El Camino GI Medical Associates, Mountain View, California, USA.
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul;26(5):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01381.x. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
Patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), such as chest pain, heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia, are typically treated initially with a course of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The evaluation of patients who have either not responded at all or partially and inadequately responded to such therapy requires a more detailed history and may involve an endoscopy and esophageal biopsies, followed by esophageal manometry, ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, and gastric emptying scanning. To assess the merits of a multimodality 'structural' and 'functional' assessment of the esophagus in patients who have inadequately controlled GERD symptoms despite using empiric PPI, a retrospective cohort study of patients without any response or with poor symptomatic control to empiric PPI (>2 months duration) who were referred to an Esophageal Studies Unit was conducted. Patients were studied using symptom questionnaires, endoscopy (+ or - for erosive disease, or Barrett's metaplasia) and multilevel esophageal biopsies (eosinophilia, metaplasia), esophageal motility (aperistalsis, dysmotility), 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring (+ if % total time pH < 4 > 5%), and gastric emptying scanning (+ if >10% retention at 4 hours and >70% at 2 hours). Over 3 years, 275 patients (147 men and 128 women) aged 16-89 years underwent complete multimodality testing. Forty percent (n= 109) had nonerosive reflux disease (esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD]-, biopsy-, pH+); 19.3% (n= 53) had erosive esophagitis (EGD+); 5.5% (n= 15) Barrett's esophagus (EGD+, metaplasia+); 5.5% (n= 15) eosinophilic esophagitis (biopsy+); 2.5% (n= 7) had achalasia and 5.8% (n= 16) other dysmotility (motility+, pH-); 16% (n= 44) had functional heartburn (EGD-, pH-), and 5.8% (n= 16) had gastroparesis (gastric scan+). Cumulative symptom scores for chest pain, heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia were similar among the groups (mean range 1.1-1.35 on a 0-3 scale). Multimodality evaluation changed the diagnosis of GERD in 34.5% of cases and led to or guided alternative therapies in 42%. Overlap diagnoses were frequent: 10/15 (67%) of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, 12/16 (75%) of patients with gastroparesis, and 11/23 (48%) of patients with achalasia or dysmotility had concomitant pathologic acid reflux by pH studies. Patients with persistent GERD symptoms despite empiric PPI therapy benefit from multimodality evaluation that may change the diagnosis and guide therapy in more than one third of such cases. Because symptoms are not specific and overlap diagnoses are frequent and multifaceted, objective evidence-driven therapies should be considered in such patients.
有胃食管反流病(GERD)症状的患者,如胸痛、烧心、反流和吞咽困难,通常首先接受质子泵抑制剂(PPI)疗程治疗。对那些完全或部分无反应或反应不足的患者,需要更详细的病史,并可能涉及内镜检查和食管活检,随后进行食管测压、动态食管 pH 监测和胃排空扫描。为了评估在使用经验性 PPI 治疗后 GERD 症状仍未得到充分控制的患者中,多模态“结构”和“功能”食管评估的优点,对没有任何反应或对经验性 PPI 治疗反应不佳(>2 个月)的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。这些患者被转诊到食管研究单位,使用症状问卷、内镜(有或无糜烂性疾病或 Barrett 化生)和多水平食管活检(嗜酸性粒细胞增多、化生)、食管动力(无蠕动、动力障碍)、24 小时动态食管 pH 监测(如果 %总时间 pH < 4 > 5%,则为阳性)和胃排空扫描(如果 4 小时时>10%滞留,2 小时时>70%,则为阳性)进行研究。在 3 年期间,275 名(147 名男性和 128 名女性)年龄在 16-89 岁的患者接受了完整的多模态检查。40%(n=109)患有非糜烂性反流病(内镜检查[EGD]-,活检-,pH+);19.3%(n=53)患有糜烂性食管炎(EGD+);5.5%(n=15)患有 Barrett 食管(EGD+,化生+);5.5%(n=15)患有嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(活检+);2.5%(n=7)患有贲门失弛缓症和 5.8%(n=16)患有其他动力障碍(动力障碍+,pH-);16%(n=44)患有功能性烧心(EGD-,pH-),5.8%(n=16)患有胃轻瘫(胃扫描+)。胸痛、烧心、反流和吞咽困难的累积症状评分在各组之间相似(0-3 量表上的平均值范围为 1.1-1.35)。多模态评估改变了 34.5%的 GERD 诊断,并导致或指导了 42%的替代治疗。重叠诊断很常见:10/15(67%)嗜酸粒细胞性食管炎患者、12/16(75%)胃轻瘫患者和 11/23(48%)贲门失弛缓症或动力障碍患者的 pH 研究均存在病理性酸反流。尽管接受了经验性 PPI 治疗,但仍有持续性 GERD 症状的患者受益于多模态评估,这可能改变三分之一以上此类患者的诊断并指导治疗。由于症状不特异且重叠诊断频繁且多方面,因此应考虑对这些患者进行基于客观证据的治疗。