Nakashima Hiroaki, Yukawa Yasutsugu, Suda Kota, Yamagata Masatsune, Ueta Takayoshi, Kato Fumihiko
*Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine†Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chubu Rosai Hospital‡Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hokkaido Chuo Rosai Hospital Sekison Center§Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Rosai Hospital¶Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spinal Injuries Center.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar;41(6):E342-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001255.
A cross-sectional study.
This study aims to investigate the correlation of the cervical canal and spinal cord size, and evaluate whether the size of the spinal cord relative to the spinal canal is a risk factor for development of cervical spinal cord compression (SCC).
There is little knowledge regarding the relationship between cervical bony canal and spinal cord diameters. Although developmental canal stenosis has been recognized as a risk factor for SCC, the size of the spinal cord relative to the spinal canal has not been similarly discussed.
Cervical canal anteroposterior (AP) diameters on X-rays and AP diameters and cross-sectional areas of dural sacs and spinal cords on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were measured in 1211 healthy volunteers. Correlation between cervical canal diameter on X-rays and AP diameter and cross-sectional area of dural sacs and spinal cords on MRI were assessed. The ratio of the AP diameter of the spinal cord/dural sac was compared between subjects with and without SCC.
Spinal canal diameters were not highly correlated with spinal cord AP diameters and cross-sectional areas, although spinal canal diameters were significantly correlated with dural sac AP diameters. The individual difference in the ratio of the AP diameter of the spinal cord/dural sac was large (35%-93%), and the ratio was significantly larger in the subjects with SCC. An AP diameter ratio more than 62% at the C2 to C3 disc level is a risk factor for developing SCC.
The spinal cord diameter was independent of the spinal canal diameter and the relative size of a spinal cord and spinal canal differed on an individual basis. In addition, the ratio of spinal cord/dural sac in subjects with SCC was significantly larger. Therefore, a relatively large spinal cord could be a risk factor for SCC.
横断面研究。
本研究旨在调查颈椎管与脊髓大小的相关性,并评估脊髓相对于椎管的大小是否为颈椎脊髓压迫症(SCC)发生的危险因素。
关于颈椎骨性椎管与脊髓直径之间的关系,人们了解甚少。尽管发育性椎管狭窄已被认为是SCC的一个危险因素,但脊髓相对于椎管的大小尚未得到类似的讨论。
对1211名健康志愿者进行X线颈椎管前后径测量以及磁共振成像(MRI)下硬脊膜囊和脊髓的前后径及横截面积测量。评估X线颈椎管直径与MRI下硬脊膜囊和脊髓的前后径及横截面积之间的相关性。比较有和没有SCC的受试者之间脊髓/硬脊膜囊前后径比值。
椎管直径与脊髓前后径及横截面积并非高度相关,尽管椎管直径与硬脊膜囊前后径显著相关。脊髓/硬脊膜囊前后径比值的个体差异很大(35% - 93%),且在患有SCC的受试者中该比值显著更大。在C2至C3椎间盘水平,前后径比值超过62%是发生SCC的一个危险因素。
脊髓直径独立于椎管直径,且脊髓与椎管的相对大小存在个体差异。此外,患有SCC的受试者中脊髓/硬脊膜囊的比值显著更大。因此,相对较大的脊髓可能是SCC的一个危险因素。