Cleland Verity, Hughes Clarissa, Thornton Lukar, Venn Alison, Squibb Kathryn, Ball Kylie
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Centre for Rural Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0140659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140659. eCollection 2015.
Despite increasing evidence that the physical environment impacts on physical activity among urban-dwellers, little attention has been devoted to understanding this relationship in rural populations. Work in this area is further hindered by a lack of environmental measures specifically designed for rural settings. This qualitative study aimed to explore the salience of urban physical activity environment constructs among rural adults.
In 2011, 49 rural men and women from three distinct areas (coastal, animal-based farming, forestry/plant-based farming) of rural Tasmania, Australia, were purposively recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interviews explored features of the built and social environment commonly examined in studies of urban adults, including functional characteristics (eg, lighting, footpaths, roads/verges), road and personal safety, availability and accessibility of places to be active, destinations, and aesthetics. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a content-thematic approach using QSR NVivo software.
While some urban environmental constructs were salient to these rural adults, such as availability of and accessibility to places to be active, some constructs were operationalised differently, such as road safety (where large trucks and winding roads rather than traffic density was of concern), or were not considered relevant (eg, personal safety related to crime, availability of walkable destinations, aesthetics).
The measurement of the physical environment in rural populations may require reconsideration and/or modification to ensure salience and appropriate quantification of associations with physical activity in future studies.
尽管越来越多的证据表明物理环境会影响城市居民的身体活动,但对于农村人口中这种关系的理解却很少受到关注。该领域的研究还因缺乏专门针对农村环境设计的环境测量方法而受到进一步阻碍。这项定性研究旨在探讨城市身体活动环境构成要素在农村成年人中的显著性。
2011年,从澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚农村的三个不同地区(沿海、畜牧养殖、林业/种植养殖)有目的地招募了49名农村男女参与半结构化访谈。访谈探讨了城市成年人研究中通常考察的建筑和社会环境特征,包括功能特征(如照明、人行道、道路/路缘)、道路和人身安全、进行活动场所的可及性和可用性、目的地以及美观性。访谈进行了录音,逐字转录,并使用QSR NVivo软件采用内容主题分析法进行分析。
虽然一些城市环境构成要素对这些农村成年人来说很显著,比如进行活动场所的可及性和可用性,但一些要素的实际情况有所不同,比如道路安全(这里关注的是大型卡车和蜿蜒的道路而非交通密度),或者被认为不相关(如与犯罪相关的人身安全、可步行目的地的可用性、美观性)。
在未来研究中,对农村人口物理环境的测量可能需要重新考虑和/或修改,以确保与身体活动的关联具有显著性并得到适当量化。