Suppr超能文献

工程纳米颗粒在固体介质中的效应评估——当前见解与未来方向

Effect assessment of engineered nanoparticles in solid media - Current insight and the way forward.

作者信息

Amorim Mónica J B, Roca Carlos P, Scott-Fordsmand Janeck J

机构信息

University of Aveiro, Department of Biology & CESAM, Aveiro, Portugal.

Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2016 Nov;218:1370-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.048. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

Abstract

Engineered Nanoparticles (ENPs) present novel/added challenges to the established effect assessment modus operandi, requiring an update of used methods. ENPs are dimensionally and physically different from conventional chemicals, which imply that the metrics with which we relate effect and the type of effect responses are different from that of the conventional approach. Effects on organisms are often preceded by changes on the sub-organismal level (cell, genes), dedicated tools have vast potential to detect earlier (and link to) effects on higher levels of organization. High-throughput screening (HTS) is rapid, cost-effective and specific. One way forward is to link HTS to population outcomes, targeting a systems toxicology approach. Although the benefits of integrating various levels of information may seem obvious, this is an even more decisive aspect when rapid answers are needed for ENPs. Here we rank the available tools/methods, highlight main study gaps and list priority needs and the way forward.

摘要

工程纳米颗粒(ENPs)给既定的效应评估操作方法带来了新的/额外的挑战,需要更新所使用的方法。ENPs在尺寸和物理性质上与传统化学品不同,这意味着我们关联效应的指标以及效应响应的类型与传统方法不同。对生物体的影响通常先于亚生物体水平(细胞、基因)的变化,专用工具在检测更高组织水平上的早期影响(并与之建立联系)方面具有巨大潜力。高通量筛选(HTS)快速、经济高效且具有特异性。一种前进的方法是将HTS与种群结果联系起来,采用系统毒理学方法。尽管整合不同层次信息的好处似乎显而易见,但在需要对ENPs快速给出答案时,这是一个更具决定性的方面。在此,我们对可用工具/方法进行排名,突出主要研究差距,并列出优先需求和前进方向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验