Suppr超能文献

一项关于改变员工护理行为以改善养老院居民结局的干预措施的系统评价。

A Systematic Review of Interventions to Change Staff Care Practices in Order to Improve Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes.

作者信息

Low Lee-Fay, Fletcher Jennifer, Goodenough Belinda, Jeon Yun-Hee, Etherton-Beer Christopher, MacAndrew Margaret, Beattie Elizabeth

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Dementia Collaborative Research Centre: Assessment and Better Care, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 11;10(11):e0140711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140711. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We systematically reviewed interventions that attempted to change staff practice to improve long-term care resident outcomes.

METHODS

Studies met criteria if they used a control group, included 6 or more nursing home units and quantitatively assessed staff behavior or resident outcomes. Intervention components were coded as including education material, training, audit and feedback, monitoring, champions, team meetings, policy or procedures and organizational restructure.

RESULTS

Sixty-three unique studies were broadly grouped according to clinical domain-oral health (3 studies), hygiene and infection control (3 studies), nutrition (2 studies), nursing home acquired pneumonia (2 studies), depression (2 studies) appropriate prescribing (7 studies), reduction of physical restraints (3 studies), management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (6 studies), falls reduction and prevention (11 studies), quality improvement (9 studies), philosophy of care (10 studies) and other (5 studies). No single intervention component, combination of, or increased number of components was associated with greater likelihood of positive outcomes. Studies with positive outcomes for residents also tended to change staff behavior, however changing staff behavior did not necessarily improve resident outcomes. Studies targeting specific care tasks (e.g. oral care, physical restraints) were more likely to produce positive outcomes than those requiring global practice changes (e.g. care philosophy). Studies using intervention theories were more likely to be successful. Program logic was rarely articulated, so it was often unclear whether there was a coherent connection between the intervention components and measured outcomes. Many studies reported barriers relating to staff (e.g. turnover, high workload, attitudes) or organizational factors (e.g. funding, resources, logistics).

CONCLUSION

Changing staff practice in nursing homes is possible but complex. Interventionists should consider barriers and feasibility of program components to impact on each intended outcome.

摘要

背景

我们系统回顾了旨在改变工作人员行为以改善长期护理机构居民结局的干预措施。

方法

若研究使用了对照组,纳入6个或更多护理单元,并对工作人员行为或居民结局进行定量评估,则符合标准。干预措施的组成部分被编码为包括教育材料、培训、审核与反馈、监测、倡导者、团队会议、政策或程序以及组织架构调整。

结果

63项独特的研究根据临床领域大致分为:口腔健康(3项研究)、卫生与感染控制(3项研究)、营养(2项研究)、养老院获得性肺炎(2项研究)、抑郁症(2项研究)、合理用药(7项研究)、减少身体约束(3项研究)、痴呆症行为和心理症状管理(6项研究)、跌倒减少与预防(11项研究)、质量改进(9项研究)、护理理念(10项研究)以及其他(5项研究)。没有单一的干预措施组成部分、组合或组成部分数量的增加与更有可能产生积极结局相关。对居民有积极结局的研究也往往改变了工作人员的行为,然而改变工作人员行为并不一定能改善居民结局。针对特定护理任务(如口腔护理、身体约束)的研究比那些需要全面改变实践(如护理理念)的研究更有可能产生积极结局。使用干预理论的研究更有可能成功。项目逻辑很少被阐明,因此干预措施组成部分与所测量结局之间是否存在连贯的联系往往不清楚。许多研究报告了与工作人员相关的障碍(如人员流动、高工作量、态度)或组织因素(如资金、资源、后勤)。

结论

改变养老院工作人员的行为是可能的,但很复杂。干预者应考虑项目组成部分对每个预期结局产生影响的障碍和可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f70d/4641718/9f2c90e26c68/pone.0140711.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验