Gutnik Lily, Dieleman Joseph, Dare Anna J, Ramos Margarita S, Riviello Robert, Meara John G, Yamey Gavin, Shrime Mark G
Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA UNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 9;5(11):e008780. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008780.
The funds available for global surgical delivery, capacity building and research are unknown and presumed to be low. Meanwhile, conditions amenable to surgery are estimated to account for nearly 30% of the global burden of disease. We describe funds given to these efforts from the USA, the world's largest donor nation.
Retrospective database review. US Agency for International Development (USAID), National Institute of Health (NIH), Foundation Center and registered US charitable organisations were searched for financial data on any organisation giving exclusively to surgical care in low and middle income countries (LMICs). For USAID, NIH and Foundation Center all available data for all years were included. The five recent years of financial data per charitable organisation were included. All nominal dollars were adjusted for inflation by converting to 2014 US dollars.
USA.
USAID, NIH, Foundation Center, Charitable Organisations.
Cumulative funds appropriated to global surgery.
22 NIH funded projects (totalling $31.3 million) were identified, primarily related to injury and trauma. Six relevant USAID projects were identified-all obstetric fistula care totalling $438 million. A total of $105 million was given to universities and charitable organisations by US foundations for 12 different surgical specialties. 95 US charitable organisations representing 14 specialties totalled revenue of $2.67 billion and expenditure of $2.5 billion.
Current funding flows to surgical care in LMICs are poorly understood. US funding predominantly comes from private charitable organisations, is often narrowly focused and does not always reflect local needs or support capacity building. Improving surgical care, and embedding it within national health systems in LMICs, will likely require greater financial investment. Tracking funds targeting surgery helps to quantify and clarify current investments and funding gaps, ensures resources materialise from promises and promotes transparency within global health financing.
全球范围内用于外科手术服务、能力建设及研究的可用资金情况不明,且推测数额较低。与此同时,适合手术治疗的疾病状况估计占全球疾病负担的近30%。我们描述了世界最大捐赠国美国对这些工作的资金投入情况。
回顾性数据库审查。检索了美国国际开发署(USAID)、国立卫生研究院(NIH)、基金会中心以及美国注册慈善组织,以获取向低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)专门提供外科护理的任何组织的财务数据。对于美国国际开发署、国立卫生研究院和基金会中心,纳入了所有年份的所有可用数据。纳入了每个慈善组织最近五年的财务数据。所有名义美元均通过换算成2014年美元进行了通胀调整。
美国。
美国国际开发署、国立卫生研究院、基金会中心、慈善组织。
拨给全球外科手术的累计资金。
确定了22个由国立卫生研究院资助的项目(总计3130万美元),主要与损伤和创伤有关。确定了6个相关的美国国际开发署项目——均为产科瘘管病护理项目,总计4.38亿美元。美国基金会向大学和慈善组织提供了总计1.05亿美元,用于12个不同的外科专业。代表14个专业的95个美国慈善组织的总收入为26.7亿美元,支出为25亿美元。
目前流向低收入和中等收入国家外科护理的资金流动情况了解不足。美国的资金主要来自私人慈善组织,往往重点狭窄,并不总是反映当地需求或支持能力建设。改善低收入和中等收入国家的外科护理并将其纳入国家卫生系统,可能需要更多的财政投资。追踪针对外科手术的资金有助于量化和明确当前的投资及资金缺口,确保承诺的资源得以落实,并促进全球卫生融资的透明度。