Weeland Joyce, Slagt Meike, Brummelman Eddie, Matthys Walter, de Castro Bram Orobio, Overbeek Geertjan
Utrecht Centre for Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 11;10(11):e0141474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141474. eCollection 2015.
There is increasing evidence that variation in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter gene SLC6A4 (i.e., the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism) moderates the impact of environmental stressors on child psychopathology. Emotional reactivity -the intensity of an individual's response to other's emotions- has been put forward as a possible mechanism underlying these gene-by-environment interactions (i.e., G×E). Compared to children homozygous for the L-allele (LL-genotypes), children carrying an S-allele (SS/SL-genotypes), specifically when they have been frequently exposed to negative emotions in the family environment, might be more emotionally reactive and therefore more susceptible to affective environmental stressors. However, the association between 5-HTTLPR and emotional reactivity in children has not yet been empirically tested. Therefore, the goal of this study was to test this association in a large-scale experiment.
Children (N = 521, 52.5% boys, Mage = 9.72 years) were genotyped and randomly assigned to happy, angry or neutral dynamic facial expressions and vocalizations. Motor and affective emotional reactivity were assessed through children's self-reported negative and positive affect (n = 460) and facial electromyography activity (i.e., fEMG: the zygomaticus or "smile" muscle and the corrugator or "frown" muscle, n = 403). Parents reported on their negative and positive parenting behaviors.
Children mimicked and experienced the emotion they were exposed to. However, neither motor reactivity nor affective reactivity to these emotions depended on children's 5-HTTLPR genotype: SS/SL-genotypes did not manifest any stronger response to emotional stimuli than LL-genotypes. This finding remained the same when taking the broader family environment into account, controlling for kinship, age, gender and genetic ancestry, and when including a tri-allelic factor.
We found no evidence for an association between the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and children's emotional reactivity. This finding is important, in discounting one potential underlying endophenotype of G×E between the 5-HTTLPR and affective environmental stressors.
越来越多的证据表明,血清素转运体基因SLC6A4启动子区域的变异(即5-HTTLPR多态性)会调节环境应激源对儿童精神病理学的影响。情绪反应性——个体对他人情绪的反应强度——已被提出作为这些基因-环境相互作用(即G×E)的一种可能机制。与L等位基因纯合子(LL基因型)的儿童相比,携带S等位基因(SS/SL基因型)的儿童,特别是当他们在家庭环境中频繁接触负面情绪时,可能情绪反应性更强,因此更容易受到情感环境应激源的影响。然而,5-HTTLPR与儿童情绪反应性之间的关联尚未得到实证检验。因此,本研究的目的是在一项大规模实验中检验这种关联。
对儿童(N = 521,52.5%为男孩,平均年龄Mage = 9.72岁)进行基因分型,并随机分配到快乐、愤怒或中性的动态面部表情和声音情境中。通过儿童自我报告的负面和正面情绪(n = 460)以及面部肌电图活动(即fEMG:颧肌或“微笑”肌以及皱眉肌或“皱眉”肌,n = 403)来评估运动和情感情绪反应性。父母报告他们的负面和正面养育行为。
儿童模仿并体验了他们所接触到的情绪。然而,对这些情绪的运动反应性和情感反应性均不依赖于儿童的5-HTTLPR基因型:SS/SL基因型对情绪刺激的反应并不比LL基因型更强。在考虑更广泛的家庭环境、控制亲属关系、年龄、性别和遗传血统时,以及纳入一个三等位基因因素时,这一发现保持不变。
我们没有发现5-HTTLPR多态性与儿童情绪反应性之间存在关联的证据。这一发现很重要,因为它排除了5-HTTLPR与情感环境应激源之间G×E的一种潜在潜在内表型。