Caird Jeff K
University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Hum Factors. 2015 Dec;57(8):1325-7. doi: 10.1177/0018720815575942.
The body of research on cognitive distraction while driving is vast and spans many decades. To this research, the authors of the target article add three experiments that measure a number of cognitive tasks across laboratory, simulation, and on-road contexts. The pattern of decrements is similar across contexts, when expressed as an index, and when compared to previous research. Measurement, task, and generalizability issues arise from the approaches taken by the authors. For example, the use of "pure" cognitive tasks may not necessarily generalize to everyday driving behavior, wherein visual and physical distractions are inherently interleaved with cognitive tasks. A valuable contribution of the authors' future research on cognitive distractions would be to predict relative crash risk.
关于驾驶时认知分心的研究数量众多,且跨越了数十年。针对这项研究,目标文章的作者增加了三个实验,这些实验在实验室、模拟和实际道路环境中测量了多项认知任务。当以指数形式表示并与先前的研究进行比较时,不同环境下的下降模式是相似的。作者采用的方法引发了测量、任务和普遍性等问题。例如,使用“纯粹”的认知任务不一定能推广到日常驾驶行为中,在日常驾驶行为中,视觉和身体分心与认知任务本质上是交织在一起的。作者未来关于认知分心的研究的一个有价值的贡献将是预测相对碰撞风险。