Schmitter M, Lotze G, Bömicke W, Rues S
Department of Prosthodontics, Section of Material Sciences, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Prosthodontics, Section of Material Sciences, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Dent Mater. 2015 Dec;31(12):1552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of surface treatment on the fracture resistance of zirconia-based all-ceramic anterior crowns.
Sixty-four zirconia-based all-ceramic anterior crowns, veneered by use of a press-on technique, were produced. For 48 crowns intraoral adjustment was simulated (A-group), 16 crowns remained unadjusted (WA-group). The adjusted area was then treated in three ways: 1. no further surface treatment; 2. polishing, with irrigation, using polishers interspersed with diamond grit for ceramics; and 3. polishing and glaze firing. Half of the specimens were loaded until fracture in an universal testing device without artificial ageing; the other crowns underwent thermocycling and chewing simulation before ultimate-load testing. Explorative statistical analysis was performed by use of non-parametric and parametric tests. In addition, fracture-strength tests according to ISO 6872 were performed for veneer ceramic subjected to the different surface treatments. Finite element analysis was also conducted for the crowns, and surface roughness was measured.
Crowns in the A-group were more sensitive to aging than crowns in the WA-group (p=0.038). Although both polishing and glaze firing slightly improved the fracture resistance of the specimens, the fracture resistance in the WA-group (initial fracture resistance (IFR): 652.0 ± 107.7N, remaining fracture resistance after aging (RFR): 560.6 ± 233.3N) was higher than the fracture resistance in the A-group (polished: IFR: 477.9 ± 108.8N, RFR: 386.0 ± 218.5N; glaze firing: IFR: 535.5 ± 128.0N, RFR: 388.6 ± 202.2N). Surface roughness without adjustment was Ra=0.1 μm; for adjustment but without further treatment it was Ra=1.4 μm; for adjustment and polishing it was Ra=0.3 μm; and for adjustment, polishing, and glazing it was Ra=0.6 μm. Stress distributions obtained by finite element analysis in combination with fracture strength tests showed that fractures most probably originated from the occlusal surface.
To improve fracture resistance and reduce the incidence of failure, extensive occlusal adjustment of veneered anterior zirconia restorations should be avoided. Neither polishing nor glazing could restore the fracture resistance to the level maintained with unadjusted crowns.
本研究旨在评估表面处理对氧化锆基全瓷前牙冠抗折性能的影响。
制作了64个采用压制技术贴面的氧化锆基全瓷前牙冠。对其中48个冠模拟口内调改(A组),16个冠未进行调改(WA组)。然后对调改区域进行三种处理:1. 不进行进一步表面处理;2. 使用穿插有陶瓷用金刚石磨粒的抛光器进行带冲洗的抛光;3. 抛光并进行釉烧。一半标本在通用测试装置中加载直至断裂,未进行人工老化;另一半冠在极限载荷测试前进行热循环和咀嚼模拟。使用非参数和参数检验进行探索性统计分析。此外,对经过不同表面处理的贴面陶瓷按照ISO 6872进行抗折强度测试。还对牙冠进行了有限元分析,并测量了表面粗糙度。
A组牙冠比WA组牙冠对老化更敏感(p = 0.038)。尽管抛光和釉烧都略微提高了标本的抗折性能,但WA组的抗折性能(初始抗折强度(IFR):652.0 ± 107.7N,老化后剩余抗折强度(RFR):560.6 ± 233.3N)高于A组(抛光:IFR:477.9 ± 108.8N,RFR:386.0 ± 218.5N;釉烧:IFR:535.5 ± 128.0N,RFR:388.6 ± 202.2N)。未调改时表面粗糙度为Ra = 0.1μm;调改但未进一步处理时为Ra = 1.4μm;调改并抛光时为Ra = 0.3μm;调改、抛光并上釉时为Ra = 0.6μm。通过有限元分析结合抗折强度测试获得的应力分布表明,骨折最可能起源于咬合面。
为提高抗折性能并降低失败发生率,应避免对贴面氧化锆前牙修复体进行广泛的咬合调改。抛光和釉烧均无法将抗折性能恢复到未调改牙冠所保持的水平。