Pabalan Noel, Singian Eloisa, Tabangay Lani, Jarjanazi Hamdi, Singh Neetu
Center for Research and Development, Angeles University Foundation, Angeles City, Philippines.
College of Allied Medical Professions, Angeles University Foundation, Angeles City, Philippines.
Biomark Cancer. 2015 Oct 29;7(Suppl 1):21-8. doi: 10.4137/BIC.S25251. eCollection 2015.
Inconsistency in the reported associations between the A66G polymorphism in the methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) gene and colorectal cancer (CRC) prompted a meta-analysis, so that we could obtain a more precise estimate. Databases searches of the published literature yielded 20 case-control studies from 17 articles (8,371 cases and 12,574 controls). We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals in three genetic comparisons (A allele, G allele, and A/G genotype). We found no evidence of overall associations between MTRR A66G and CRC risk (OR 0.96-1.05, P = 0.12-0.44). This was materially unchanged when reanalyzed without the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE)-deviating studies (OR 0.97-1.06, P = 0.11-0.65). In the A allele comparison, however, outlier treatment generated significant protection (OR 0.91, P = 0.01). Combined removal of the outliers and HWE-deviating studies reflected this summary effect (OR 0.90, P = 0.01) as did the pooled OR from high-quality studies (OR 0.90, P = 0.01). Only the Asian subgroup showed significant (both at P = 0.05) A allele (OR 1.13) and A/G genotype (OR 0.88) associations. In conclusion, post-outlier A allele effects were protective. Our study also suggests ethnic-specific associations with Asian susceptibility and protection in the A allele and A/G genotype comparisons, respectively. Folate status showed no association of this polymorphism with CRC.
甲硫氨酸合成酶还原酶(MTRR)基因A66G多态性与结直肠癌(CRC)之间报道的关联存在不一致性,因此进行了一项荟萃分析,以便我们能够获得更精确的估计。对已发表文献的数据库检索产生了来自17篇文章的20项病例对照研究(8371例病例和12574例对照)。我们在三种基因比较(A等位基因、G等位基因和A/G基因型)中计算了合并比值比(OR)和95%置信区间。我们没有发现MTRR A66G与CRC风险之间存在总体关联的证据(OR 0.96 - 1.05,P = 0.12 - 0.44)。在不纳入偏离哈迪-温伯格平衡(HWE)的研究重新分析时,这一结果基本未变(OR 0.97 - 1.06,P = 0.11 - 0.65)。然而,在A等位基因比较中,去除异常值后产生了显著的保护作用(OR 0.91,P = 0.01)。同时去除异常值和偏离HWE的研究反映了这一汇总效应(OR 0.90,P = 0.01),高质量研究的合并OR也是如此(OR 0.90,P = 0.01)。只有亚洲亚组显示出A等位基因(OR 1.13)和A/G基因型(OR 0.88)的显著关联(P均 = 0.05)。总之,去除异常值后A等位基因的效应具有保护作用。我们的研究还表明,在A等位基因和A/G基因型比较中,分别存在与亚洲人易感性和保护相关的种族特异性关联。叶酸状态显示该多态性与CRC无关联。