• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

侧方无游离仰卧位:仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术的一种新改良方法。

Flank free modified supine position: A new modification for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

作者信息

Desoky Esam A E, Allam Mohammed N, Ammar Mostafa K, Abdelwahab Khaled M, Elsaid Diab A, Fawzi Amr M, Alayman Ahmed A, Shahin Ashraf M S, Kamel Hussein M

机构信息

Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

出版信息

Arab J Urol. 2012 Jun;10(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.aju.2011.12.008
PMID:26558017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4442906/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard management for large and/or complex urolithiasis, but the standard patient position for PCNL is undecided. With the patient prone PCNL has several drawbacks, while when supine, as described previously, PCNL has mechanical limitations. We describe a modification that aims to overcome these limitations and provide easy access comparable to that in the prone position.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was carried out at the Urology Department, Zagazig University, Egypt, from October 2008 to March 2011, and included 78 patients (48 men and 30 women). First the patient was placed supine and then in the 'flank-free modified' supine position. The distance between the last rib and the iliac crest in the posterior axillary line was measured in both positions.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 40.8 years, the mean (SD) stone diameter was 3.4 (0.7) cm, the number of right/left stones was 34/44, and mean body mass index was 28.8 kg/m(2). The mean (SD) increase in the distance between the last rib and the iliac crest in the posterior axillary line in the flank free modified supine position vs. the previous supine position was 12 (0.8) mm.

CONCLUSION

The flank-free modified supine position increases the distance between the last rib and the iliac crest, and, together with the absence of a cushion under the flank, provides ample space for puncture, dilatation, multiple tracts and manoeuvrability of the system with the nephroscope.

摘要

目的

经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗大的和/或复杂尿路结石的标准方法,但PCNL的标准患者体位尚未确定。患者俯卧位时PCNL有几个缺点,而如前所述,仰卧位时PCNL有机械限制。我们描述了一种改良方法,旨在克服这些限制,并提供与俯卧位相当的便捷入路。

患者与方法

这项前瞻性研究于2008年10月至2011年3月在埃及扎加齐格大学泌尿外科进行,纳入了78例患者(48例男性和30例女性)。首先将患者置于仰卧位,然后再置于“无侧腹改良”仰卧位。在这两种体位下测量腋后线中最后一根肋骨与髂嵴之间的距离。

结果

患者的平均年龄为40.8岁,平均(标准差)结石直径为3.4(0.7)cm,右侧/左侧结石数量为34/44,平均体重指数为28.8kg/m²。与之前的仰卧位相比,无侧腹改良仰卧位时腋后线中最后一根肋骨与髂嵴之间距离的平均(标准差)增加量为12(0.8)mm。

结论

无侧腹改良仰卧位增加了最后一根肋骨与髂嵴之间的距离,并且由于侧腹下方没有垫子,为穿刺、扩张、多通道操作以及使用肾镜时系统的可操作性提供了充足空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93d/4442906/9da0351c9281/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93d/4442906/276aafc509bc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93d/4442906/958a0dad3e83/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93d/4442906/9da0351c9281/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93d/4442906/276aafc509bc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93d/4442906/958a0dad3e83/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93d/4442906/9da0351c9281/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Flank free modified supine position: A new modification for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.侧方无游离仰卧位:仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术的一种新改良方法。
Arab J Urol. 2012 Jun;10(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
2
Free-flank modified supine vs. prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomised trial.经皮肾镜取石术中游离侧卧位改良仰卧位与俯卧位的前瞻性随机试验
Arab J Urol. 2013 Mar;11(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
3
Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): 'in vogue' but in which position?仰卧位经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL):“流行”但在哪个体位?
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E1018-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11188.x. Epub 2012 May 7.
4
Flank-free Modified Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Pediatric Age Group.小儿年龄组无侧卧位改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术
Urology. 2015 May;85(5):1162-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.01.030. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
5
A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience.经皮肾镜取石术中标准俯卧位与无侧卧位改良仰卧位的前瞻性随机对照研究:单中心初步经验
Urol Ann. 2022 Apr-Jun;14(2):172-176. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_31_20. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
6
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complete supine flank-free position in comparison to prone position: A single-centre experience.完全仰卧位无侧卧位与俯卧位相比行经皮肾镜取石术:单中心经验
Arab J Urol. 2016 Oct 31;15(1):42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.10.001. eCollection 2017 Mar.
7
One-Shot Dilatation Metal Dilator During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Flank-Free Supine Position: A Randomized Controlled Study.单次扩张法在侧卧位无俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术中应用金属扩张器:一项随机对照研究。
J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):727-733. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0378.
8
Prone versus Barts “flank-free” modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a match-pair analysis.俯卧位与巴茨“无侧卧位”改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:配对分析。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Jun 28;51(3):1373-1379. doi: 10.3906/sag-2011-21.
9
The Barts 'flank-free' modified supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.用于经皮肾镜取石术的巴茨“无侧腹”改良仰卧位。
Urol Int. 2012;89(3):365-8. doi: 10.1159/000341430. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
10
Positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Thirty-five years of evolution.经皮肾镜取石术的体位:35年的演变
Arab J Urol. 2012 Sep;10(3):307-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Simplified biplanar (0-90°) versus monoplanar renal puncture technique in flank free modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy regarding outcomes and learning curve: Randomized clinical trial.在无侧腹改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术中,简化双平面(0-90°)与单平面肾穿刺技术的疗效及学习曲线比较:随机临床试验
Arab J Urol. 2024 Jan 29;22(3):152-158. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2309779. eCollection 2024.
2
Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术采用斜仰卧位与俯卧位的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Jun;18(2):244-253. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.126453. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone and prone-flexed positions: anatomic considerations.俯卧位及俯卧屈曲位经皮肾镜取石术:解剖学考量
J Endourol. 2009 Oct;23(10):1607-14. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0294.
2
Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy, is it really effective? A systematic review of literature.
Urol J. 2009 Spring;6(2):73-7.
3
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access in the lateral decubitus flank position.在侧卧位下采用超声引导经皮肾穿刺造瘘进行经皮肾镜取石术。
PCNL in the prone position VS PCNL in the modified supine Double-S position: is there a better position? A prospective randomized trial.
俯卧位经皮肾镜碎石术与改良仰卧位“双“S 位经皮肾镜碎石术:哪种体位更好?一项前瞻性随机试验。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Feb;48(1):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1088-0. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy in Double-S Position.双S体位下仰卧位经皮肾镜碎石术
Adv Urol. 2018 Mar 11;2018:7193843. doi: 10.1155/2018/7193843. eCollection 2018.
5
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complete supine flank-free position in comparison to prone position: A single-centre experience.完全仰卧位无侧卧位与俯卧位相比行经皮肾镜取石术:单中心经验
Arab J Urol. 2016 Oct 31;15(1):42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.10.001. eCollection 2017 Mar.
6
Immediate versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for inaccessible stones after uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy.单纯经皮肾镜取石术后难以触及结石的即时与延迟冲击波碎石术
Arab J Urol. 2016 Dec 28;15(1):30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.11.002. eCollection 2017 Mar.
7
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience.无侧卧位改良仰卧位下微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:单中心经验。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):585-589. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0966-1. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
8
Free-flank modified supine vs. prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomised trial.经皮肾镜取石术中游离侧卧位改良仰卧位与俯卧位的前瞻性随机试验
Arab J Urol. 2013 Mar;11(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
J Endourol. 2009 Jan;23(1):33-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0433.
4
Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique.完全仰卧位经皮肾镜碎石术与俯卧位标准技术的比较。
J Endourol. 2008 Nov;22(11):2513-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0463.
5
Prone or supine: is this the question?俯卧还是仰卧:这就是问题所在吗?
Eur Urol. 2008 Dec;54(6):1216-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.069. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
6
[Comparison between Valdivia position and prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy].经皮肾镜取石术中瓦尔迪维亚体位与俯卧位的比较
Actas Urol Esp. 2008 Apr;32(4):424-9. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(08)73857-9.
7
Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial.经皮肾镜取石术中改良仰卧位与俯卧位用于单次经皮穿刺即可治疗的肾结石:一项前瞻性随机试验
Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.067. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
8
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: a neglected approach?
J Endourol. 2007 Dec;21(12):1433-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0375.
9
Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy with the patient in a modified supine position.患者取改良仰卧位行经皮肾镜碎石术。
J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):165-8; discussion 168. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.056. Epub 2007 May 17.
10
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: technical aspects and functional outcome compared with the prone technique.仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:技术要点及与俯卧位技术相比的功能结局
Urology. 2002 Sep;60(3):388-92. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01738-7.