Apfelbacher Christian, Frew Edward, Xiang Ally, Apfel Alex, Smith Helen
a Division of Public Health and Primary Care , Brighton and Sussex Medical School , Brighton , UK and.
b Department of Medical Sociology , Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg , Regensburg , Germany.
J Asthma. 2016;53(4):363-73. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1099161. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
In epidemiological studies that aim to investigate the relationship between pet exposure and allergy/asthma, pet exposure is often ascertained by means of a questionnaire, but it is unclear which questionnaire items are used. The objective of this study was to systematically review self-reported pet exposure assessment in questionnaires used in epidemiological studies which explore the associations between pets and allergy/asthma.
A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and papers were selected according to pre-specified eligibility criteria. The pet exposure questions used were classified within a framework including direct pet contact, indirect pet contact (e.g. through carers or grandparents) and avoidance behaviour. Authors were contacted when the questions used were not reported in detail.
Ninety-six full text papers were systematically reviewed. All studies assessed direct pet contact, but less than half (45%) explicitly assessed whether pets were allowed indoors. The vast majority of studies assessed both pet exposures during the first year of life and after the first year of life. The minority (13%) assessed whether pet(s) were kept at places regularly visited by the child and pet exposure in utero (15%). Even fewer studies assessed indirect contact to pets (n = 8) and avoidance behaviour (n = 10).
In epidemiological studies, the ascertainment of pet exposure through questionnaires appears to vary greatly. This variation might partly explain the inconsistent and contradictory results of the effects of pet exposure on the development of allergy and asthma.
在旨在调查宠物接触与过敏/哮喘之间关系的流行病学研究中,宠物接触情况通常通过问卷来确定,但不清楚使用了哪些问卷项目。本研究的目的是系统回顾在探索宠物与过敏/哮喘之间关联的流行病学研究中所使用问卷里自我报告的宠物接触评估情况。
在PubMed中进行了系统的文献检索,并根据预先指定的纳入标准选择论文。所使用的宠物接触问题在一个框架内进行分类,该框架包括直接宠物接触、间接宠物接触(例如通过照顾者或祖父母)和回避行为。当所使用的问题未详细报告时,会与作者联系。
对96篇全文论文进行了系统回顾。所有研究都评估了直接宠物接触,但不到一半(45%)的研究明确评估了宠物是否被允许进入室内。绝大多数研究评估了生命第一年期间和生命第一年之后的宠物接触情况。少数研究(13%)评估了宠物是否养在孩子经常去的地方以及子宫内的宠物接触情况(15%)。评估间接宠物接触(n = 8)和回避行为(n = 10)的研究更少。
在流行病学研究中,通过问卷确定宠物接触情况的方式似乎差异很大。这种差异可能部分解释了宠物接触对过敏和哮喘发展影响的不一致和相互矛盾的结果。