Suppr超能文献

惠灵顿哈特谷医院使用CT肺动脉造影对疑似肺栓塞的调查:当前实践与改进机会

Investigation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism at Hutt Valley Hospital with CT Pulmonary Angiography: Current Practice and Opportunities for Improvement.

作者信息

Kennedy Nick, Jayathissa Sisira, Healy Paul

机构信息

Hutt Valley District Health Board, Lower Hutt, Wellington 5040, New Zealand.

出版信息

Adv Med. 2015;2015:357576. doi: 10.1155/2015/357576. Epub 2015 Mar 1.

Abstract

Aims. To study the use of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) at Hutt Hospital and investigate the use of pretest probability scoring in the assessment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods. We studied patients with suspected PE that underwent CTPA between January and May 2012 and collected data on demographics, use of pretest probability scoring, and use of D Dimer and compared our practice with the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guideline. Results. 105 patients underwent CTPA and 15% of patients had PE. 13% of patients had a Wells score prior to their scan. Wells score calculated by researchers revealed 54%, 36%, and 8% patients had low, medium, and high risk pretest probabilities and 8%, 20%, and 50% of these patients had positive scans. D Dimer was performed in 58% of patients and no patients with a negative D Dimer had a PE. Conclusion. The CTPA positive rate was similar to other contemporary studies but lower than previous New Zealand studies and some international guidelines. Risk stratification of suspected PE using Wells score and D Dimer was underutilised. A number of scans could have been safely avoided by using accepted guidelines reducing resources use and improving patient safety.

摘要

目的。研究惠灵顿医院CT肺动脉造影(CTPA)的使用情况,并调查在疑似肺栓塞(PE)患者评估中预测试概率评分的使用情况。方法。我们研究了2012年1月至5月期间接受CTPA检查的疑似PE患者,并收集了有关人口统计学、预测试概率评分的使用以及D - 二聚体使用的数据,并将我们的做法与英国胸科学会(BTS)指南进行比较。结果。105例患者接受了CTPA检查,15%的患者患有PE。13%的患者在扫描前进行了Wells评分。研究人员计算的Wells评分显示,54%、36%和8%的患者预测试概率为低、中、高风险,这些患者中分别有8%、20%和50%的扫描结果为阳性。58%的患者进行了D - 二聚体检测,D - 二聚体结果为阴性的患者中没有PE患者。结论。CTPA阳性率与其他当代研究相似,但低于此前新西兰的研究和一些国际指南。使用Wells评分和D - 二聚体对疑似PE进行风险分层的情况未得到充分利用。通过使用公认的指南可以安全地避免一些扫描,从而减少资源使用并提高患者安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/861a/4590957/183ccfba8f70/AMED2015-357576.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验