Zhou Xin, Yu Yating, Guo Jinwei, Cao Liezhen, Zhang Xiaohua, Deng Zhongliang
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, PR China.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chongqing University Jiangjin Hospital, Centre Hospital of Jiangjin District, Chongqing, 402260, PR China.
J Orthop. 2025 Apr 3;63:171-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.045. eCollection 2025 May.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various physical therapy methods in reducing pain for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, VIP, WanFang Data, and CNKI, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on physical therapies for KOA. The search spanned from the inception of each database to October 2024. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook. Pain was measured using tools such as the visual analog scale, numeric pain rating scale, and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index. All pain scores were standardized to a 10-point scale. Data collection and analysis were performed independently by two researchers using Stata 15.0 software. RESULTS: The analysis included 64 studies with 3855 patients and 12 physical therapy modalities. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), the most effective treatments were HILT, ESWT, Hydrotherapy, Land-EX, LLLT, Braces, tDCS, US, IFCs, SWD, Insoles, and TENS. CONCLUSION: HILT appears to be the most effective treatment for pain relief in KOA patients. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
目的:本研究旨在通过网络荟萃分析评估各种物理治疗方法对膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者减轻疼痛的有效性。 方法:我们对多个数据库进行了全面检索,包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、维普、万方数据和中国知网,以确定关于KOA物理治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。检索时间跨度为每个数据库创建至2024年10月。使用Cochrane手册评估研究的方法学质量。使用视觉模拟量表、数字疼痛评分量表和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数等工具测量疼痛。所有疼痛评分均标准化为10分制。由两名研究人员使用Stata 15.0软件独立进行数据收集和分析。 结果:该分析纳入了64项研究,共3855名患者和12种物理治疗方式。根据累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRA),最有效的治疗方法是高强度激光疗法(HILT)、体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)、水疗、陆地运动疗法(Land-EX)、低强度激光疗法(LLLT)、支具、经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)、超声波疗法(US)、干扰电疗法(IFCs)、短波透热疗法(SWD)、鞋垫和经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)。 结论:HILT似乎是缓解KOA患者疼痛最有效的治疗方法。需要进一步的大规模RCT来证实这些发现。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025-4-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-16
Ann Intern Med. 2024-9
Biomedicines. 2024-7-27
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024-6-22
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2023-12