Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Landeskrankenhaus, Feldkirch, Vorarlberg, Austria.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Feb 26;2(2):2325967114523902. doi: 10.1177/2325967114523902. eCollection 2014 Feb.
Optimal treatment of superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears is controversial, in part because the dynamic role of the long head of the biceps muscle (LHBM) in the glenohumeral joint is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine dynamic LHBM behavior during shoulder activity by studying (1) the electromyographic activity of the LHBM during shoulder motion, (2) the effect of elbow immobilization on this activity, and (3) the effect of a load applied to the distal humerus on this activity.
The LHBM would not play a significant role in active glenohumeral range of motion.
Controlled laboratory study.
Thirteen normal volunteers underwent surface electromyography (EMG) measurement of the LHBM, short head biceps muscle (SHBM), deltoid, infraspinatus, and brachioradialis during shoulder motion from the neutral position (0° of rotation, flexion, and abduction) to 45° of flexion, 90° of flexion, 45° of abduction, and 90° of abduction. These motions were repeated both with and without splint immobilization of the forearm and elbow at 100° of flexion and neutral rotation and with and without a 1-kg weight placed on the lateral distal humerus.
Mean EMG activity within the LHBM and the SHBM was low (≤11.6% ± 9.1%). LHBM activity was significant increased by flexion and abduction (P < .049 in all cases), while SHBM activity was not. EMG activity from the middle head of the deltoid was significantly increased by loading with the shoulder positioned away from the body (ie, in abduction or flexion). When compared with the unloaded state, the addition of a distal humeral load significantly increased LHBM activity in 45° of abduction (P = .028) and 90° of flexion (P = .033) despite forearm and elbow immobilization. The SHBM showed similar trends.
In normal volunteers with forearm and elbow immobilization and application of a load to the distal humerus, LHBM EMG activity is increased by both glenohumeral flexion and abduction, suggesting that this muscle plays a dynamic role in glenohumeral motion with higher demand activities.
Biceps tenodesis may result in dynamic change within the glenohumeral joint with higher demand activities.
肩盂上唇前后(SLAP)撕裂的最佳治疗方法存在争议,部分原因是长头肱二头肌(LHBM)在盂肱关节中的动态作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过研究(1)肩运动过程中 LHBM 的肌电图活动,(2)肘固定对该活动的影响,(3)施加在肱骨远端的负荷对该活动的影响,来确定 LHBM 在肩部活动中的动态行为。
LHBM 在主动盂肱活动范围中不会起重要作用。
对照实验室研究。
13 名正常志愿者在肩部运动过程中接受了 LHBM、短头肱二头肌(SHBM)、三角肌、冈下肌和肱桡肌的表面肌电图(EMG)测量,从中立位(旋转 0°、前屈和外展)到 45°前屈、90°前屈、45°外展和 90°外展。这些运动在 100°前屈和中立位旋转时,在前臂和肘部用夹板固定,以及在肱骨远端外侧施加 1kg 重物的情况下,都重复进行了测量。
LHBM 和 SHBM 内的平均 EMG 活动很低(≤11.6%±9.1%)。LHBM 活动在前屈和外展时显著增加(所有情况下均 P<.049),而 SHBM 活动则没有。当肩部远离身体(即外展或前屈)放置时,三角肌中部的 EMG 活动显著增加。与未加载状态相比,即使在前臂和肘部固定且施加肱骨远端负荷的情况下,在 45°外展(P=.028)和 90°前屈(P=.033)时,LHBM 活动显著增加。SHBM 也表现出类似的趋势。
在前臂和肘部固定并在肱骨远端施加负荷的正常志愿者中,LHBM 的 EMG 活动在前屈和外展时都增加,这表明该肌肉在高需求活动的盂肱运动中发挥着动态作用。
二头肌肌腱固定术可能会导致高需求活动时盂肱关节内的动态变化。