Lingappa Hemalatha Anthanahalli, Govindashetty Abhishek Mandya, Krishnamurthy Anoosha, Puttaveerachary Ashok Kagathur, Manchaiah Sanjay, Shimoga Indira Channagangappa, Mallaradhya Sushma Hulikere, Gowda Sarvesh Ballekoppa Mukunda
Professor and HOD, Department of Pathology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences , B. G. Nagar, Mandya District, Karnataka, India .
Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences , B. G. Nagar, Mandya District, Karnataka, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):EC01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13270.6655. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
Recent alarming trends of a substantial rise in the number of cases of infertility with as many as 30-40% being attributed to male-factor associated causes have created a need for further studies and advancements in semen analysis. Despite the focus on semen analysis over the years, assessment of sperm morphology has not been given due importance although it is a simple, standard and baseline diagnostic modality. It can be used to predict the need and outcome of Artificial Reproductive Techniques such as Invitro Fertilization, Gamete Intra Fallopian Tube Transfer and Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection.
To find the ideal, simple and cost-effective basic stain for assessment of sperm morphology in a rural tertiary care set- up where advanced equipment for assessment of sperm morphometry are inaccessible.
An updated way of determining sperm shape is called the Kruger's strict morphology method. Keeping this as the standard criterion, we studied semen samples of 62 healthy male subjects using four basic staining techniques and the consensus of four independent observers was tabulated.
We found that Haematoxylin and Eosin stain was the best stain for assessment of sperm head morphology. Rapid Papanicolau stain was the most ideal, simple and cost-effective stain for overall assessment of sperm morphology.
Sperm morphology assessment remains the baseline necessity for the diagnosis and management of male factor associated infertility when advanced techniques are unavailable, inaccessible or unaffordable.
近期令人担忧的趋势是,不育症病例数量大幅上升,其中多达30%-40%归因于男性相关因素,这就需要在精液分析方面开展进一步研究并取得进展。尽管多年来一直关注精液分析,但精子形态评估并未得到应有的重视,尽管它是一种简单、标准且基础的诊断方式。它可用于预测体外受精、配子输卵管内移植和卵胞浆内单精子注射等人造生殖技术的需求和结果。
在无法获得先进精子形态测量设备的农村三级医疗保健机构中,找到用于评估精子形态的理想、简单且经济高效的基础染色方法。
一种更新的确定精子形状的方法称为克鲁格严格形态学方法。以该方法作为标准,我们使用四种基础染色技术研究了62名健康男性受试者的精液样本,并将四位独立观察者的共识制成表格。
我们发现苏木精和伊红染色是评估精子头部形态的最佳染色方法。快速巴氏染色是对精子形态进行全面评估的最理想、简单且经济高效的染色方法。
当无法获得、无法使用或负担不起先进技术时,精子形态评估仍然是诊断和处理男性因素相关不育症的基本必要手段。