• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伯格默和恩利希(2012年)的直接复制与概念性复制:力量对运动表现可能几乎没有影响。

Direct and Conceptual Replications of Burgmer & Englich (2012): Power May Have Little to No Effect on Motor Performance.

作者信息

Cusack Margaret, Vezenkova Nadya, Gottschalk Christopher, Calin-Jageman Robert J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Dominican University, River Forest, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0140806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140806. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0140806
PMID:26536592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4633206/
Abstract

Burgmer and Englich (2012) have reported that manipulating feelings of power can substantially improve performance on two motor tasks: golf and darts. We conducted two high-powered direct replications of the effects of power on golf, two online conceptual replications using mirror-tracing as a performance measure, and an additional conceptual replication using a cognitive performance measure (word-search). Overall, we found little to no effect of power on motor skill (d = 0.09, 95% CI[-0.07, 0.22], n = 603). We varied task difficulty, re-analyzed data without participants showing weak responses on manipulation checks, and tried adjusting performance scores for age, gender, and initial task skill. None of these secondary analyses revealed a strong effect of power on performance. A meta-analysis integrating our data with Burgmer & Englich leaves open the possibility that manipulating power could provide a modest boost in motor skill (d = 0.19, 95% CI [0.001, 0.38], n = 685). Unfortunately, the pattern of performance changes we observed was unrelated to group differences in perceived and rated power, suggesting that what motor effects do occur with this protocol may not be directly related to the construct of power. [Burgmer, P., &Englich, B. (2012). Bullseye!: How Power Improves Motor Performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(2), 224-232.].

摘要

伯格默和恩利希(2012年)报告称,操控权力感能显著提高高尔夫和飞镖这两项运动任务的表现。我们对权力对高尔夫影响进行了两次强有力的直接复制研究,使用镜像追踪作为表现指标进行了两次在线概念性复制研究,以及使用一项认知表现指标(单词搜索)进行了一次额外的概念性复制研究。总体而言,我们发现权力对运动技能几乎没有影响(d = 0.09,95%置信区间[-0.07, 0.22],n = 603)。我们改变了任务难度,在排除在操控检验中反应较弱的参与者后重新分析数据,并尝试针对年龄、性别和初始任务技能调整表现得分。这些二次分析均未揭示权力对表现有强烈影响。一项将我们的数据与伯格默和恩利希的数据整合的元分析表明,操控权力有可能适度提升运动技能(d = 0.19,95%置信区间[0.001, 0.38],n = 685)。不幸的是,我们观察到的表现变化模式与感知和评定权力的组间差异无关,这表明该实验方案所产生的运动效应可能与权力结构并无直接关联。[伯格默,P.,&恩利希,B.(2012年)。《正中靶心!:权力如何提升运动表现》。《社会心理与人格科学》,4(2),224 - 232。]

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/a48f0ff43ba2/pone.0140806.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/41f10b1d5ba7/pone.0140806.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/6e3ccdb7de49/pone.0140806.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/df67557f1f27/pone.0140806.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/cd8ac539552f/pone.0140806.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/bb07b4fd457a/pone.0140806.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/a48f0ff43ba2/pone.0140806.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/41f10b1d5ba7/pone.0140806.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/6e3ccdb7de49/pone.0140806.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/df67557f1f27/pone.0140806.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/cd8ac539552f/pone.0140806.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/bb07b4fd457a/pone.0140806.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5413/4633206/a48f0ff43ba2/pone.0140806.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Direct and Conceptual Replications of Burgmer & Englich (2012): Power May Have Little to No Effect on Motor Performance.伯格默和恩利希(2012年)的直接复制与概念性复制:力量对运动表现可能几乎没有影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0140806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140806. eCollection 2015.
2
Preparation for action: psychophysiological activity preceding a motor skill as a function of expertise, performance outcome, and psychological pressure.行动准备:作为专业技能、表现结果和心理压力函数的运动技能之前的心理生理活动。
Psychophysiology. 2014 Apr;51(4):374-84. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12182. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
3
Cognitive processes among skilled miniature golf players: effects of instructions on motor performance, concentration time, and perceived difficulty.
Scand J Psychol. 1991;32(4):344-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1991.tb00885.x.
4
The impact of visual illusions on perception, action planning, and motor performance.视觉错觉对感知、行动规划和运动表现的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):830-4. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0489-y.
5
Location versus task relevance: The impact of differing internal focus of attention instructions on motor performance.位置与任务相关性:不同内部注意力焦点指令对运动表现的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 May;176:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
6
Perception and action in golf putting: skill differences reflect calibration.高尔夫推杆中的感知与动作:技能差异反映了校准。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011 Jun;33(3):349-69. doi: 10.1123/jsep.33.3.349.
7
Chasing the zone: Reduced beta power predicts baseball batting performance.追寻最佳状态:β波功率降低预示着棒球击球表现。
Neurosci Lett. 2018 Nov 1;686:150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
Premovement high-alpha power is modulated by previous movement errors: Indirect evidence to endorse high-alpha power as a marker of resource allocation during motor programming.运动前的高阿尔法波功率受先前运动误差的调节:支持将高阿尔法波功率作为运动编程期间资源分配标志的间接证据。
Psychophysiology. 2015 Jul;52(7):977-81. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12414. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
9
Age effects shrink when motor learning is predominantly supported by nondeclarative, automatic memory processes: evidence from golf putting.当运动学习主要由非陈述性、自动记忆过程支持时,年龄效应会减小:来自高尔夫推杆的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(1):25-38. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.588714. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
10
The Effect of Gradual Self-Control of Task Difficulty and Feedback on Learning Golf Putting.逐渐自我控制任务难度和反馈对学习高尔夫推杆的影响。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019 Dec;90(4):429-439. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1612510. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Generically partisan: Polarization in political communication.一般党派偏见:政治传播中的极化现象。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 21;120(47):e2309361120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309361120. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
2
Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief.热尔韦和诺伦扎扬(2012年)的直接复制研究:没有证据表明分析性思维会减少宗教信仰。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172636. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation.社会启发式影响直觉合作。
Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 22;5:3677. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4677.
2
Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers.亚马逊土耳其机器人工人的天真:对行为研究人员的后果和解决方案。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):112-30. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7.
3
Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.评估亚马逊土耳其机器人作为实验行为研究工具。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
4
The good life of the powerful: the experience of power and authenticity enhances subjective well-being.强者的美好生活:权力体验和真实感提升主观幸福感。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 1;24(3):280-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797612450891. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
5
Behavioral priming: it's all in the mind, but whose mind?行为启动:一切在心中,但又是谁的心中呢?
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029081. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
6
Feeling socially powerless makes you more prone to bumping into things on the right and induces leftward line bisection error.感到社会无力会使你更容易撞到右边的东西,并导致左侧线二分误差。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Dec;17(6):910-4. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.6.910.
7
Having the power to forgive: when the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness.拥有宽恕的力量:当权力体验增加时,人际宽恕也会增加。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Aug;36(8):1010-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167210376761.
8
The weirdest people in the world?世界上最奇怪的人?
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
9
Keep your fingers crossed!: how superstition improves performance.祝您好运!:迷信如何提高表现。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):1014-20. doi: 10.1177/0956797610372631. Epub 2010 May 28.
10
Why current publication practices may distort science.为何当前的出版行为可能会扭曲科学。
PLoS Med. 2008 Oct 7;5(10):e201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201.