Raji Hanieh, JavadMoosavi Seyed Ali, Dastoorpoor Maryam, Mohamadipour Zahra, Mousavi Ghanavati Seyedeh Parvin
Air pollution and Respiratory Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Tehran, Iran.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018 Feb 4;32:3. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.3. eCollection 2018.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utilization and diagnostic yields of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA)using the Revised Geneva score and Wells' criteria, in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). One hundred and twelve adult patients underwent CTPA for suspected PE were participated in this study. The outcome was positive or negative CTPA for PE. Revised Geneva and Wells' scores were calculated. The relationship between the results obtained rom these two scores and the available risk factors were compared. Descriptive analysis such as frequency and mean as well as analytical statistics including chi-square were done. The data analysis was performed using SPSS (v. 22). In this study, according to the Wells' criteria calculated for the patients, 33.9% of the patients had low clinical, 56.3% intermediate and 9.8% high clinical probability. Among the 11 high clinical patients, 9(81.8%) were CTPA positive. Based on the revised Geneva score, 65 patients (58%) had low clinical, 36 (32.1%) intermediate and 11(9.8%) high clinical probability. Among the 1 high clinical patients, 8 were CTPA positive. Positive predictive value of the low clinical patients based on Wells' criteria and the revised Geneva score was 18.4% and 30.8%, respectively. Also, positive predictive value for high clinical probability of Wells' criteria and the revised Geneva score was 81.8% and 72.8% respectively. Under/overuse of CTPA in diagnosing PTE is a common problem especially in university hospitals. It is possible to avoid unnecessary CTPA requests using scholarly investigations and more accurate clinical risk assessments.
本研究的目的是评估在疑似肺栓塞(PE)患者中,使用修订的日内瓦评分和韦尔斯标准进行CT肺动脉造影(CTPA)的利用率和诊断率。112例因疑似PE接受CTPA检查的成年患者参与了本研究。结果为CTPA对PE呈阳性或阴性。计算修订的日内瓦评分和韦尔斯评分。比较这两种评分结果与可用风险因素之间的关系。进行了频率和均值等描述性分析以及包括卡方检验在内的分析统计。使用SPSS(v. 22)进行数据分析。在本研究中,根据为患者计算的韦尔斯标准,33.9%的患者临床可能性低,56.3%为中等,9.8%为高。在11例临床可能性高的患者中,9例(81.8%)CTPA呈阳性。根据修订的日内瓦评分,65例患者(58%)临床可能性低,36例(32.1%)为中等,11例(9.8%)为高。在1例临床可能性高的患者中,8例CTPA呈阳性。基于韦尔斯标准和修订的日内瓦评分,临床可能性低的患者的阳性预测值分别为18.4%和30.8%。此外,韦尔斯标准和修订的日内瓦评分临床可能性高的阳性预测值分别为81.8%和72.8%。在诊断PTE时CTPA的使用不足/过度是一个常见问题,尤其是在大学医院。通过学术研究和更准确的临床风险评估,可以避免不必要的CTPA检查申请。