• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当代年度医院手术量对左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后结局的影响。

Impact of Annual Hospital Volume on Outcomes after Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Implantation in the Contemporary Era.

作者信息

Shah Neeraj, Chothani Ankit, Agarwal Vratika, Deshmukh Abhishek, Patel Nileshkumar, Garg Jalaj, Badheka Apurva, Martinez Matthew, Islam Nauman, Freudenberger Ronald

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania.

Department of Cardiology, Mount Sinai St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2016 Mar;22(3):232-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.10.016
PMID:26547012
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are few data in the literature regarding impact of annual hospital volume on outcomes such as mortality and length of stay (LOS) post-LVAD implantation.

METHODS

We queried the nationwide inpatient sample from 2008 to 2011 using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision procedure code 37.66. We included patients ≥18 years without primary diagnosis of orthotopic heart transplant. Annual volume of LVAD implantation was computed for each hospital. Multivariable hierarchical mixed effect logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality and LOS.

RESULTS

There were 1749 LVAD implants from 2008 to 2011; patients had a mean age of 55.4 years, and 23% were female. In-hospital mortality decreased from 20.9% in the first tertile (1-22 LVADs/y) to 13.7% in the third tertile (≥35 LVADs/y) of hospital volume. Median LOS decreased from 34 days in the first tertile to 28 days in third tertile of hospital volume. The adjusted odds ratios of the highest tertile of hospital volume in predicting in-hospital mortality and LOS were 0.41 (0.26-0.64, P < .001) and 0.41 (0.23-0.73, P = .003), respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis showed that a volume threshold of >20 LVADs/year was associated with favorable mortality rates of <10%.

CONCLUSIONS

High annual LVAD volume is associated with significantly decreased in-hospital mortality and LOS after LVAD implantation. Center experience is an important determinant of optimal patient outcomes.

摘要

引言

文献中关于每年医院手术量对左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后死亡率和住院时间(LOS)等结局的影响的数据较少。

方法

我们使用国际疾病分类第九版手术编码37.66查询了2008年至2011年的全国住院患者样本。我们纳入了年龄≥18岁且未将原位心脏移植作为主要诊断的患者。计算了每家医院每年的LVAD植入量。使用多变量分层混合效应逻辑回归模型来确定住院死亡率和住院时间的预测因素。

结果

2008年至2011年共进行了1749例LVAD植入手术;患者的平均年龄为55.4岁,23%为女性。住院死亡率从医院手术量第一三分位数(每年1 - 22例LVAD植入)的20.9%降至第三三分位数(每年≥35例LVAD植入)的13.7%。住院时间中位数从医院手术量第一三分位数的34天降至第三三分位数的28天。医院手术量最高三分位数预测住院死亡率和住院时间的调整优势比分别为0.41(0.26 - 0.64,P <.001)和0.41(0.23 - 0.73,P =.003)。受限立方样条分析表明,每年LVAD植入量>20例的阈值与<10%的良好死亡率相关。

结论

每年较高的LVAD植入量与LVAD植入术后住院死亡率和住院时间显著降低相关。中心经验是患者获得最佳结局的重要决定因素。

相似文献

1
Impact of Annual Hospital Volume on Outcomes after Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Implantation in the Contemporary Era.当代年度医院手术量对左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后结局的影响。
J Card Fail. 2016 Mar;22(3):232-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
2
The Impact of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on In-Hospital Mortality of Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.医院和外科医生手术量对心室辅助装置接受者住院死亡率的影响
J Card Fail. 2016 Mar;22(3):226-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
National Trends in Utilization, Mortality, Complications, and Cost of Care After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation From 2005 to 2011.2005年至2011年左心室辅助装置植入术后护理的使用、死亡率、并发症及费用的全国趋势
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1477-84. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
4
The Use of Pediatric Ventricular Assist Devices in Children's Hospitals From 2000 to 2010: Morbidity, Mortality, and Hospital Charges.2000年至2010年儿童医院小儿心室辅助装置的使用情况:发病率、死亡率及医院费用
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul;16(6):522-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000401.
5
Sex-Based Differences in Left Ventricular Assist Device Utilization: Insights From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2004 to 2016.基于性别的左心室辅助装置使用差异:来自 2004 年至 2016 年全国住院患者样本的见解。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Sep;12(9):e006082. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006082. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
6
Trends in Utilization, Mortality, Major Complications, and Cost After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in the United States (2009 to 2014).美国左心室辅助装置植入术后的使用趋势、死亡率、主要并发症及成本(2009年至2014年)
Am J Cardiol. 2018 May 15;121(10):1214-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.01.041. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
7
Heart transplant and left ventricular assist device costs.心脏移植和左心室辅助装置的费用。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Feb;24(2):200-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.11.397.
8
Left Ventricular Assist Devices Impact Hospital Resource Utilization Without Affecting Patient Mortality in Gastrointestinal Bleeding.左心室辅助装置对胃肠道出血患者的医院资源利用有影响,但不影响患者死亡率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jan;62(1):150-160. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4379-8. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
9
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
10
Comparison of Trends, Mortality, and Readmissions After Insertion of Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Patients <65 Years Vs ≥65 Years.比较<65 岁和≥65 岁患者左心室辅助装置植入后的趋势、死亡率和再入院率。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Aug 1;128:16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.04.033. Epub 2020 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks.心源性休克:方案、团队、中心及网络
US Cardiol. 2021 Oct 20;15:e18. doi: 10.15420/usc.2021.10. eCollection 2021.
2
Sex-Associated Differences in the Clinical Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: Insights From Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.性别对左心室辅助装置接受者临床结局的影响:来自机械循环辅助支持机构注册研究的结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;16(6):e010189. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010189. Epub 2023 May 26.
3
Learning Curve in Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Low Volumes Do Not Equate Bad Outcomes.
左心室辅助装置植入中的学习曲线:低容量并不等同于不良结局。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Oct 8;37(5):628-638. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0498.
4
In a large-volume multidisciplinary setting individual surgeon volume does not impact LVAD outcomes.在大容量多学科环境中,个体外科医生的手术量不会影响 LVAD 结果。
J Card Surg. 2022 Oct;37(10):3290-3299. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16783. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
5
Advancing Quality Metrics for Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant: Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database.推进耐用型左心室辅助装置植入的质量指标:对胸外科医生协会 INTERMACS 数据库的分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 May;113(5):1544-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.01.031. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Failure to rescue: A candidate quality metric for durable left ventricular assist device implantation.未能成功挽救:一种用于持久性左心室辅助装置植入的潜在质量指标。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jun;165(6):2114-2123.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.10.054. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
7
Optimal surgeon and hospital volume thresholds to reduce mortality and length of stay for CABG.优化外科医生和医院手术量阈值,以降低 CABG 的死亡率和住院时间。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249750. eCollection 2021.
8
Left Ventricular Assist Device as Destination Therapy: a State of the Science and Art of Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support.作为终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置:长期机械循环支持的科学与技术现状
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2019 Oct;16(5):168-179. doi: 10.1007/s11897-019-00438-x.
9
In-hospital mortality in older patients after ventricular assist device implantation: A national cohort study.老年患者心室辅助装置植入术后院内死亡率:一项全国队列研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug;158(2):466-475.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.142. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
National Landscape of Unplanned 30-Day Readmissions in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入患者计划外30天再入院的全国情况
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 15;122(2):261-267. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.363. Epub 2018 Apr 11.