Braune Stephan, Burchardi Hilmar, Engel Markus, Nierhaus Axel, Ebelt Henning, Metschke Maria, Rosseau Simone, Kluge Stefan
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
, Bovenden, Germany.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Nov 4;15:160. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0139-0.
To evaluate the economic implications of the pre-emptive use of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with hypercapnic ventilatory insufficiency failing non-invasive ventilation (NIV).
Retrospective ancillary cost analysis of data extracted from a recently published multicentre case-control-study (n = 42) on the use of arterio-venous ECCO2R to avoid IMV in patients with acute on chronic ventilatory failure. Cost calculations were based on average daily treatment costs for intensive care unit (ICU) and normal medical wards as well as on the specific costs of the ECCO2R system.
In the group treated with ECCO2R IMV was avoided in 90 % of cases and mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was shorter than in the matched control group treated with IMV (23.0 vs. 42.0 days). The overall average hospital treatment costs did not differ between the two groups (41.134 vs. 39.366 €, p = 0.8). A subgroup analysis of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) revealed significantly lower median ICU length of stay (11.0 vs. 35.0 days), hospital length of stay (17.5 vs. 51.5 days) and treatment costs for the ECCO2R group (19.610 vs. 46.552 €, p = 0.01).
Additional costs for the use of arterio-venous ECCO2R to avoid IMV in patients with acute-on-chronic ventilatory insufficiency failing NIV may be offset by a cost reducing effect of a shorter length of ICU and hospital stay.
评估在无创通气(NIV)失败的高碳酸血症性通气不足患者中,预先使用体外二氧化碳清除(ECCO2R)以避免有创机械通气(IMV)的经济影响。
对最近发表的一项多中心病例对照研究(n = 42)中提取的数据进行回顾性辅助成本分析,该研究是关于使用动静脉ECCO2R避免慢性通气衰竭急性加重患者的IMV。成本计算基于重症监护病房(ICU)和普通病房的平均每日治疗成本以及ECCO2R系统的特定成本。
在接受ECCO2R治疗的组中,90%的病例避免了IMV,平均住院时间(LOS)短于接受IMV治疗的匹配对照组(23.0天对42.0天)。两组的总体平均住院治疗成本无差异(41,134欧元对39,366欧元,p = 0.8)。对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的亚组分析显示,ECCO2R组的ICU中位住院时间(11.0天对35.0天)、住院时间(17.5天对51.5天)和治疗成本显著更低(19,610欧元对46,552欧元,p = 0.01)。
对于NIV失败的慢性通气衰竭急性加重患者,使用动静脉ECCO2R避免IMV的额外成本可能会被ICU和住院时间缩短带来的成本降低效应所抵消。