Suppr超能文献

膝关节支具治疗骨关节炎的有效性:多学科诊所的实用试验

Effectiveness of knee bracing in osteoarthritis: pragmatic trial in a multidisciplinary clinic.

作者信息

Yu Shirley P, Williams Matthew, Eyles Jillian P, Chen Jian Sheng, Makovey Joanna, Hunter David J

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Physiotherapy, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Rheum Dis. 2016 Mar;19(3):279-86. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12796. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

Abstract

AIM

Assessing the effectiveness of bracing treatment for tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) and patellofemoral OA in patients with knee OA.

METHOD

This study was conducted within the Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program (OACCP), a 52-week multidisciplinary non-operative program for OA patients. All participants had symptomatic, radiographic knee OA. Knee bracing with Ossur Unloader One and Tru-pull Lite was offered for participants with medial/lateral tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA, respectively. Participants were assessed at weeks 0, 12, 26 and 52. The primary outcome was knee pain and function at week 52, as assessed by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain and activities of daily living (ADL) scores. Linear regression models were used to compare effectiveness for pain and function between three groups (patellofemoral bracing, tibiofemoral bracing and no bracing).

RESULT

There were 204 participants; 50 assigned patellofemoral bracing, 86 tibiofemoral bracing and 68 with no bracing. Mean baseline KOOS pain score was 52.9, 41.7 and 43.3 (0-100 scale where 100 represents normal) and mean baseline KOOS ADL score was 55.8, 43.7 and 43.1 for the three groups, respectively. Significant improvements were found in each group at week 52 for KOOS pain score and KOOS ADL. There was no significant difference in KOOS pain (P = 0.12) and ADL score (P = 0.13) at week 52 between the three brace types after adjusting for baseline variables.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary non-operative program improved pain and function in persons with patellofemoral and tibiofemoral OA. However, wearing a patellofemoral or a tibiofemoral brace did not appear to provide additional benefits.

摘要

目的

评估支具治疗对膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者胫股关节OA和髌股关节OA的有效性。

方法

本研究在骨关节炎慢性护理项目(OACCP)中进行,该项目是一项针对OA患者的为期52周的多学科非手术项目。所有参与者均有症状性、影像学膝关节OA。分别为患有内侧/外侧胫股关节和髌股关节OA的参与者提供奥索(Ossur)卸载一号(Unloader One)和特鲁拉(Tru-pull)轻量型支具。在第0、12、26和52周对参与者进行评估。主要结局是第52周时的膝关节疼痛和功能,通过膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)疼痛和日常生活活动(ADL)评分进行评估。使用线性回归模型比较三组(髌股关节支具、胫股关节支具和不使用支具)在疼痛和功能方面的有效性。

结果

共有204名参与者;50人分配接受髌股关节支具治疗,8人接受胫股关节支具治疗,68人不使用支具。三组的平均基线KOOS疼痛评分分别为52.9、41.7和43.3(0 - 100分制,100分代表正常),平均基线KOOS ADL评分分别为55.8、43.7和43.1。在第52周时,每组的KOOS疼痛评分和KOOS ADL均有显著改善。在调整基线变量后,三种支具类型在第52周时的KOOS疼痛评分(P = 0.12)和ADL评分(P = 0.13)无显著差异。

结论

一个多学科非手术项目改善了髌股关节和胫股关节OA患者的疼痛和功能。然而,佩戴髌股关节或胫股关节支具似乎并未带来额外益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验