Gobe Glenda C, Coombes Jeff S, Fassett Robert G, Endre Zoltan H
a 1 The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, School of Medicine, Centre for Kidney Disease Research , Woolloongabba 4102, Australia +61 7 34 43 80 11 ; +61 7 34 43 77 79 ;
b 2 The University of Queensland, School of Human Movement Studies, Exercise and Oxidative Stress Group , St Lucia, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015;11(11):1683-94. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2015.1083011. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
This article addresses general biomarkers of drug-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and their application in development and progression of AKI in the adult. It also highlights some clinical benefits, but also uncertainties, of biomarker use.
Drug-induced AKI is traditionally diagnosed by monitoring serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen and albuminuria. The sensitivity of these measures is, however, limited to well-established AKI. Application of selected biomarkers for early diagnosis of drug-induced AKI may inform on progression of AKI and alert clinicians to adopt renoprotective strategies at the earliest times. Novel biomarkers, accepted for early detection of drug-induced AKI (kidney injury molecule-1, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase), may be useful additions in panels of biomarkers. Clinical biomarkers of cell cycle arrest, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 show promise but need further validation in clinical trials.
Traditional parameters, such as SCr, provide some guidance for functional decline in drug-induced AKI but early, more sensitive, affordable, clinically acceptable, biomarkers of kidney dysfunction are needed. Basic biological understanding of AKI will improve with high-throughput methodologies such as proteomics and metabolomics, and this should lead to identification and usage of novel biomarkers. Ultimately, a combination of biomarkers indicating kidney dysfunction and damage is likely to be required.
本文探讨药物性急性肾损伤(AKI)的一般生物标志物及其在成人AKI发生和发展中的应用。文章还强调了生物标志物应用的一些临床益处,但也指出了其不确定性。
传统上,药物性AKI通过监测血清肌酐(SCr)、血尿素氮和蛋白尿来诊断。然而,这些指标的敏感性仅限于已确诊的AKI。应用特定生物标志物早期诊断药物性AKI,可能有助于了解AKI的进展情况,并提醒临床医生尽早采取肾脏保护策略。用于早期检测药物性AKI的新型生物标志物(肾损伤分子-1、中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白和N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶),可能是生物标志物组合中的有用补充。细胞周期停滞、金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂-2和胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白7的临床生物标志物显示出前景,但需要在临床试验中进一步验证。
传统参数如SCr,为药物性AKI的功能衰退提供了一些指导,但需要早期、更敏感、经济实惠且临床可接受的肾功能障碍生物标志物。借助蛋白质组学和代谢组学等高通量方法,对AKI的基本生物学认识将得到提高,这应该会带来新型生物标志物的识别和应用。最终,可能需要一组指示肾功能障碍和损伤的生物标志物组合。