Nicareta Jean Ricardo, de Freitas Alexandre Coutinho Teixeira, Nicareta Sheyla Maris, Nicareta Cleiton, Campos Antonio Carlos Ligocki, Nassif Paulo Afonso Nunes, Marchesini João Batista
Surgery Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):73-8. doi: 10.1590/S0102-6720201500S100020.
Although it has received several criticisms, which is considered to be the most effective method used for global assessment of morbid obesity surgical treatment, still needs to be updated.
Critical analysis of BAROS constitution and method.
BAROS as headings was searched in literature review using data from the main bariatric surgery journals until 2009.
Where found and assessed 121 papers containing criticisms on BAROS constitution and methodology. It has some failures and few researches show results on the use of this instrument, although it is still considered a standard method. Several authors that used it found imperfections in its methodology and suggested some changes addressed to improving its acceptance, showing the need of developing new methods to qualify the bariatric surgery results.
BAROS constitution has failures and its methodology needs to be updated.
尽管它受到了一些批评，但被认为是用于病态肥胖手术治疗全球评估的最有效方法，仍需要更新。
对BAROS的构成和方法进行批判性分析。
在文献综述中，以BAROS为标题，使用来自主要减肥手术期刊的数据进行检索，直至2009年。
共找到并评估了121篇包含对BAROS构成和方法批评的论文。它存在一些缺陷，尽管它仍被视为标准方法，但很少有研究展示该工具的使用结果。几位使用它的作者发现其方法存在缺陷，并建议进行一些改进以提高其认可度，这表明需要开发新的方法来评估减肥手术的结果。
BAROS的构成存在缺陷，其方法需要更新。
