Suppr超能文献

多种物理治疗方式对膝骨关节炎患者疼痛的影响:一项网状Meta分析

The effects of various physical modalities on pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhou Xin, Yu Yating, Guo Jinwei, Cao Liezhen, Zhang Xiaohua, Deng Zhongliang

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, PR China.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chongqing University Jiangjin Hospital, Centre Hospital of Jiangjin District, Chongqing, 402260, PR China.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2025 Apr 3;63:171-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.045. eCollection 2025 May.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various physical therapy methods in reducing pain for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) through a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, VIP, WanFang Data, and CNKI, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on physical therapies for KOA. The search spanned from the inception of each database to October 2024. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook. Pain was measured using tools such as the visual analog scale, numeric pain rating scale, and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index. All pain scores were standardized to a 10-point scale. Data collection and analysis were performed independently by two researchers using Stata 15.0 software.

RESULTS

The analysis included 64 studies with 3855 patients and 12 physical therapy modalities. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), the most effective treatments were HILT, ESWT, Hydrotherapy, Land-EX, LLLT, Braces, tDCS, US, IFCs, SWD, Insoles, and TENS.

CONCLUSION

HILT appears to be the most effective treatment for pain relief in KOA patients. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过网络荟萃分析评估各种物理治疗方法对膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者减轻疼痛的有效性。

方法

我们对多个数据库进行了全面检索,包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、维普、万方数据和中国知网,以确定关于KOA物理治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。检索时间跨度为每个数据库创建至2024年10月。使用Cochrane手册评估研究的方法学质量。使用视觉模拟量表、数字疼痛评分量表和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数等工具测量疼痛。所有疼痛评分均标准化为10分制。由两名研究人员使用Stata 15.0软件独立进行数据收集和分析。

结果

该分析纳入了64项研究,共3855名患者和12种物理治疗方式。根据累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRA),最有效的治疗方法是高强度激光疗法(HILT)、体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)、水疗、陆地运动疗法(Land-EX)、低强度激光疗法(LLLT)、支具、经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)、超声波疗法(US)、干扰电疗法(IFCs)、短波透热疗法(SWD)、鞋垫和经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)。

结论

HILT似乎是缓解KOA患者疼痛最有效的治疗方法。需要进一步的大规模RCT来证实这些发现。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Knee Osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Sep;177(9):ITC129-ITC144. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-01249. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
3
Updates in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎治疗的进展
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Jun 22;59(3):e337-e348. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786351. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
OARSI year in review 2023: Rehabilitation and outcomes.OARSI 年度回顾 2023:康复与结果。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2023 Dec;31(12):1534-1547. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Sep 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验