Hovenkamp-Hermelink Johanna Hm, Riese Harriëtte, van der Veen Date C, Batelaan Neeltje M, Penninx Brenda Wjh, Schoevers Robert A
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotional regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands.
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotional regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.035. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
Stability of diagnosis was listed as an important predictive validator for maintaining separate diagnostic classifications in DSM-5. The aim of this study is to examine the longitudinal stability of anxiety disorder diagnoses, and the difference in stability between subjects with a chronic versus a non-chronic course.
Longitudinal data of 447 subjects with a current pure anxiety disorder diagnosis at baseline from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety were used. At baseline, 2-, 4-, and 6-year follow-up mental disorders were assessed and numbers (and percentages) of transitions from one anxiety disorder diagnosis to another were determined for each anxiety disorder diagnosis separately and for subjects with a chronic (i.e. one or more anxiety disorder at every follow-up assessment) and a non-chronic course.
Transition percentages were high in all anxiety disorder diagnoses, ranging from 21.1% for social anxiety disorder to 46.3% for panic disorder with agoraphobia at six years of follow-up. Transition numbers were higher in the chronic than in the non-chronic course group (p=0.01).
Due to the 2 year sample frequency, the number of subjects with a chronic course may have been overestimated as intermittent recovery periods may have been missed.
These data indicate that anxiety disorder diagnoses are not stable over time. The validity of the different anxiety disorder categories is not supported by these longitudinal patterns, which may be interpreted as support for a more pronounced dimensional approach to the classification of anxiety disorders.
诊断稳定性被列为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)中维持单独诊断分类的一项重要预测验证指标。本研究旨在探讨焦虑症诊断的纵向稳定性,以及慢性病程与非慢性病程受试者在稳定性上的差异。
使用了荷兰抑郁与焦虑研究中447名在基线时被诊断为当前单纯焦虑症的受试者的纵向数据。在基线、随访2年、4年和6年时评估精神障碍情况,并分别针对每种焦虑症诊断以及慢性病程(即在每次随访评估中都有一种或多种焦虑症)和非慢性病程的受试者,确定从一种焦虑症诊断转变为另一种焦虑症诊断的人数(及百分比)。
在所有焦虑症诊断中,转变百分比都很高,随访6年时,社交焦虑症为21.1%,伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍为46.3%。慢性病程组的转变人数高于非慢性病程组(p = 0.01)。
由于样本频率为2年,慢性病程受试者的数量可能被高估了,因为可能遗漏了间歇性恢复期。
这些数据表明,焦虑症诊断随时间并不稳定。这些纵向模式不支持不同焦虑症类别的有效性,这可能被解释为支持对焦虑症分类采用更明显的维度方法。