Department of Clinical Chemistry and Transfusion Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Sep 24;2(9):2325967114550781. doi: 10.1177/2325967114550781. eCollection 2014 Sep.
There is a need for tools to predict the chondrogenic potency of autologous cells for cartilage repair.
To evaluate previously proposed chondrogenic biomarkers and to identify new biomarkers in the chondrocyte transcriptome capable of predicting clinical success or failure after autologous chondrocyte implantation.
Controlled laboratory study and case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Five patients with clinical improvement after autologous chondrocyte implantation and 5 patients with graft failures 3 years after implantation were included. Surplus chondrocytes from the transplantation were frozen for each patient. Each chondrocyte sample was subsequently thawed at the same time point and cultured for 1 cell doubling, prior to RNA purification and global microarray analysis. The expression profiles of a set of predefined marker genes (ie, collagen type II α1 [COL2A1], bone morphogenic protein 2 [BMP2], fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 [FGFR3], aggrecan [ACAN], CD44, and activin receptor-like kinase receptor 1 [ACVRL1]) were also evaluated.
No significant difference in expression of the predefined marker set was observed between the success and failure groups. Thirty-nine genes were found to be induced, and 38 genes were found to be repressed between the 2 groups prior to autologous chondrocyte implantation, which have implications for cell-regulating pathways (eg, apoptosis, interleukin signaling, and β-catenin regulation).
No expressional differences that predict clinical outcome could be found in the present study, which may have implications for quality control assessments of autologous chondrocyte implantation. The subtle difference in gene expression regulation found between the 2 groups may strengthen the basis for further research, aiming at reliable biomarkers and quality control for tissue engineering in cartilage repair.
The present study shows the possible limitations of using gene expression before transplantation to predict the chondrogenic and thus clinical potency of the cells. This result is especially important as the chondrogenic potential of the chondrocytes is currently part of quality control measures according to European and American legislations regarding advanced therapies.
需要有工具来预测自体细胞的软骨生成能力,以用于软骨修复。
评估先前提出的软骨生成生物标志物,并在软骨细胞转录组中鉴定新的生物标志物,以预测自体软骨细胞移植后的临床成功或失败。
对照实验室研究和病例对照研究;证据水平,3 级。
纳入 5 例自体软骨细胞移植后临床改善的患者和 5 例移植后 3 年出现移植物失败的患者。每位患者的移植剩余软骨细胞均被冷冻保存。随后,在同一时间点解冻每个软骨细胞样本,在进行 RNA 纯化和全基因组微阵列分析之前进行 1 个细胞倍增培养。还评估了一组预设标记基因(即,Ⅱ型胶原α1[COL2A1]、骨形态发生蛋白 2[BMP2]、成纤维细胞生长因子受体 3[FGFR3]、聚集蛋白聚糖[ACAN]、CD44 和激活素受体样激酶受体 1[ACVRL1])的表达谱。
在成功组和失败组之间,未观察到预定标记基因集的表达存在显著差异。在自体软骨细胞移植前,两组之间有 39 个基因被诱导,38 个基因被抑制,这与细胞调节途径(如凋亡、白细胞介素信号转导和β-连环蛋白调节)有关。
本研究未发现可预测临床结果的表达差异,这可能对自体软骨细胞移植的质量控制评估具有重要意义。两组之间发现的基因表达调控的细微差异可能为进一步的研究提供更坚实的基础,目的是为软骨修复的组织工程寻找可靠的生物标志物和质量控制方法。
本研究表明,在移植前使用基因表达来预测细胞的软骨生成能力和因此的临床疗效可能存在局限性。这一结果尤为重要,因为根据欧洲和美国关于先进疗法的法规,目前将细胞的软骨生成潜能纳入质量控制措施中。