• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全淋巴细胞计数和血清白蛋白作为手术患者营养风险的预测指标。

Total lymphocyte count and serum albumin as predictors of nutritional risk in surgical patients.

作者信息

Rocha Naruna Pereira, Fortes Renata Costa

机构信息

Programa de Residência em Nutrição Clínica, Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Secretaria de Estado de Saúde do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DC, Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015 Jul-Sep;28(3):193-6. doi: 10.1590/S0102-67202015000300012.

DOI:10.1590/S0102-67202015000300012
PMID:26537145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4737361/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early detection of changes in nutritional status is important for a better approach to the surgical patient. There are several nutritional measures in clinical practice, but there is not a complete method for determining the nutritional status, so, health professionals should only choose the best method to use.

AIM

To evaluate the total lymphocyte count and albumin as predictors of identification of nutritional risk in surgical patients.

METHODS

Prospective longitudinal study was conducted with 69 patients undergoing surgery of the gastrointestinal tract. The assessment of nutritional status was evaluated by objective methods (anthropometry and biochemical tests) and subjective methods (subjective global assessment).

RESULTS

All parameters used in the nutritional assessment detected a high prevalence of malnutrition, with the exception of BMI which detected only 7.2% (n=5). The albumin (p=0.01), the total lymphocytes count (p=0.02), the percentage of adequacy of skinfolds (p<0.002) and the subjective global assessment (p<0.001) proved to be useful as predictors of risk of postoperative complications, since the smaller the values of albumin and lymphocyte count and higher the score the subjective global assessment were higher risks of surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

A high prevalence of malnutrition was found, except for BMI. The use of albumin and total lymphocyte count were good predictor for the risk of postoperative complications and when used with other methods of assessing the nutritional status, such as the subjective global assessment and the percentage of adequacy of skinfolds, can be useful for identification of nutritional risk and postoperative complications.

摘要

背景

早期发现营养状况变化对于更好地治疗外科患者很重要。临床实践中有多种营养评估方法,但尚无完整的营养状况评估方法,因此,医疗专业人员应仅选择最佳方法使用。

目的

评估外周血淋巴细胞总数和白蛋白作为外科患者营养风险识别指标的价值。

方法

对69例接受胃肠道手术的患者进行前瞻性纵向研究。通过客观方法(人体测量和生化检测)和主观方法(主观全面评定法)评估营养状况。

结果

除BMI仅检测出7.2%(n = 5)的营养不良外,营养评估中使用的所有参数均检测出高比例的营养不良。白蛋白(p = 0.01)、外周血淋巴细胞总数(p = 0.02)、皮褶厚度充足率(p < 0.002)和主观全面评定法(p < 0.001)被证明可作为术后并发症风险的预测指标,因为白蛋白和淋巴细胞计数的值越小,主观全面评定法的评分越高,手术并发症风险就越高。

结论

除BMI外,发现营养不良的比例较高。白蛋白和外周血淋巴细胞总数是术后并发症风险的良好预测指标,与其他营养状况评估方法(如主观全面评定法和皮褶厚度充足率)一起使用时,可用于识别营养风险和术后并发症。

相似文献

1
Total lymphocyte count and serum albumin as predictors of nutritional risk in surgical patients.全淋巴细胞计数和血清白蛋白作为手术患者营养风险的预测指标。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015 Jul-Sep;28(3):193-6. doi: 10.1590/S0102-67202015000300012.
2
Prognostic Role of Serum Albumin, Total Lymphocyte Count, and Mini Nutritional Assessment on Outcomes After Geriatric Hip Fracture Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.血清白蛋白、总淋巴细胞计数和微型营养评估对老年髋部骨折手术后结局的预后作用:荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1287-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
3
Nutritional risk index is predictor of postoperative complications in operations of digestive system or abdominal wall?营养风险指数是消化系统或腹壁手术术后并发症的预测指标吗?
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(4):286-92. doi: 10.1590/s0102-67202013000400007.
4
The influence of nutritional status on complications after major intraabdominal surgery.营养状况对腹部大手术后并发症的影响。
J Am Coll Nutr. 2004 Jun;23(3):227-32. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2004.10719365.
5
Can Serum Albumin Level and Total Lymphocyte Count be Surrogates for Malnutrition to Predict Wound Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty?血清白蛋白水平和总淋巴细胞计数能否作为营养不良的替代指标来预测全膝关节置换术后的伤口并发症?
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1317-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
6
Comparison of two nutrition assessment tools in surgical elderly inpatients in Northern China.中国北方老年外科住院患者两种营养评估工具的比较
Nutr J. 2015 Jul 14;14:68. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0054-8.
7
Effective nutritional status screening in orthopaedic oncology patients and post-operative complications.骨科肿瘤患者的有效营养状况筛查与术后并发症
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 May-Aug;27(2):2309499019847232. doi: 10.1177/2309499019847232.
8
The value of nutritional assessment in the surgical patient.营养评估在外科手术患者中的价值。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1985 Mar-Apr;9(2):170-2. doi: 10.1177/0148607185009002170.
9
Nutritional assessment and prognosis of oral cancer patients: a large-scale prospective study.口腔癌患者的营养评估和预后:一项大规模前瞻性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Feb 22;20(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6604-2.
10
A prospective assessment of nutritional status and complications in patients with fractures of the hip.
J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4(1):49-57. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199003000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Crohn's Disease Patients Referred for Home Parenteral Nutrition-A Comprehensive Analysis of 18 Years' Experience at a National Reference Centre.转诊接受家庭肠外营养的克罗恩病患者——国立参考中心18年经验的综合分析
Nutrients. 2025 May 16;17(10):1697. doi: 10.3390/nu17101697.
2
Role of the Lymphocyte Count-to-C-Reactive Protein Ratio in the Risk Stratification for High EASE Scores After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.淋巴细胞计数与C反应蛋白比值在活体肝移植后高EASE评分风险分层中的作用:一项回顾性观察队列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 2;13(23):7344. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237344.
3
Nutritional responsiveness affects novel neutrophil parameters and reduces in-hospital mortality and costs in elective cancer oesophagectomy - a single centre, prospective, observational study.营养反应性影响新型中性粒细胞参数,并降低择期食管癌切除术患者的住院死亡率和成本——一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2024;56(1):77-82. doi: 10.5114/ait.2024.136013.
4
A combined nomogram based on radiomics and hematology to predict the pathological complete response of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.基于放射组学和血液学的联合列线图预测食管鳞癌新辅助免疫化疗的病理完全缓解。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12239-0.
5
Prognostic potential of nutritional risk screening and assessment tools in predicting survival of patients with pancreatic neoplasms: a systematic review.营养风险筛查和评估工具对预测胰腺肿瘤患者生存预后的预测价值:系统综述。
Nutr J. 2024 Feb 3;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-00920-w.
6
Nutritional intervention for the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma chemoradiotherapy patients: A meta-analysis.营养干预对鼻咽癌放化疗患者预后的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 13;102(41):e35386. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035386.
7
Correlation between branched-chain amino acids intake and total lymphocyte count in head and neck cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.头颈部癌患者支链氨基酸摄入量与总淋巴细胞计数之间的相关性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nutr. 2023 Jul 14;9(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40795-023-00746-5.
8
Predictive value of nutritional indicators with regard to the survival outcomes in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with camrelizumab.卡瑞利珠单抗治疗转移性食管鳞状细胞癌患者时营养指标对生存结局的预测价值
Oncol Lett. 2023 Apr 3;25(5):198. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.13784. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Prediction and clinical impact of delayed lymphopenia after chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.局部晚期非小细胞肺癌放化疗后迟发性淋巴细胞减少的预测及临床影响
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 18;12:891221. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.891221. eCollection 2022.
10
Non-Invasive Prediction Models for Esophageal Varices and Red Signs in Patients With Hepatitis B Virus-Related Liver Cirrhosis.乙型肝炎病毒相关肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张和红色征的非侵入性预测模型
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Jul 12;9:930762. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.930762. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of biochemical and immunological parameters in nutritional screening and assessment.生化和免疫参数在营养筛查与评估中的应用。
Nutr Hosp. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):594-601. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000300024.
2
[Prevalence and factors associated to malnutrition in patients admitted to a medium-long stay hospital].[中长期住院患者营养不良的患病率及相关因素]
Nutr Hosp. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):369-75. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000200019.
3
A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: Nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention in adults.美国肠外及肠内营养学会临床指南:成人营养筛查、评估及干预
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011 Jan;35(1):16-24. doi: 10.1177/0148607110389335.
4
[Reliability of the classification of nutritional status obtained through the BMI and three different methods of body fat percentage in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus].[通过体重指数(BMI)和三种不同体脂百分比测量方法得出的1型糖尿病患者营养状况分类的可靠性]
Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2009 Apr;53(3):360-7. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302009000300011.
5
[The effect of surgical and nutritional treatment on activation parameters of peripheral blood T lymphocytes in stomach cancer patients in postoperative period].[手术及营养治疗对胃癌患者术后外周血T淋巴细胞活化参数的影响]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2008 Mar;24(141):231-6.
6
[Critical revision of the available methods for evaluate the body composition in population-based and clinical studies].[对基于人群和临床研究中评估身体成分的现有方法的批判性修订]
Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2007 Dec;57(4):327-34.
7
Is malnutrition still a risk factor of postoperative complications in gastric cancer surgery?营养不良仍是胃癌手术术后并发症的危险因素吗?
Clin Nutr. 2008 Jun;27(3):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
8
[Are the tools recommended by ASPEN and ESPEN comparable for assessing the nutritional status?].[美国肠外肠内营养学会(ASPEN)和欧洲临床营养与代谢学会(ESPEN)推荐的用于评估营养状况的工具具有可比性吗?]
Nutr Hosp. 2005 Jul-Aug;20(4):259-67.
9
[Subjective nutrition assessment: Part 1 - A review of its validity after two decades of use].[主观营养评估:第1部分——使用二十年后对其有效性的综述]
Arq Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul-Sep;39(3):181-7. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032002000300009. Epub 2003 May 21.
10
Hospital malnutrition: the Brazilian national survey (IBRANUTRI): a study of 4000 patients.医院营养不良:巴西全国性调查(IBRANUTRI):一项对4000名患者的研究。
Nutrition. 2001 Jul-Aug;17(7-8):573-80. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(01)00573-1.