Strayer David L, Cooper Joel M
University of Utah, Salt Lake City
University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Hum Factors. 2015 Dec;57(8):1343-7. doi: 10.1177/0018720815610668.
We address several themes that emerged in the commentaries related to our target article. First, we consider the relationship between cognitive distraction and crash risk. Second, we discuss the development of our cognitive distraction scale. Third, we weigh issues of self-regulation, appropriate baselines, and satisficing. Finally, we identify several areas where additional research is needed to refine our understanding of driver distraction and crash risk.
我们探讨了评论中出现的与我们的目标文章相关的几个主题。首先,我们考虑认知分心与撞车风险之间的关系。其次,我们讨论了我们的认知分心量表的开发。第三,我们权衡自我调节、适当基线和满足现状的问题。最后,我们确定了几个需要进一步研究以完善我们对驾驶员分心和撞车风险理解的领域。