Buttgereit Frank, Kent Jeffrey D, Holt Robert J, Grahn Amy Y, Rice Patricia, Alten Rieke, Yazici Yusuf
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Jul;73(3):168-77.
Morning stiffness, a common patient reported symptom in rheumatoid arthritis, is associated with an increase in early morning inflammatory cytokines and significant disability. Little is known about categorical morning stiffness responses to glucocorticoid use in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Chronic pain threshold models have indicated previously that response rates of 15% to 30% indicate minimally important relief, 40% to 50% indicate substantial pain relief, and greater than 70% represents extensive pain relief. The objective of the present analysis was to assess differences in the percentages of patients achieving 25%(minimally important change), 50% (substantial change), and 75% (extensive change) reduction in the duration of patient-reported morning stiffness between patients receiving DR- and IR-prednisone in the Circadian Administration of Prednisone in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAPRA-1) trial.
The CAPRA-1 trial was a 12-week, double-blind study followed by an additional 9-month open-label extension. Patients in the CAPRA-1 trial were randomized to IR-prednisone in the morning or DR-prednisone at bedtime in addition to stable disease modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. After the double-blind phase, patients randomized to IR-prednisone (N =110) were switched to DR-prednisone and followed at 3, 6, and 9 months in an open-label extension phase. Patients originally randomized to DR-prednisone (N = 97) continued that therapy in the open-label extension. Patient morning stiffness diary entries from 4 weeks before and 4 weeks after each scheduled visit were analyzed over 1 year for threshold response. The number of patients reaching threshold response (25%, 50%, and 75% improvement) and time to morning stiffness response were examined.
The DR-prednisone arm had significantly more responders in all three morning stiffness threshold response categories at the end of the double-blind period compared with IR-prednisone (p ≤ 0.05). Patients who switched from IR- to DR-prednisone in the open-label extension had comparable responses in all categories within 3 months and significantly shorter time to response versus patients already receiving DR-prednisone.
DR-prednisone produced significantly higher morning stiffness response rates compared with IR prednisone, as defined by 25%, 50%, and 75% improvement thresholds, at week 12. The time to reach these thresholds was quicker with DR-prednisone, and patients who switched to DR-prednisone from IR-prednisone achieved responses comparable to the continuous DR-prednisone group over 9 months of therapy. This analysis is the first to assess time-to-event and percentage threshold morning stiffness responses to differently timed glucocorticoid therapy and propose clinically meaningful response rates in RA patients.
晨僵是类风湿关节炎患者常见的症状,与清晨炎症细胞因子增加及严重功能障碍相关。对于类风湿关节炎患者使用糖皮质激素后晨僵的分类反应了解甚少。慢性疼痛阈值模型先前表明,15%至30%的反应率表示有最小程度的重要缓解,40%至50%表示疼痛有实质性缓解,大于70%表示疼痛有广泛缓解。本分析的目的是评估在类风湿关节炎泼尼松昼夜给药(CAPRA - 1)试验中,接受速释(DR)和缓释(IR)泼尼松治疗的患者在患者报告的晨僵持续时间减少25%(最小重要变化)、50%(实质性变化)和75%(广泛变化)方面的患者百分比差异。
CAPRA - 1试验是一项为期12周的双盲研究,随后还有9个月的开放标签延长期。CAPRA - 1试验中的患者除接受稳定的改善病情抗风湿药物治疗外,被随机分为早晨服用IR - 泼尼松或睡前服用DR - 泼尼松。双盲期结束后,随机分配至IR - 泼尼松组(N = 110)的患者换用DR - 泼尼松,并在开放标签延长期的3、6和9个月进行随访。最初随机分配至DR - 泼尼松组(N = 97)的患者在开放标签延长期继续接受该治疗。对每次预定访视前4周和后4周患者的晨僵日记记录进行了为期1年的阈值反应分析。检查达到阈值反应(改善25%、50%和75%)的患者数量以及晨僵反应时间。
与IR - 泼尼松相比,双盲期结束时,DR - 泼尼松组在所有三个晨僵阈值反应类别中的反应者显著更多(p≤0.05)。在开放标签延长期从IR - 泼尼松换用DR - 泼尼松的患者在3个月内所有类别中的反应相当,且与已接受DR - 泼尼松治疗的患者相比,反应时间显著更短。
与IR - 泼尼松相比,DR - 泼尼松在第12周时产生的晨僵反应率显著更高,以改善25%、50%和75%的阈值来定义。达到这些阈值的时间使用DR - 泼尼松更快,并且从IR - 泼尼松换用DR - 泼尼松的患者在9个月的治疗中取得了与持续使用DR - 泼尼松组相当的反应。本分析首次评估了不同时间糖皮质激素治疗的事件发生时间和晨僵阈值百分比反应,并提出了类风湿关节炎患者具有临床意义的反应率。