoperative morbidity after total head resection including duodenal segment resection (DPPHR-S) and total head resection conserving duodenum and CBD (DPPHR-T).

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-nine of a total of 503 patients (67.4%) underwent total head resections. One hundred forty-seven patients (29.2%) of them underwent segmental resection of the duodenum and CBD (DPPHR-S) and 192 patients (38.2%) underwent preservation of duodenum and CBD. One hundred sixty-four patients experienced partial head resection (32.6%). The final histological diagnosis revealed in 338 of 503 patients (67.2%) cystic neoplasms, 53 patients (10.3%) neuroendocrine tumors, and 20 patients (4.0%) low-risk periampullary carcinomas. Severe postoperative complications occurred in 62 of 490 patients (12.7%), pancreatic fistula B + C in 40 of 295 patients (13.6%), resurgery was experienced in 2.7%, and delayed gastric emptying in 12.3%. The 90-day mortality was 0.4%. The subgroup analysis comparing 143 DPPHR-S patients with 95 DPPHR-T patients showed that the respective rates of procedure-related biliary complications were 0.7% (1 of 143 patients) versus 8.4% (8 of 95 patients) (p ≤ 0.0032), and rates of duodenal complications were 0 versus 6.3% (6 of 95 patients) (p ≤ 0.0037). DPPHR-S was associated with a higher rate of delay of gastric emptying compared to DPPHR-T (18.9 vs. 2.1%, p ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Parenchyma-sparing, limited head resection for benign tumors preserves functional pancreatic and duodenal tissue and carries in terms of fistula B + C rate, resurgery, rehospitalization, and 90-day mortality a low risk of postoperative complications. A subgroup analysis exhibited after total pancreatic head resection that preserves the duodenum and CBD an association with a significant increase in procedure-related biliary and duodenal complications compared to total head resection combined with resection of the periampullary segment of the duodenum and resection of the intrapancreatic CBD.

摘要

背景

保留实质的胰头良性肿瘤局部切除可带来保留功能组织及降低术后发病率的潜在益处。

方法

检索Medline/PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,查找有关胰头有限切除以及十二指肠和胆总管部分切除或保留十二指肠和胆总管(CBD)的研究。系统分析纳入了27项队列研究,这些研究报告了针对良性肿瘤的胰头有限切除情况。在亚组分析中,另外评估了12项队列研究,以比较包括十二指肠段切除的全胰头切除(DPPHR-S)和保留十二指肠及CBD的全胰头切除(DPPHR-T)后的术后发病率。

结果

503例患者中,339例(67.4%)接受了全胰头切除。其中147例患者(29.2%)接受了十二指肠和CBD的节段性切除(DPPHR-S),192例患者(38.2%)接受了十二指肠和CBD的保留。164例患者接受了部分胰头切除(32.6%)。503例患者中的338例(67.2%)最终组织学诊断为囊性肿瘤,53例患者(10.3%)为神经内分泌肿瘤,20例患者(4.0%)为低风险壶腹周围癌。490例患者中有62例(12.7%)发生严重术后并发症,295例患者中有40例(13.6%)发生B+C级胰瘘,2.7%的患者接受了再次手术,12.3%的患者出现胃排空延迟。90天死亡率为0.4%。比较143例DPPHR-S患者和95例DPPHR-T患者的亚组分析显示,与手术相关的胆道并发症发生率分别为0.7%(143例患者中的1例)和8.4%(95例患者中的8例)(p≤0.0032),十二指肠并发症发生率分别为0和6.3%(95例患者中的6例)(p≤0.0037)。与DPPHR-T相比,DPPHR-S的胃排空延迟发生率更高(18.9%对2.1%,p≤0.0001)。

结论

保留实质的胰头良性肿瘤有限切除可保留功能性胰腺和十二指肠组织,就B+C级胰瘘发生率、再次手术、再次住院和90天死亡率而言,术后并发症风险较低。亚组分析显示,与全胰头切除联合十二指肠壶腹周围段切除及胰内CBD切除相比,保留十二指肠和CBD的全胰头切除与手术相关的胆道和十二指肠并发症显著增加相关。

相似文献

1
Parenchyma-Sparing, Limited Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Tumors and Low-Risk Periampullary Cancer--a Systematic Review.保留实质的局限性胰头切除术治疗良性肿瘤和低风险壶腹周围癌——一项系统评价
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan;20(1):206-17. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2981-2. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
2
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic resection versus pancreaticoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis.保留十二指肠的胰腺切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗慢性胰腺炎的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 3;2(2):CD011521. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011521.pub2.
3
Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign and Premalignant Tumors-a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Surgery-Associated Morbidity.保留十二指肠的胰头切除术治疗良恶性肿瘤:手术相关并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Nov;27(11):2611-2627. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05789-4. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
4
Surgical strategies in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.慢性胰腺炎治疗中的手术策略:随机对照试验的最新系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(9):e6220. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006220.
5
Long-Term Oncologic Outcome following Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Tumors, Cystic Neoplasms, and Neuroendocrine Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保留十二指肠的胰头切除术治疗良性肿瘤、囊性肿瘤和神经内分泌肿瘤后的长期肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4637-4653. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15222-y. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
6
Stapler versus scalpel resection followed by handsewn closure of the pancreatic remnant for distal pancreatectomy.在远端胰腺切除术中,吻合器与手术刀切除后手工缝合胰腺残端的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 10;6(6):CD008688. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008688.pub3.
7
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.保留十二指肠的胰头切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗慢性胰腺炎的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Surg. 2008 Jun;247(6):950-61. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181724ee7.
8
Duodenum-preserving total and partial pancreatic head resection for benign tumors--systematic review and meta-analysis.保留十二指肠的全胰头和胰头部分切除术治疗良性肿瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pancreatology. 2015 Mar-Apr;15(2):167-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
9
The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.微创与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗非胰腺壶腹周围癌的临床意义:系统评价和个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Aug 15;408(1):311. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03047-4.
10
[Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection : A local parenchyma-sparing treatment of benign and premalignant tumors of the pancreatic head].保留十二指肠的胰头切除术:一种保留局部实质的胰头良性及癌前肿瘤治疗方法
Chirurg. 2019 Sep;90(9):736-743. doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-0942-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent trends in organ-preserving pancreatectomy: Its problems and clinical advantages compared with other standard pancreatectomies.保留器官的胰腺切除术的最新趋势:与其他标准胰腺切除术相比的问题及临床优势。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 Oct 8;8(1):8-20. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12746. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection.保留十二指肠的胰头切除术的临床结果。
BMC Surg. 2023 Sep 21;23(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02170-9.
3
How to implement minimally invasive duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection for patients with pancreatic head lesions: A retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Duodenum-preserving total and partial pancreatic head resection for benign tumors--systematic review and meta-analysis.保留十二指肠的全胰头和胰头部分切除术治疗良性肿瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pancreatology. 2015 Mar-Apr;15(2):167-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
2
Limited surgery for benign tumours of the pancreas: a systematic review.胰腺良性肿瘤的有限手术:一项系统评价
World J Surg. 2015 Jun;39(6):1557-66. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2976-x.
3
Duodenum-preserving resection and Roux-en-Y pancreatic jejunostomy in benign pancreatic head tumors.
如何为胰腺头部病变患者实施微创保留十二指肠全胰头切除术:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 4;102(31):e34608. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034608.
4
Agenesis of Dorsal Pancreas and Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor: Ventral Pancreas Preserving Portal Vein Resection and Reconstruction Using a Peritoneal Graft.背侧胰腺缺如与实性假乳头状肿瘤:保留腹侧胰腺的门静脉切除及使用腹膜移植物重建术
Cureus. 2023 Jun 25;15(6):e40916. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40916. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of surgical outcomes.保留十二指肠的胰头切除术与胰十二指肠切除术的比较:手术结局的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 29;10:1107613. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1107613. eCollection 2023.
6
Preoperative 3D reconstruction and fluorescent indocyanine green for laparoscopic duodenum preserving pancreatic head resection: A case report.术前三维重建及荧光吲哚菁绿在腹腔镜保留十二指肠胰头切除术中的应用:1例病例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Feb 6;11(4):903-908. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i4.903.
7
Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Periampullary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A SEER Database Analysis.基于 SEER 数据库的胰周神经内分泌肿瘤预后列线图的建立与验证
Curr Oncol. 2022 Dec 26;30(1):344-357. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30010028.
8
Laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection with real-time indocyanine green guidance of different dosage and timing: enhanced safety with visualized biliary duct and its long-term metabolic morbidity.腹腔镜保留十二指肠胰头切除术联合实时吲哚菁绿指导不同剂量和时间:可视化胆管增强安全性及其长期代谢发病率。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov;407(7):2823-2832. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02570-0. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
9
Fate of Surgical Patients with Small Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An International Study Using Multi-Institutional Registries.小型无功能胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤手术患者的转归:一项使用多机构登记处的国际研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;14(4):1038. doi: 10.3390/cancers14041038.
10
Protective effects of farnesyltransferase inhibitor on sepsis-induced morphological aberrations of mitochondria in muscle and increased circulating mitochondrial DNA levels in mice.法尼基转移酶抑制剂对脓毒症诱导的小鼠肌肉线粒体形态异常和循环中线粒体 DNA 水平升高的保护作用。
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021 Jun 4;556:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.03.141. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
保留十二指肠的切除术及Roux-en-Y胰空肠吻合术治疗胰腺头部良性肿瘤
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 28;20(44):16786-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16786.
4
Incidence and severity of pancreatogenic diabetes after pancreatic resection.胰腺切除术后胰源性糖尿病的发病率和严重程度。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Feb;19(2):217-25. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2669-z. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
5
Short- and long-term outcomes of pancreatectomy with or without biliary tract and duodenum preservation for benign and borderline neoplasms.保留或不保留胆道及十二指肠的胰腺切除术治疗良性及交界性肿瘤的短期和长期结局
Dig Surg. 2014;31(3):233-41. doi: 10.1159/000365294. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
6
Dysplasia at the surgical margin is associated with recurrence after resection of non-invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.手术切缘的异型增生与非浸润性导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤切除后的复发有关。
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Oct;15(10):814-21. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12137. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
7
Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.神经内分泌肿瘤管理与治疗的共识指南。
Pancreas. 2013 May;42(4):557-77. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31828e34a4.
8
Modified duodenum-preserving pancreas head resection for low-grade malignant lesion in the pancreatic head.改良保留十二指肠的胰头切除术治疗胰头部低度恶性肿瘤。
Pancreatology. 2013 Mar-Apr;13(2):170-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
9
The impact of vascular resection on early postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.血管切除对胰十二指肠切除术后早期术后结果的影响:美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划数据库分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4068-77. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2585-y. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
10
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection vs. pancreatoduodenectomy for benign lesions and low-grade malignancies of the pancreatic head.保留十二指肠的胰头切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰头良性病变和低度恶性肿瘤的比较
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Jan-Feb;60(121):19-22. doi: 10.5754/hge12407.