• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕期无症状菌尿的治疗时长。

Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.

作者信息

Widmer Mariana, Lopez Ivana, Gülmezoglu A Metin, Mignini Luciano, Roganti Ariel

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Office X031, Geneva, Switzerland, 1211.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 11;2015(11):CD000491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000491.pub3.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD000491.pub3
PMID:26560337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7043273/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A previous Cochrane systematic review has shown that antibiotic drug treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women substantially decreases the risk of pyelonephritis and reduces the risk of preterm delivery. However, it is not clear whether single-dose therapy is as effective as longer conventional antibiotic treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different durations of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2015) and reference lists of identified articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing antimicrobial therapeutic regimens that differed in duration (particularly comparing single dose with longer duration regimens) in pregnant women diagnosed with asymptomatic bacteriuria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 13 studies, involving 1622 women. All were comparisons of single-dose treatment with short-course (four- to seven-day) treatments. The risk of bias of trials included in this review was largely unclear, and most trials were at high risk of performance bias. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. When the any antibiotic agent was used, the 'no cure' rate for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women was slightly lower for the short-course treatment over the single-dose treatment, although there was evidence of statistical heterogeneity (average risk ratio (RR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.88; women = 1502, studies = 13; I² = 56%; very low quality evidence). Data from only good quality trials also showed better cure rates with short (four- to seven-day) regimens of the same microbial agent (average RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.33; women = 803, studies = two; I² = 0%; high quality evidence). There was no clear difference in the recurrence of asymptomatic bacteriuria rate between treatment and control groups, whether the same or different microbial agents were used (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.66; 445 women studies = eight; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence). Differences were detected for low birthweight babies, favoring a short course (four- to seven-day treatment) of the same microbial agent, although the data come from a single trial (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.57; 714 women; high quality evidence), but no differences were observed for preterm delivery (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.78; women = 804; studies = three; I² = 23%; moderate quality) or pyelonephritis (RR 3.09, 95% CI 0.54 to 17.55; women = 102; studies = two; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence). Finally, single-dose treatment of any microbial agent was associated with a decrease in reports of 'any side effects' (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.88; 1460 women, studies = 12; I² = 9%; low quality evidence). Evidence was downgraded for risk of bias concerns in trials contributing data and for imprecise effect estimates (wide confidence intervals crossing the line of no effect, and in some cases, small studies with few events).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A single-dose regimen of antibiotics may be less effective than a short-course (four- to seven-day) regimen, but more evidence is needed from large trials measuring important outcomes, such as cure rate. Women with asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy should be treated by the standard regimen of antibiotics until more data become available testing seven-day treatment compared with shorter courses of three- or five-day regimens.

摘要

背景

Cochrane系统评价先前显示,对孕妇无症状菌尿进行抗生素药物治疗可大幅降低肾盂肾炎风险并减少早产风险。然而,尚不清楚单剂量疗法是否与较长疗程的传统抗生素治疗效果相同。

目的

评估孕期无症状菌尿不同治疗时长的效果。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2015年8月31日)以及已识别文章的参考文献列表。

入选标准

比较诊断为无症状菌尿的孕妇中不同疗程(特别是比较单剂量与较长疗程方案)的抗菌治疗方案的随机和半随机试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估试验是否纳入及偏倚风险,提取数据并检查其准确性。我们使用GRADE方法评估证据质量。

主要结果

我们纳入了13项研究,涉及1622名女性。所有研究均为单剂量治疗与短疗程(4至7天)治疗的比较。本综述纳入试验的偏倚风险大多不明确,且大多数试验存在较高的实施偏倚风险。使用GRADE方法评估证据质量。当使用任何抗生素时,短疗程治疗的孕妇无症状菌尿“未治愈”率略低于单剂量治疗,尽管有统计学异质性的证据(平均风险比(RR)1.28,95%置信区间(CI)0.87至1.88;女性=1502,研究=13;I²=56%;极低质量证据)。仅来自高质量试验的数据也显示,相同微生物制剂的短疗程(4至7天)方案治愈率更高(平均RR 1.72,95%CI 1.27至2.33;女性=803,研究=2;I²=0%;高质量证据)。无论使用相同还是不同的微生物制剂,治疗组和对照组之间无症状菌尿复发率无明显差异(RR 1.13,95%CI 0.77至1.66;445名女性,研究=8;I²=0%;极低质量证据)。低出生体重儿方面存在差异,支持相同微生物制剂的短疗程(4至7天治疗),尽管数据来自单个试验(RR 1.65,95%CI 1.06至2.57;714名女性;高质量证据),但早产(RR 1.17,95%CI 0.77至1.78;女性=804;研究=3;I²=23%;中等质量)或肾盂肾炎(RR 3.09,95%CI 0.54至17.55;女性=102;研究=2;I²=0%;极低质量证据)方面未观察到差异。最后,任何微生物制剂的单剂量治疗与“任何副作用”报告减少相关(RR 0.70,95%CI 0.56至0.88;1460名女性,研究=12;I²=9%;低质量证据)。由于提供数据的试验存在偏倚风险以及效应估计不精确(宽置信区间跨越无效应线,且在某些情况下,事件数少的小型研究),证据被降级。

作者结论

抗生素单剂量方案可能不如短疗程(4至7天)方案有效,但需要更多大型试验提供证据,以衡量诸如治愈率等重要结局。孕期无症状菌尿的女性应采用标准抗生素方案治疗,直到有更多数据可用于比较7天治疗与3天或5天较短疗程治疗。

相似文献

1
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.孕期无症状菌尿的治疗时长。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 11;2015(11):CD000491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000491.pub3.
2
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.孕期无症状菌尿的治疗时长。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD000491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000491.pub2.
3
Interventions for treating genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy.妊娠期生殖道沙眼衣原体感染的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 22;9(9):CD010485. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010485.pub2.
4
Different treatment regimens of magnesium sulphate for tocolysis in women in preterm labour.硫酸镁用于早产女性保胎治疗的不同方案
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 14;2015(12):CD011200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011200.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy.孕期无症状菌尿的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 7(8):CD000490. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000490.pub3.
7
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛用于分娩疼痛管理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for babies at risk of preterm birth.不同的皮质类固醇药物和方案用于加速有早产风险的婴儿的胎儿肺成熟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 9;8(8):CD006764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006764.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Single-dose Fosfomycin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.单剂量磷霉素治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的疗效与安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Midlife Health. 2025 Apr-Jun;16(2):124-136. doi: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_77_24. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
2
Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies of Pharmacological Interventions: A Meta-Analysis.随机和非随机药物干预研究的治疗效果:Meta 分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2436230. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.36230.
3
Real world drug treatment models for pregnancy complicated with urinary tract infection in China from 2018 to 2022: a cross-section analysis.2018年至2022年中国妊娠合并尿路感染的真实世界药物治疗模式:横断面分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 29;15:1349121. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1349121. eCollection 2024.
4
Analgesic effects of LI4 acupuncture during intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled clinical trial.针刺 LI4 穴减轻宫内节育器放置术疼痛的随机对照临床试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;308(4):1361-1368. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07106-5. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
5
Mixed Bacterial Growth in Prenatal Urine Cultures; An Investigation into Prevalence, Contributory Factors and the Impact of education-based Interventions.产前尿液培养中混合细菌生长;对流行情况、促成因素以及基于教育的干预措施的影响的调查。
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Sep;27(9):1481-1488. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03615-6. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Which Antibiotic for Urinary Tract Infections in Pregnancy? A Literature Review of International Guidelines.孕期尿路感染用哪种抗生素?国际指南的文献综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 5;11(23):7226. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237226.
7
[Preventive activities in women. PAPPS update 2022].[女性预防活动。2022年PAPPS更新]
Aten Primaria. 2022 Oct;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):102471. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102471.
8
Interventions for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a scoping review of systematic reviews.干预措施预防自发性早产:系统评价的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 13;12(5):e052576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052576.
9
Characteristics of Women with Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnancy.妊娠期尿路感染患者的特征。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Nov;30(11):1556-1564. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8946. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
10
Bacterial Profile and asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women in Africa: A systematic review and meta analysis.非洲孕妇的细菌谱及无症状菌尿:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 9;37:100952. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100952. eCollection 2021 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Maternal and neonatal consequences of treated and untreated asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: a prospective cohort study with an embedded randomised controlled trial.治疗和未治疗无症状菌尿症孕妇的母婴结局:一项前瞻性队列研究和嵌入式随机对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;15(11):1324-33. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00070-5. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
2
Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy.孕期无症状菌尿的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 7(8):CD000490. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000490.pub3.
3
[The efficacy and safety of cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study].
Urologiia. 2013 Sep-Oct(5):24, 26-8.
4
Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions.抗生素耐药性——全球解决方案的必要性。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;13(12):1057-98. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9. Epub 2013 Nov 17.
5
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.孕期无症状菌尿的治疗时长。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD000491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000491.pub2.
6
Fosfomycin in a single dose versus a 7-day course of amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.单次剂量磷霉素与 7 天疗程阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗妊娠无症状菌尿。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Dec;28(12):1457-64. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0805-6. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
7
One-day compared with 7-day nitrofurantoin for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.孕期无症状菌尿症:一日与七日呋喃妥因治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;113(2 Pt 1):339-45. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318195c2a2.
8
Is single-dose fosfomycin trometamol a good alternative for asymptomatic bacteriuria in the second trimesterof pregnancy?单剂量磷霉素氨丁三醇对妊娠中期无症状菌尿症来说是一种好的替代药物吗?
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 May;18(5):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0190-y. Epub 2006 Aug 29.
9
Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults.美国传染病学会成人无症状菌尿症诊断和治疗指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Mar 1;40(5):643-54. doi: 10.1086/427507. Epub 2005 Feb 4.
10
Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery.宫内感染与早产。
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1500-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422007.