Onega Tracy, Reisch Lisa M, Frederick Paul D, Geller Berta M, Nelson Heidi D, Lott Jason P, Radick Andrea C, Elder David E, Barnhill Raymond L, Piepkorn Michael W, Elmore Joann G
Department of Biomedical Data Science, Department of Epidemiology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 2016 Apr;29(2):243-53. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9836-y.
Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation, with specific challenges for dermatopathology, yet little is known about pathologists' practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI for interpretation of melanocytic lesions. A national sample of pathologists (N = 207) was recruited from 864 invited pathologists from ten US states (CA, CT, HI, IA, KY, LA, NJ, NM, UT, and WA). Pathologists who had interpreted melanocytic lesions in the past year were surveyed in this cross-sectional study. The survey included questions on pathologists' experience, WSI practice patterns and perceptions using a 6-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists' use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were between 40 and 59 years of age (62%) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (71%). Use of WSI was seen more often among dermatopathologists and participants affiliated with an academic medical center. Experience with WSI was reported by 41%, with the most common type of use being for education and testing (CME, board exams, and teaching in general, 71%), and clinical use at tumor boards and conferences (44%). Most respondents (77%) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and 59% agreed that benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. However, 78% of pathologists reported that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (49%) or not (51%). The majority of pathologists who interpret melanocytic lesions do not use WSI, but among pathologists who do, use is largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.
数字全玻片成像(WSI)是一种用于病理学诊断的新兴技术,在皮肤病理学方面存在特定挑战,但对于病理学家在解读黑素细胞性病变时使用WSI的实践模式或看法却知之甚少。从美国十个州(加利福尼亚州、康涅狄格州、夏威夷州、爱荷华州、肯塔基州、路易斯安那州、新泽西州、新墨西哥州、犹他州和华盛顿州)的864名受邀病理学家中招募了一个全国性的病理学家样本(N = 207)。在这项横断面研究中,对过去一年中解读过黑素细胞性病变的病理学家进行了调查。该调查包括关于病理学家的经验、WSI实践模式以及使用6点李克特量表的看法等问题。通过描述性统计总结一致性,以描述病理学家对WSI的使用和看法。大多数参与调查的病理学家年龄在40至59岁之间(62%),且未隶属于学术医疗中心(71%)。皮肤病理学家和隶属于学术医疗中心的参与者更常使用WSI。41%的人报告有WSI使用经验,最常见的使用类型是用于教育和测试(继续医学教育、委员会考试以及一般教学,71%),以及在肿瘤病例讨论会和会议上的临床使用(44%)。大多数受访者(77%)同意使用该技术可以做出准确诊断,59%的人同意WSI的益处大于担忧。然而,78%的病理学家报告说数字切片用于常规临床解读速度太慢。对于是否愿意采用WSI,受访者意见平分秋色(49%愿意,51%不愿意)。大多数解读黑素细胞性病变的病理学家不使用WSI,但在使用WSI的病理学家中,主要用于继续医学教育、执照/委员会考试和教学。对WSI的积极看法略多于消极看法。随着传播的推进,了解WSI的实践模式可能有助于使看法与该技术的采用达成一致。