Suppr超能文献

严重创伤后院内死亡率的预测:哪种院前评分最准确?

Prediction of intra-hospital mortality after severe trauma: which pre-hospital score is the most accurate?

作者信息

Bouzat Pierre, Legrand Robin, Gillois Pierre, Ageron François-Xavier, Brun Julien, Savary Dominique, Champly Frédéric, Albaladejo Pierre, Payen Jean-François

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Albert Michallon, BP 217, F-38043, Grenoble, France; Univ Grenoble Alpes, F-38043, Grenoble, France; INSERM U836, F-38043, Grenoble, France.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Albert Michallon, BP 217, F-38043, Grenoble, France.

出版信息

Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.035. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Computing trauma scores in the field allows immediate severity assessment for appropriate triage. Two pre-hospital scores can be useful in this context: the Triage-Revised Trauma Score (T-RTS) and the Mechanism, Glasgow, Age and arterial Pressure (MGAP) score. The Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score (TRISS), not applicable in the pre-hospital setting, is the reference score to predict in-hospital mortality after severe trauma. The aim of this study was to compare T-RTS, MGAP and TRISS in a cohort of consecutive patients admitted in the Trauma system of the Northern French Alps(TRENAU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2009 to 2011, 3260 patients with suspected severe trauma according to the Vittel criteria were included in the TRENAU registry. All data necessary to compute T-RTS, MGAP and TRISS were collected in patients admitted to one level-I, two level-II and ten level-III trauma centers. The primary endpoint was death from any cause during hospital stay. Discriminative power of each score to predict mortality was measured using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. To test the relevancy of each score for triage, we also tested their sensitivity at usual cut-offs. We expected a sensitivity higher than 95% to limit undertriage.

RESULTS

The TRISS score showed the highest area under the ROC curve (0.95 [CI 95% 0.94-0.97], p<0.01). Pre-hospital MGAP score had significantly higher AUC compared to T-RTS (0.93 [CI 95% 0.91-0.95] vs 0.86 [CI 95% 0.83-0.89], respectively, p<0.01). MGAP score<23 had a sensitivity of 88% to detect mortality. Sensitivities of T-RTS<12 and TRISS<0.91 were 79% and 87%, respectively.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Pre-hospital calculation of the MGAP score appeared superior to T-RTS score in predicting intra-hospital mortality in a cohort of trauma patients. Although TRISS had the highest AUC, this score can only be available after hospital admission. These findings suggest that the MGAP score could be of interest in the pre-hospital setting to assess patients' severity. However, its lack of sensitivity indicates that MGAP should not replace the decision scheme to direct the most severe patients to level-I trauma center.

摘要

目的

在现场计算创伤评分可对伤情进行即时严重程度评估,以进行恰当分诊。在此背景下,两种院前评分可能有用:分诊修订创伤评分(T-RTS)和机制、格拉斯哥评分、年龄与动脉压(MGAP)评分。创伤修订损伤严重度评分(TRISS)不适用于院前环境,是预测严重创伤患者院内死亡率的参考评分。本研究的目的是在法国北部阿尔卑斯山创伤系统(TRENAU)收治的连续患者队列中比较T-RTS、MGAP和TRISS。

材料与方法

2009年至2011年,TRENAU登记处纳入了3260例符合维特尔标准的疑似严重创伤患者。在一家一级、两家二级和十家三级创伤中心收治的患者中收集了计算T-RTS、MGAP和TRISS所需的所有数据。主要终点是住院期间任何原因导致的死亡。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析来测量每个评分预测死亡率的鉴别能力。为了测试每个评分用于分诊的相关性,我们还在常用切点处测试了它们的敏感性。我们期望敏感性高于95%以限制分诊不足。

结果

TRISS评分在ROC曲线下面积最大(0.95[95%置信区间0.94 - 0.97],p<0.01)。院前MGAP评分的AUC显著高于T-RTS(分别为0.93[95%置信区间0.91 - 0.95]和0.86[95%置信区间0.83 - 0.89],p<0.01)。MGAP评分<23检测死亡率的敏感性为88%。T-RTS<12和TRISS<0.91的敏感性分别为79%和87%。

讨论/结论:在一组创伤患者中,院前计算MGAP评分在预测院内死亡率方面似乎优于T-RTS评分。虽然TRISS的AUC最高,但该评分只能在入院后获得。这些发现表明,MGAP评分在院前环境中评估患者严重程度可能有意义。然而,其敏感性不足表明MGAP不应取代将最严重患者转诊至一级创伤中心的决策方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验