Merk Susanne, Wagner Christina, Stock Veronika, Schmidlin Patrick R, Roos Malgorzata, Eichberger Marlis, Stawarczyk Bogna
Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Goethestrasse 70, Munich 80336, Germany.
Clinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, Zurich 8032, Switzerland.
Materials (Basel). 2016 May 11;9(5):354. doi: 10.3390/ma9050354.
This study aimed to examine and compare the retention load values (RL) of different telescopic crown assemblies (Y-TZP and CoCr primary crowns with electroformed and Y-TZP secondary crowns each) with three different taper angles (0°, 1° and 2°). Thirty Y-TZP primary crowns with electroformed gold copings (Z/G group) and Y-TZP secondary crowns (Z/Z group) and 30 CoCr primary crowns with electroformed gold copings (C/G group) and Y-TZP secondary crowns (C/Z group), each with taper angles of 0°, 1° and 2°, were fabricated, respectively. With the exception of the electroformed gold copings, all specimens were Computer-Aided-Design/Computer-Aided-Manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-milled, then sintered and afterwards manually adapted. In order to stabilize the gold copings, they were fixed in a tertiary structure. The secondary crowns were constructed with a hook, which ensured self-alignment with an upper chain. Afterwards, 20 pull-off test cycles were performed in a universal testing machine under artificial saliva and after weighing the secondary crowns with a 5 kg object for 20 s. Data were analyzed by one-way and two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). C/Z with 1° showed higher ( = 0.009) RL than 0° and 2° tapers. C/G at 1° also showed higher ( = 0.001) RL than at tapers of 0° and 2°. Z/G and C/G at 0° showed lower RL than Z/Z and C/Z ( < 0.001). Primary crowns had no impact on the 0° group. Z/G showed lower RL as compared to C/Z within the 1° group ( = 0.007) and Z/Z in the 2° group ( = 0.006). The primary crown material had no influence on RL. Electroformed copings showed lower RL. Further investigations for 1° as well as for the long-term performance after thermomechanical aging are necessary.
本研究旨在检测和比较不同套筒冠组件(分别为带有电铸金冠的Y-TZP和CoCr基牙冠以及Y-TZP继牙冠)在三种不同锥度角(0°、1°和2°)下的固位负荷值(RL)。分别制作了30个带有电铸金冠的Y-TZP基牙冠(Z/G组)和Y-TZP继牙冠(Z/Z组),以及30个带有电铸金冠的CoCr基牙冠(C/G组)和Y-TZP继牙冠(C/Z组),每组的锥度角分别为0°、1°和2°。除电铸金冠外,所有标本均采用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)铣削,然后烧结,之后进行手工适配。为了固定金冠,将其固定在三级结构中。继牙冠采用挂钩结构,确保与上链自动对齐。之后,在万能试验机中于人工唾液环境下进行20次拉脱试验循环,并在将5 kg物体放置在继牙冠上20 s后称重。数据采用单向和双向方差分析(ANOVA)进行分析。锥度为1°的C/Z组的RL高于0°和2°锥度组(P = 0.009)。锥度为1°的C/G组的RL也高于0°和2°锥度组(P = 0.001)。锥度为0°的Z/G组和C/G组的RL低于Z/Z组和C/Z组(P < 0.001)。基牙冠材料对0°组的RL无影响。Z/G组在1°组内的RL低于C/Z组(P = 0.007),在2°组内低于Z/Z组(P = 0.006)。基牙冠材料对RL无影响。电铸金冠显示出较低的RL。有必要对1°锥度以及热机械老化后的长期性能进行进一步研究。