Schneider Christine, Joos Stefanie, Bozorgmehr Kayvan
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 4;5(11):e008784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008784.
To assess disparities in health and healthcare between asylum seekers (AS) and residents in Germany as a proof of concept using European Core Health Indicators (ECHI).
Population-based cross-sectional feasibility study.
All AS (aged 18 years or above) registered in three counties in Germany during a 3-month study period (N=1017). Cross-sectional data on the resident population were taken from the German Health Interview (2008-2011, N=8152), and the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (2012, N=23,065).
Self-reported health status and healthcare access (utilisation and unmet medical need) in line with ECHI.
Inequalities in health and access to healthcare were quantified both by crude and age-stratified/sex-stratified ORs with 95% CI using cross-tabulations.
A total of N=156 AS (15.34%) participated in the study. Compared with residents, AS were significantly more likely to report a bad health status (OR=1.72 (1.23 to 2.41)), activity limitations (OR=1.97 (1.39 to 2.79)) or (only younger age groups) any chronic morbidity (18-24 years: OR=6.23 (2.62 to 14.57); 25-49 years: OR=2.05 (1.23 to 3.37)). AS had significantly lower odds for consulting any physician (OR=0.1 (0.07 to 0.16)) or general practitioners (OR=0.44 (0.31 to 0.62)), but higher odds for hospital admissions (OR=2.29 (1.54 to 3.34)), visits to psychotherapists (OR=4.07 (2.48 to 6.43)) and unmet needs (OR=3.74 (2.62 to 5.21)). The direction of healthcare-related associations was consistent across all strata despite variation in magnitude and statistical significance.
Quantifying disparities between AS and the resident population by means of selected ECHI proved to be feasible. The approach yielded first quantitative evidence for disparities in health and access to healthcare in the German context. Further research is needed to generate representative estimates, for example, by including AS in national health monitoring programmes.
使用欧洲核心健康指标(ECHI)评估德国寻求庇护者(AS)与居民之间的健康及医疗保健差异,作为概念验证。
基于人群的横断面可行性研究。
在为期3个月的研究期间,德国三个县登记的所有18岁及以上的寻求庇护者(N = 1017)。居民人口的横断面数据来自德国健康访谈(2008 - 2011年,N = 8152)以及欧盟收入和生活条件统计数据(2012年,N = 23065)。
根据ECHI自行报告的健康状况和医疗保健获取情况(利用情况和未满足的医疗需求)。
使用交叉表,通过粗率以及年龄分层/性别分层的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)对健康及医疗保健获取方面的不平等进行量化。
共有156名寻求庇护者(15.34%)参与了研究。与居民相比,寻求庇护者更有可能报告健康状况差(OR = 1.72(1.23至2.41))、活动受限(OR = 1.97(1.39至2.79))或(仅年轻年龄组)任何慢性疾病(18 - 24岁:OR = 6.23(2.62至14.57);25 - 49岁:OR = 2.05(1.23至3.37))。寻求庇护者咨询任何医生(OR = 0.1(0.07至0.16))或全科医生(OR = 0.44(0.31至0.62))的几率显著较低,但住院几率(OR = 2.29(1.54至3.34))、拜访心理治疗师(OR = 4.07(2.48至6.43))和未满足需求(OR = 3.74(2.62至5.21))的几率较高。尽管程度和统计显著性存在差异,但所有阶层中与医疗保健相关关联的方向是一致的。
通过选定的ECHI量化寻求庇护者与居民人口之间的差异被证明是可行且有效的。该方法首次提供了德国背景下健康及医疗保健获取方面差异的定量证据。需要进一步研究以得出具有代表性的估计值,例如,将寻求庇护者纳入国家健康监测计划。