Berti Andrew D, Theisen Erin, Sauer John-Demian, Nonejuie Poochit, Olson Joshua, Pogliano Joseph, Sakoulas George, Nizet Victor, Proctor Richard A, Rose Warren E
Pharmacy Practice Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Nov 2;60(1):451-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02071-15. Print 2016 Jan.
The activity of daptomycin (DAP) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is enhanced in the presence of β-lactam antibiotics. This effect is more pronounced with β-lactam antibiotics that exhibit avid binding to penicillin binding protein 1 (PBP1). Here, we present evidence that PBP1 has a significant role in responding to DAP-induced stress on the cell. Expression of the pbpA transcript, encoding PBP1, was specifically induced by DAP exposure whereas expression of pbpB, pbpC, and pbpD, encoding PBP2, PBP3, and PBP4, respectively, remained unchanged. Using a MRSA COL strain with pbpA under an inducible promoter, increased pbpA transcription was accompanied by reduced susceptibility to, and killing by, DAP in vitro. Exposure to β-lactams that preferentially inactivate PBP1 was not associated with increased DAP binding, suggesting that synergy in the setting of anti-PBP1 pharmacotherapy results from increased DAP potency on a per-molecule basis. Combination exposure in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model system with β-lactams that preferentially inactivate PBP1 (DAP-meropenem [MEM] or DAP-imipenem [IPM]) resulted in more-rapid killing than did combination exposure with DAP-nafcillin (NAF) (nonselective), DAP-ceftriaxone (CRO) or DAP-cefotaxime (CTX) (PBP2 selective), DAP-cefaclor (CEC) (PBP3 selective), or DAP-cefoxitin (FOX) (PBP4 selective). Compared to β-lactams with poor PBP1 binding specificity, exposure of S. aureus to DAP plus PBP1-selective β-lactams resulted in an increased frequency of septation and cell wall abnormalities. These data suggest that PBP1 activity may contribute to survival during DAP-induced metabolic stress. Therefore, targeted inactivation of PBP1 may enhance the antimicrobial efficiency of DAP, supporting the use of DAP-β-lactam combination therapy for serious MRSA infections, particularly when the β-lactam undermines the PBP1-mediated compensatory response.
在β-内酰胺类抗生素存在的情况下,达托霉素(DAP)对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的活性增强。对于与青霉素结合蛋白1(PBP1)具有强结合力的β-内酰胺类抗生素,这种效应更为明显。在此,我们提供证据表明PBP1在应对DAP诱导的细胞应激中起重要作用。编码PBP1的pbpA转录本的表达在暴露于DAP时被特异性诱导,而分别编码PBP2、PBP3和PBP4的pbpB、pbpC和pbpD的表达保持不变。使用在可诱导启动子控制下带有pbpA的MRSA COL菌株,pbpA转录增加伴随着体外对DAP的敏感性降低和被DAP杀灭的能力下降。暴露于优先使PBP1失活的β-内酰胺类抗生素与DAP结合增加无关,这表明在抗PBP1药物治疗中协同作用是由于DAP每分子的效力增加所致。在体外药代动力学/药效学模型系统中,与优先使PBP1失活的β-内酰胺类抗生素(DAP-美罗培南[MEM]或DAP-亚胺培南[IPM])联合暴露导致的杀菌速度比与DAP-萘夫西林(NAF)(非选择性)、DAP-头孢曲松(CRO)或DAP-头孢噻肟(CTX)(PBP2选择性)、DAP-头孢克洛(CEC)(PBP3选择性)或DAP-头孢西丁(FOX)(PBP4选择性)联合暴露更快。与PBP1结合特异性差的β-内酰胺类抗生素相比,金黄色葡萄球菌暴露于DAP加PBP1选择性β-内酰胺类抗生素会导致分隔频率增加和细胞壁异常。这些数据表明PBP1活性可能有助于在DAP诱导的代谢应激期间存活。因此,靶向使PBP1失活可能会提高DAP的抗菌效率,支持将DAP-β-内酰胺联合疗法用于严重的MRSA感染,特别是当β-内酰胺破坏PBP1介导的代偿反应时。