Rhee Chin Kook, Chang Jung Hyun, Choi Eu Gene, Kim Hyun Kuk, Kwon Yong-Soo, Kyung Sun Young, Lee Ji-Hyun, Park Myung Jae, Yoo Kwang Ha, Oh Yeon Mok
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Oct 22;10:2265-75. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S90948. eCollection 2015.
A new quinolone, zabofloxacin, has now been developed; hence, a non-inferiority trial is needed to compare this new compound with another widely used quinolone to examine its efficacy and safety for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, Phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial designed to compare oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) with moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation. In all, 345 COPD patients with a moderate COPD exacerbation were enrolled in the study via the outpatient clinics at 31 university hospitals. Clinical per protocol analysis revealed that the clinical cure rate for zabofloxacin was 86.7% and that for moxifloxacin was 86.3% (the rate difference, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval, -7.7%-8.6%). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed clinical cure rates of 77.1% and 77.3% (difference, -0.2%; 95% confidence interval, -9.0%-8.8%), respectively. These results confirm that zabofloxacin is not inferior to moxifloxacin. The favorable microbiological response rate for zabofloxacin was 67.4% and that for moxifloxacin was 79.5% (P=0.22). Patients in the zabofloxacin group showed better patient-oriented outcomes, as measured by EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool-Patient-Reported Outcome and the COPD assessment test scores, than patients in the moxifloxacin group. Adverse drug reactions related to zabofloxacin occurred in 9.7% of cases and those related to moxifloxacin occurred in 9.6% of cases (P=0.97). The dropout rate due to adverse events was 0% (0/175) in the zabofloxacin group and 1.8% (3/167) in the moxifloxacin group (P=0.12). Oral zabofloxacin (367 mg once daily for 5 days) was not inferior to oral moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily for 7 days) for the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbation.
一种新型喹诺酮类药物——扎氟沙星现已研发出来;因此,需要进行一项非劣效性试验,将这种新化合物与另一种广泛使用的喹诺酮类药物进行比较,以检验其治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重的疗效和安全性。这是一项前瞻性、多中心、双盲、双模拟、随机、对照、平行组、III期非劣效性临床试验,旨在比较口服扎氟沙星(每日一次,367毫克,共5天)与莫西沙星(每日一次,400毫克,共7天)治疗COPD急性加重患者的效果。共有345例中度COPD急性加重患者通过31所大学医院的门诊诊所纳入本研究。按方案进行的临床分析显示,扎氟沙星的临床治愈率为86.7%,莫西沙星为86.3%(率差为0.4%;95%置信区间为-7.7%-8.6%)。意向性分析显示临床治愈率分别为77.1%和77.3%(差异为-0.2%;95%置信区间为-9.0%-8.8%)。这些结果证实扎氟沙星不劣于莫西沙星。扎氟沙星的良好微生物学反应率为67.4%,莫西沙星为79.5%(P=0.22)。与莫西沙星组相比,扎氟沙星组患者在以患者为导向的结局方面表现更好,这通过慢性肺部疾病加重工具-患者报告结局和COPD评估测试得分来衡量。与扎氟沙星相关的药物不良反应发生在9.7%的病例中,与莫西沙星相关的发生在9.6%的病例中(P=0.97)。扎氟沙星组因不良事件导致的脱落率为0%(0/175),莫西沙星组为1.8%(3/167)(P=0.12)。口服扎氟沙星(每日一次,367毫克,共5天)治疗COPD急性加重患者不劣于口服莫西沙星(每日一次,400毫克,共7天)。