Suppr超能文献

血管内血运重建与间歇性跛行的监督锻炼:一项随机临床试验。

Endovascular Revascularization and Supervised Exercise for Peripheral Artery Disease and Intermittent Claudication: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands2Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Research and Innovation, Dutch Health Care Inspectorate, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA. 2015 Nov 10;314(18):1936-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.14851.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Supervised exercise is recommended as a first-line treatment for intermittent claudication. Combination therapy of endovascular revascularization plus supervised exercise may be more promising but few data comparing the 2 therapies are available.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of endovascular revascularization plus supervised exercise for intermittent claudication compared with supervised exercise only.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial of 212 patients allocated to either endovascular revascularization plus supervised exercise or supervised exercise only. Data were collected between May 17, 2010, and February 16, 2013, in the Netherlands at 10 sites. Patients were followed up for 12 months and the data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

INTERVENTIONS

A combination of endovascular revascularization (selective stenting) plus supervised exercise (n = 106) or supervised exercise only (n = 106).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was the difference in maximum treadmill walking distance at 12 months between the groups. Secondary end points included treadmill pain-free walking distance, vascular quality of life (VascuQol) score (1 [worst outcome] to 7 [best outcome]), and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) domain scores for physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, and general health perceptions (0 [severe limitation] to 100 [no limitation]).

RESULTS

Endovascular revascularization plus supervised exercise (combination therapy) was associated with significantly greater improvement in maximum walking distance (from 264 m to 1501 m for an improvement of 1237 m) compared with the supervised exercise only group (from 285 m to 1240 m for improvement of 955 m) (mean difference between groups, 282 m; 99% CI, 60-505 m) and in pain-free walking distance (from 117 m to 1237 m for an improvement of 1120 m vs from 135 m to 847 m for improvement of 712 m, respectively) (mean difference, 408 m; 99% CI, 195-622 m). Similarly, the combination therapy group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in the disease-specific VascuQol score (1.34 [99% CI, 1.04-1.64] in the combination therapy group vs 0.73 [99% CI, 0.43-1.03] in the exercise group; mean difference, 0.62 [99% CI, 0.20-1.03]) and in the score for the SF-36 physical functioning (22.4 [99% CI, 16.3-28.5] vs 12.6 [99% CI, 6.3-18.9], respectively; mean difference, 9.8 [99% CI, 1.4-18.2]). No significant differences were found for the SF-36 domains of physical role functioning, bodily pain, and general health perceptions.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with intermittent claudication after 1 year of follow-up, a combination therapy of endovascular revascularization followed by supervised exercise resulted in significantly greater improvement in walking distances and health-related quality-of-life scores compared with supervised exercise only.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Registry Identifier: NTR2249.

摘要

重要性

有监督的运动被推荐为间歇性跛行的一线治疗方法。血管内再通术联合有监督的运动的联合治疗可能更有前途,但比较这两种治疗方法的资料很少。

目的

评估血管内再通术联合有监督的运动治疗间歇性跛行与单纯有监督的运动相比的有效性。

设计、地点和参与者:在荷兰的 10 个地点进行的一项 212 例患者随机临床试验,将患者分为血管内再通术联合有监督的运动组(n = 106)或单纯有监督的运动组(n = 106)。数据收集于 2010 年 5 月 17 日至 2013 年 2 月 16 日。对患者进行了 12 个月的随访,并根据意向治疗原则进行了数据分析。

干预措施

血管内再通术(选择性支架置入术)联合有监督的运动(n = 106)或单纯有监督的运动(n = 106)。

主要终点

两组患者在 12 个月时最大跑步机行走距离的差异。次要终点包括跑步机无疼痛行走距离、血管健康生活质量评分(1 [最差结局]至 7 [最佳结局])和 36 项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)身体功能、身体角色功能、身体疼痛和一般健康感知领域评分(0 [严重受限]至 100 [无受限])。

结果

与单纯有监督的运动组(从 285 米到 1240 米,改善 955 米)相比,血管内再通术联合有监督的运动(联合治疗)组在最大行走距离(从 264 米改善到 1501 米,改善 1237 米)和无疼痛行走距离(从 117 米改善到 1501 米,改善 1237 米)方面有显著的改善(两组之间的平均差异,282 米;99%置信区间,60-505 米)和无疼痛行走距离(从 135 米改善到 847 米,改善 712 米)。同样,联合治疗组在疾病特异性血管健康生活质量评分(联合治疗组为 1.34 [99%置信区间,1.04-1.64],运动组为 0.73 [99%置信区间,0.43-1.03];平均差异,0.62 [99%置信区间,0.20-1.03])和 SF-36 身体功能评分(22.4 [99%置信区间,16.3-28.5] vs 12.6 [99%置信区间,6.3-18.9];平均差异,9.8 [99%置信区间,1.4-18.2])方面也有显著改善。在 SF-36 身体角色功能、身体疼痛和一般健康感知领域没有发现显著差异。

结论和相关性

在随访 1 年后,间歇性跛行患者中,血管内再通术联合有监督的运动治疗后再进行有监督的运动治疗,与单纯有监督的运动治疗相比,行走距离和健康相关生活质量评分的改善更为显著。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册处标识符:NTR2249。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验