Lopes Pinheiro Melissa A, Kooij Gijs, Mizee Mark R, Kamermans Alwin, Enzmann Gaby, Lyck Ruth, Schwaninger Markus, Engelhardt Britta, de Vries Helga E
Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Bern, Theodor Kocher Institut, Freiestrasse 1, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Mar;1862(3):461-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
Each year about 650,000 Europeans die from stroke and a similar number lives with the sequelae of multiple sclerosis (MS). Stroke and MS differ in their etiology. Although cause and likewise clinical presentation set the two diseases apart, they share common downstream mechanisms that lead to damage and recovery. Demyelination and axonal injury are characteristics of MS but are also observed in stroke. Conversely, hallmarks of stroke, such as vascular impairment and neurodegeneration, are found in MS. However, the most conspicuous common feature is the marked neuroinflammatory response, marked by glia cell activation and immune cell influx. In MS and stroke the blood-brain barrier is disrupted allowing bone marrow-derived macrophages to invade the brain in support of the resident microglia. In addition, there is a massive invasion of auto-reactive T-cells into the brain of patients with MS. Though less pronounced a similar phenomenon is also found in ischemic lesions. Not surprisingly, the two diseases also resemble each other at the level of gene expression and the biosynthesis of other proinflammatory mediators. While MS has traditionally been considered to be an autoimmune neuroinflammatory disorder, the role of inflammation for cerebral ischemia has only been recognized later. In the case of MS the long track record as neuroinflammatory disease has paid off with respect to treatment options. There are now about a dozen of approved drugs for the treatment of MS that specifically target neuroinflammation by modulating the immune system. Interestingly, experimental work demonstrated that drugs that are in routine use to mitigate neuroinflammation in MS may also work in stroke models. Examples include Fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, and antibodies blocking the leukocyte integrin VLA-4. Moreover, therapeutic strategies that were discovered in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the animal model of MS, turned out to be also effective in experimental stroke models. This suggests that previous achievements in MS research may be relevant for stroke. Interestingly, the converse is equally true. Concepts on the neurovascular unit that were developed in a stroke context turned out to be applicable to neuroinflammatory research in MS. Examples include work on the important role of the vascular basement membrane and the BBB for the invasion of immune cells into the brain. Furthermore, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), the only established drug treatment in acute stroke, modulates the pathogenesis of MS. Endogenous tPA is released from endothelium and astroglia and acts on the BBB, microglia and other neuroinflammatory cells. Thus, the vascular perspective of stroke research provides important input into the mechanisms on how endothelial cells and the BBB regulate inflammation in MS, particularly the invasion of immune cells into the CNS. In the current review we will first discuss pathogenesis of both diseases and current treatment regimens and will provide a detailed overview on pathways of immune cell migration across the barriers of the CNS and the role of activated astrocytes in this process. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Neuro Inflammation edited by Helga E. de Vries and Markus Schwaninger.
每年约有65万欧洲人死于中风,另有相当数量的人生活在多发性硬化症(MS)的后遗症中。中风和MS在病因上有所不同。尽管病因以及临床表现使这两种疾病有所区别,但它们具有导致损伤和恢复的共同下游机制。脱髓鞘和轴突损伤是MS的特征,但在中风中也可观察到。相反,中风的标志,如血管损伤和神经退行性变,在MS中也存在。然而,最显著的共同特征是明显的神经炎症反应,其特征是胶质细胞活化和免疫细胞流入。在MS和中风中,血脑屏障被破坏,使得骨髓来源的巨噬细胞侵入大脑以支持驻留的小胶质细胞。此外,自身反应性T细胞大量侵入MS患者的大脑。虽然在缺血性病变中这种现象不太明显,但也能观察到。毫不奇怪,这两种疾病在基因表达水平和其他促炎介质的生物合成方面也彼此相似。传统上,MS被认为是一种自身免疫性神经炎症性疾病,而炎症在脑缺血中的作用直到后来才被认识到。就MS而言,作为神经炎症性疾病的长期研究记录在治疗选择方面取得了成果。现在有大约十二种批准用于治疗MS的药物,它们通过调节免疫系统来特异性地靶向神经炎症。有趣的是,实验工作表明,常用于减轻MS中神经炎症的药物在中风模型中也可能有效。例子包括芬戈莫德、醋酸格拉替雷以及阻断白细胞整合素VLA - 4的抗体。此外,在MS的动物模型实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎(EAE)中发现的治疗策略在实验性中风模型中也被证明是有效的。这表明MS研究中的先前成果可能与中风相关。有趣的是,反之亦然。在中风背景下发展起来的神经血管单元概念被证明适用于MS的神经炎症研究。例子包括关于血管基底膜和血脑屏障在免疫细胞侵入大脑中的重要作用的研究。此外,组织纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)是急性中风中唯一已确立的药物治疗方法,它调节MS的发病机制。内源性tPA从内皮细胞和星形胶质细胞释放,并作用于血脑屏障、小胶质细胞和其他神经炎症细胞。因此,中风研究的血管视角为内皮细胞和血脑屏障如何调节MS中的炎症,特别是免疫细胞侵入中枢神经系统的机制提供了重要的见解。在本综述中,我们将首先讨论这两种疾病的发病机制和当前的治疗方案,并将详细概述免疫细胞穿过中枢神经系统屏障的迁移途径以及活化星形胶质细胞在此过程中的作用。本文是由Helga E. de Vries和Markus Schwaninger编辑的名为《神经炎症》的特刊的一部分。