• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BRAVO食管pH监测:对于疑似胃食管反流,比经验性药物治疗更具成本效益。

BRAVO esophageal pH monitoring: more cost-effective than empiric medical therapy for suspected gastroesophageal reflux.

作者信息

Afaneh Cheguevara, Zoghbi Veronica, Finnerty Brendan M, Aronova Anna, Kleiman David, Ciecierega Thomas, Crawford Carl, Fahey Thomas J, Zarnegar Rasa

机构信息

Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 294, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3454-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4629-4. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-015-4629-4
PMID:26537906
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Early referral for catheter-based esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than empiric proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We hypothesize that BRAVO wireless pH monitoring will also demonstrate substantial cost-savings compared to empiric PPI therapy, given its superior sensitivity and comfort.

METHODS

We reviewed 100 consecutive patients who underwent wireless pH monitoring for suspected GERD at our institution. A cost model and a cost equivalence calculation were generated. Cost-saving analyses were performed for both esophageal and extraesophageal symptoms.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were available for analysis. Median PPI use prior to referral was 215 weeks (range 0-520). Forty-three patients (49 %) had BRAVO results diagnosing GERD; 98 % of these had esophageal symptoms. Patients with negative BRAVO studies had a median of 113 (0-520) weeks of unnecessary PPI therapy. Cost-savings ranged from $1048 to $15,853 per patient, depending on sensitivity (75-95 %), PPI dosage, and brand. Maximum cost-savings occurred in patients with extraesophageal symptoms ($2948-$31,389 per patient). The PPI cost equivalence of BRAVO placement was 36 and 6 weeks for low- and high-dose therapy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BRAVO wireless pH testing is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric medical management for GERD and should be incorporated early in the treatment algorithm.

摘要

引言

对于诊断胃食管反流病(GERD),早期转诊进行基于导管的食管pH监测比经验性质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗更具成本效益。我们推测,鉴于BRAVO无线pH监测具有更高的灵敏度和舒适度,与经验性PPI治疗相比,它也将显示出可观的成本节约。

方法

我们回顾了在我们机构接受疑似GERD无线pH监测的100例连续患者。生成了一个成本模型和成本等效性计算。对食管和食管外症状均进行了成本节约分析。

结果

87例患者可供分析。转诊前PPI使用的中位数为215周(范围0 - 520周)。43例患者(49%)BRAVO结果诊断为GERD;其中98%有食管症状。BRAVO研究结果为阴性的患者不必要的PPI治疗中位数为113周(0 - 520周)。每位患者的成本节约范围为1048美元至15853美元,具体取决于灵敏度(75% - 95%)、PPI剂量和品牌。食管外症状患者的成本节约最大(每位患者2948美元至31389美元)。BRAVO放置的PPI成本等效性对于低剂量和高剂量治疗分别为36周和6周。

结论

对于GERD,BRAVO无线pH检测比长期经验性药物治疗更具成本效益,应在治疗方案中尽早采用。

相似文献

1
BRAVO esophageal pH monitoring: more cost-effective than empiric medical therapy for suspected gastroesophageal reflux.BRAVO食管pH监测:对于疑似胃食管反流,比经验性药物治疗更具成本效益。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3454-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4629-4. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
2
Early referral for esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric trials of proton-pump inhibitors for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.对于疑似胃食管反流病,早期转介进行食管 pH 监测比长期经验性质子泵抑制剂试验更具成本效益。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jan;18(1):26-33; discussion 33-4. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2327-x. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
3
Gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptom recurrence in patients discontinuing proton pump inhibitors for Bravo wireless esophageal pH monitoring study.用于Bravo无线食管pH监测研究的停用质子泵抑制剂患者的胃食管反流病相关症状复发情况
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2017 Oct-Dec;82(4):277-286. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
4
Impedance-pH monitoring on medications does not reliably confirm the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients referred for antireflux surgery.药物阻抗-pH 监测并不能可靠地确认接受反流手术治疗的患者存在胃食管反流病。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):889-894. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5759-7. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
5
Long-term wireless pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: prolonging the test beyond 48 hours is unnecessary and may be misleading.远端食管的长期无线pH监测:将测试延长至48小时以上没有必要,而且可能会产生误导。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Oct 1;30(10):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox069.
6
Laboratory based investigations for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease.基于实验室的胃食管反流病诊断研究。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;24(6):787-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.10.005.
7
Multimodality evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms who have failed empiric proton pump inhibitor therapy.胃食管反流病症状患者经经验性质子泵抑制剂治疗失败后的多模态评估。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul;26(5):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01381.x. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
8
Drawbacks of the Current Algorithm for Patients With Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and the Impact of Adding Wireless pH Study to the Initial Diagnostic Endoscopy: Data From High-Volume Rural Antireflux Center.
Am Surg. 2020 May;86(5):422-428. doi: 10.1177/0003134820921181.
9
Rethinking the laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment algorithm: Evaluating an alternate empiric dosing regimen and considering up-front, pH-impedance, and manometry testing to minimize cost in treating suspect laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.重新思考喉咽反流治疗方案:评估一种替代的经验性给药方案,并考虑采用预先的pH阻抗测试和测压测试,以尽量降低疑似喉咽反流疾病的治疗成本。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127 Suppl 6:S1-S13. doi: 10.1002/lary.26806. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
10
Timely confirmation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease via pH monitoring: estimating budget impact on managed care organizations.通过pH监测及时确诊胃食管反流病:评估对管理式医疗组织的预算影响
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 May;24(5):1317-27. doi: 10.1185/030079908x280680. Epub 2008 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease - a systematic review of cost-effectiveness and economic burden.胃食管反流病患者的诊断和治疗——成本效益和经济负担的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):1351. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11781-8.
2
The Cost Effectiveness of Adjunctive Treatments for Proton Pump Inhibitor-Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.质子泵抑制剂难治性胃食管反流病辅助治疗的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Sep;44(9):703-714. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01387-7. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
3
Predictive Factors for Developing GERD After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Is Preoperative Endoscopy Necessary?

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病的流行病学
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;43(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
2
Early referral for esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric trials of proton-pump inhibitors for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.对于疑似胃食管反流病,早期转介进行食管 pH 监测比长期经验性质子泵抑制剂试验更具成本效益。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jan;18(1):26-33; discussion 33-4. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2327-x. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
3
Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.
袖状胃切除术后发生胃食管反流病的预测因素:术前内镜检查是否必要?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 May;26(5):1015-1020. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05207-7. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
4
Ambulatory Reflux Monitoring Guides Proton Pump Inhibitor Discontinuation in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms: A Clinical Trial.动态反流监测指导胃食管反流症状患者停用质子泵抑制剂:一项临床试验
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jan;160(1):174-182.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Use of Esophageal pH Monitoring to Minimize Proton-Pump Inhibitor Utilization in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms.使用食管 pH 监测以最小化质子泵抑制剂在胃食管反流症状患者中的应用。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Oct;63(10):2673-2680. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5183-4. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
胃食管反流病的流行病学更新:系统评价。
Gut. 2014 Jun;63(6):871-80. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304269. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
4
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病诊断和管理指南
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):308-28; quiz 329. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.444. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
5
Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update.美国胃肠道疾病负担:2012 年更新。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-1187.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
6
Wireless pH capsule--yield in clinical practice.无线 pH 胶囊——临床实践中的成果。
Endoscopy. 2012 Mar;44(3):270-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291541. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
7
Prolonged, wireless pH-studies have a high diagnostic yield in patients with reflux symptoms and negative 24-h catheter-based pH-studies.对于有反流症状且 24 小时基于导管 pH 研究为阴性的患者,长时间、无线 pH 研究具有较高的诊断收益。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011 May;23(5):419-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01663.x. Epub 2011 Jan 16.
8
Management of esophageal perforation after therapeutic endoscopy.治疗性内镜检查后食管穿孔的管理
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2010 Jun;6(6):391-2.
9
Patient acceptance and clinical impact of Bravo monitoring in patients with previous failed catheter-based studies.既往基于导管的研究失败的患者对Bravo监测的接受度及临床影响。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Mar 15;29(6):669-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03923.x. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
10
Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal diseases.美国消化系统疾病负担 第一部分:总体及上消化道疾病
Gastroenterology. 2009 Feb;136(2):376-86. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Jan 3.