Cuisinier Adrien, Schilte Clotilde, Declety Philippe, Picard Julien, Berger Karine, Bouzat Pierre, Falcon Dominique, Bosson Jean Luc, Payen Jean-François, Albaladejo Pierre
Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS-TIMC-IMAG UMR, 5525-Themas, Grenoble, France.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015 Dec;34(6):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
Medical competence requires the acquisition of theoretical knowledge and technical skills. Severe trauma management teaching is poorly developed during internship. Nevertheless, the basics of major trauma management should be acquired by every future physician. For this reason, the major trauma course (MTC), an educational course in major traumatology, has been developed for medical students. Our objective was to evaluate, via a high fidelity medical simulator, the impact of the MTC on medical student skills concerning major trauma management.
The MTC contains 3 teaching modalities: posters with associated audio-guides, a procedural workshop on airway management and a teaching session using a medical simulator. Skills evaluation was performed 1 month before (step 1) and 1 month after (step 3) the MTC (step 2). Nineteen students were individually evaluated on 2 different major trauma scenarios. The primary endpoint was the difference between steps 1 and 3, in a combined score evaluating: admission, equipment, monitoring and safety (skill set 1) and systematic clinical examinations (skill set 2).
After the course, the combined primary outcome score improved by 47% (P<0.01). Scenario choice or the order of use had no significant influence on the skill set evaluations.
This study shows improvement in student skills for major trauma management, which we attribute mainly to the major trauma course developed in our institution.
医学能力要求掌握理论知识和技术技能。实习期间严重创伤管理教学发展不佳。然而,每位未来的医生都应掌握重大创伤管理的基础知识。因此,为医学生开发了重大创伤课程(MTC),这是一门重大创伤学教育课程。我们的目标是通过高保真医学模拟器评估MTC对医学生重大创伤管理技能的影响。
MTC包含3种教学模式:配有相关音频指南的海报、气道管理程序工作坊以及使用医学模拟器的教学课程。在MTC之前1个月(步骤1)和之后1个月(步骤3)(步骤2)进行技能评估。19名学生在2种不同的重大创伤场景下接受单独评估。主要终点是在综合评分中步骤1和步骤3之间的差异,该综合评分评估:入院、设备、监测和安全(技能集1)以及系统临床检查(技能集2)。
课程结束后,综合主要结局评分提高了47%(P<0.01)。场景选择或使用顺序对技能集评估没有显著影响。
本研究表明学生在重大创伤管理方面的技能有所提高,我们主要将其归因于我们机构开发的重大创伤课程。